Emhofer Waltraud, Lichtenegger Klaus, Haslinger Walter, Hofbauer Hermann, Schmutzer-Roseneder Irene, Aigenbauer Stefan, Lienhard Martin
1.Bioenergy2020+ GmbH, Gewerbepark Haag 3, 3250 Wieselburg-Land, Austria 2.Vienna University of Technology, Institute of Chemical Engineering, Getreidemarkt 9/166, 1060 Vienna, Austria
1.Bioenergy2020+ GmbH, Gewerbepark Haag 3, 3250 Wieselburg-Land, Austria.
Ann Occup Hyg. 2015 Jan;59(1):79-90. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu076. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
Wood pellets have been reported to emit toxic gaseous emissions during transport and storage. Carbon monoxide (CO) emission, due to the high toxicity of the gas and the possibility of it being present at high levels, is the most imminent threat to be considered before entering a pellet storage facility. For small-scale (<30 tons storage capacity) residential pellet storage facilities, ventilation, preferably natural ventilation utilizing already existing openings, has become the most favored solution to overcome the problem of high CO concentrations. However, there is little knowledge on the ventilation rates that can be reached and thus on the effectiveness of such measures. The aim of the study was to investigate ventilation rates for a specific small-scale pellet storage system depending on characteristic temperature differences. Furthermore, the influence of the implementation of a chimney and the influence of cross-ventilation on the ventilation rates were investigated. The air exchange rates observed in the experiments ranged between close to zero and up to 8 m(3) h(-1), depending largely on the existing temperature differences and the existence of cross-ventilation. The results demonstrate that implementing natural ventilation is a possible measure to enhance safety from CO emissions, but not one without limitations.
据报道,木质颗粒在运输和储存过程中会排放有毒气体。一氧化碳(CO)排放由于其高毒性以及可能存在的高浓度,是进入颗粒储存设施之前需要考虑的最紧迫威胁。对于小规模(储存容量小于30吨)的住宅颗粒储存设施,通风,最好是利用现有开口的自然通风,已成为克服高CO浓度问题的最受欢迎解决方案。然而,对于能够达到的通风率以及此类措施的有效性,人们了解甚少。该研究的目的是根据特征温度差异研究特定小规模颗粒储存系统的通风率。此外,还研究了烟囱的设置以及交叉通风对通风率的影响。实验中观察到的空气交换率在接近零至高达8立方米每小时之间,这在很大程度上取决于现有的温度差异和交叉通风情况。结果表明,实施自然通风是提高CO排放安全性的一种可行措施,但并非没有局限性。