Rodríguez-Mansilla Juan, González López-Arza María Victoria, Varela-Donoso Enrique, Montanero-Fernández Jesús, González Sánchez Blanca, Garrido-Ardila Elisa María
Department of Medical-Surgical Therapy, Extremadura University, Badajoz, Spain
Department of Medical-Surgical Therapy, Extremadura University, Badajoz, Spain.
Clin Rehabil. 2015 Jul;29(7):683-93. doi: 10.1177/0269215514554240. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
To assess the effectiveness of ear acupressure and massage vs. control in the improvement of pain, anxiety and depression in persons diagnosed with dementia.
A pilot randomized controlled trial.
Residential homes in Extremadura (Spain).
A total of 120 elders with dementia institutionalized in residential homes.
The participants were randomly allocated, in three groups. Control group - they continued with their routine activities; ear acupressure intervention group - they received ear acupressure treatment (pressure was applied to acupressure points on the ear); and massage therapy intervention group - they received relaxing massage therapy.
The variables pain, anxiety and depression were assessed with the Doloplus2, Cornell and Campbell scales. The study was carried out during five months; three months of experimental treatment and two months with no treatment. The assessments were done at baseline, each month during the treatment and at one and two months of follow-up. In the statistical analysis the three groups were compared with each other.
A total of 111 participants completed the study. Their aged ranged from 67 to 91 years old and 86 of them (77.4%) were women. The ear acupressure intervention group showed better improvements than the massage therapy intervention group in relation to pain and depression during the treatment period and at one month of follow-up. The best improvement in pain was achieved in the last (3rd) month of ear acupressure treatment (p < 0.001) being the average improvement 8.55 (4.39) with IC 95% (7.14, 9.95). Regarding anxiety, the best results were also observed in the last month of treatment. The average improvement in anxiety was 9.63 (5.00) with IC 95% (8.02, 11.23) CONCLUSIONS: Ear acupressure and massage therapy showed better results than the control group in relation to pain, anxiety and depression. However, ear acupressure achieved more improvements.
评估耳穴按压和按摩与对照相比,对改善痴呆症患者疼痛、焦虑和抑郁状况的效果。
一项试点随机对照试验。
西班牙埃斯特雷马杜拉的养老院。
共有120名在养老院中生活的患有痴呆症的老年人。
参与者被随机分为三组。对照组——继续其日常活动;耳穴按压干预组——接受耳穴按压治疗(在耳部的穴位上施加压力);按摩疗法干预组——接受放松按摩疗法。
使用Doloplus2、康奈尔和坎贝尔量表评估疼痛、焦虑和抑郁变量。该研究持续五个月;三个月的实验性治疗和两个月的无治疗期。评估在基线、治疗期间每月以及随访的1个月和2个月时进行。在统计分析中,对三组进行相互比较。
共有111名参与者完成了研究。他们的年龄在67至91岁之间,其中86名(77.4%)为女性。在治疗期间和随访1个月时,耳穴按压干预组在疼痛和抑郁方面的改善比按摩疗法干预组更好。耳穴按压治疗的最后(第3)个月疼痛改善最佳(p < 0.001),平均改善为8.55(4.39),95%置信区间为(7.14,9.95)。关于焦虑,在治疗的最后一个月也观察到了最佳结果。焦虑的平均改善为9.63(5.00),95%置信区间为(8.02,11.23)。结论:与对照组相比,耳穴按压和按摩疗法在疼痛、焦虑和抑郁方面显示出更好的效果。然而,耳穴按压取得的改善更多。