Patmont Clayton R, Ghosh Upal, LaRosa Paul, Menzie Charles A, Luthy Richard G, Greenberg Marc S, Cornelissen Gerard, Eek Espen, Collins John, Hull John, Hjartland Tore, Glaza Edward, Bleiler John, Quadrini James
Anchor QEA, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2015 Apr;11(2):195-207. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1589. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
This paper reviews general approaches for applying activated carbon (AC) amendments as an in situ sediment treatment remedy. In situ sediment treatment involves targeted placement of amendments using installation options that fall into two general approaches: 1) directly applying a thin layer of amendments (which potentially incorporates weighting or binding materials) to surface sediment, with or without initial mixing; and 2) incorporating amendments into a premixed, blended cover material of clean sand or sediment, which is also applied to the sediment surface. Over the past decade, pilot- or full-scale field sediment treatment projects using AC-globally recognized as one of the most effective sorbents for organic contaminants-were completed or were underway at more than 25 field sites in the United States, Norway, and the Netherlands. Collectively, these field projects (along with numerous laboratory experiments) have demonstrated the efficacy of AC for in situ treatment in a range of contaminated sediment conditions. Results from experimental studies and field applications indicate that in situ sequestration and immobilization treatment of hydrophobic organic compounds using either installation approach can reduce porewater concentrations and biouptake significantly, often becoming more effective over time due to progressive mass transfer. Certain conditions, such as use in unstable sediment environments, should be taken into account to maximize AC effectiveness over long time periods. In situ treatment is generally less disruptive and less expensive than traditional sediment cleanup technologies such as dredging or isolation capping. Proper site-specific balancing of the potential benefits, risks, ecological effects, and costs of in situ treatment technologies (in this case, AC) relative to other sediment cleanup technologies is important to successful full-scale field application. Extensive experimental studies and field trials have shown that when applied correctly, in situ treatment via contaminant sequestration and immobilization using a sorbent material such as AC has progressed from an innovative sediment remediation approach to a proven, reliable technology.
本文综述了将活性炭(AC)改良剂用作原位沉积物处理补救措施的一般方法。原位沉积物处理涉及使用两种一般方法的安装选项有针对性地放置改良剂:1)直接在表层沉积物上施加一薄层改良剂(可能包含增重或粘结材料),有无初始混合均可;2)将改良剂掺入预先混合的清洁沙子或沉积物的混合覆盖材料中,该材料也应用于沉积物表面。在过去十年中,美国、挪威和荷兰的25多个现场地点完成了或正在进行使用AC的中试或全尺寸现场沉积物处理项目,AC是全球公认的对有机污染物最有效的吸附剂之一。总体而言,这些现场项目(以及众多实验室实验)已证明AC在一系列受污染沉积物条件下进行原位处理的有效性。实验研究和现场应用的结果表明,使用任何一种安装方法对疏水性有机化合物进行原位封存和固定处理均可显著降低孔隙水浓度和生物吸收量,由于传质过程的进行,随着时间的推移通常会变得更加有效。为了在长时间内使AC发挥最大效果,应考虑某些条件,例如在不稳定沉积物环境中的使用。原位处理通常比疏浚或隔离覆盖等传统沉积物清理技术的干扰性更小且成本更低。相对于其他沉积物清理技术,对原位处理技术(在这种情况下为AC)的潜在益处、风险、生态影响和成本进行适当的特定场地平衡对于成功进行全尺寸现场应用非常重要。大量实验研究和现场试验表明,当正确应用时,通过使用吸附剂材料(如AC)进行污染物封存和固定的原位处理已从一种创新的沉积物修复方法发展成为一种经过验证的可靠技术。