• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同欧洲医疗环境下新型口服抗凝剂用于心房颤动患者预防卒中的成本效益

Cost effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in two different European healthcare settings.

作者信息

Verhoef Talitha I, Redekop William K, Hasrat Fazila, de Boer Anthonius, Maitland-van der Zee Anke Hilse

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Science, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, P. O. Box 80 082, 3508 TB, Utrecht, The Netherlands,

出版信息

Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2014 Dec;14(6):451-62. doi: 10.1007/s40256-014-0092-1.

DOI:10.1007/s40256-014-0092-1
PMID:25326294
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4250561/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to investigate the cost effectiveness of apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran compared with coumarin derivatives for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in a country with specialized anticoagulation clinics (the Netherlands) and in a country without these clinics (the UK).

METHODS

A decision-analytic Markov model was used to analyse the cost effectiveness of apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran compared with coumarin derivatives in the Netherlands and the UK over a lifetime horizon.

RESULTS

In the Netherlands, the use of rivaroxaban, apixaban, or dabigatran increased health by 0.166, 0.365, and 0.374 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared with coumarin derivatives, but also increased costs by 5,681, 4,754, and 5,465, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were 34,248, 13,024, and 14,626 per QALY gained. In the UK, health was increased by 0.302, 0.455, and 0.461 QALYs, and the incremental costs were similar for all three new oral anticoagulants (5,118-5,217). The ICERs varied from 11,172 to 16,949 per QALY gained. In the Netherlands, apixaban had the highest chance (37 %) of being cost effective at a threshold of 20,000; in the UK, this chance was 41 % for dabigatran. The quality of care, reflected in time in therapeutic range, had an important influence on the ICER.

CONCLUSIONS

Apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran are cost-effective alternatives to coumarin derivatives in the UK, while in the Netherlands, only apixaban and dabigatran could be considered cost effective. The cost effectiveness of the new oral anticoagulants is largely dependent on the setting and quality of local anticoagulant care facilities.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是在一个设有专业抗凝门诊的国家(荷兰)和一个没有这些门诊的国家(英国),研究阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和达比加群与香豆素衍生物相比,在预防房颤患者中风方面的成本效益。

方法

采用决策分析马尔可夫模型,分析在荷兰和英国,阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和达比加群与香豆素衍生物相比在整个生命周期内的成本效益。

结果

在荷兰,与香豆素衍生物相比,使用利伐沙班、阿哌沙班或达比加群分别使健康状况改善了0.166、0.365和0.374个质量调整生命年(QALY),但成本也分别增加了5681欧元、4754欧元和5465欧元。每获得一个QALY的增量成本效益比(ICER)分别为34248欧元、13024欧元和14626欧元。在英国,健康状况改善了0.302、0.455和0.461个QALY,三种新型口服抗凝剂的增量成本相似(5118 - 5217欧元)。每获得一个QALY的ICER在11172欧元至16949欧元之间。在荷兰,在成本效益阈值为20000欧元时,阿哌沙班具有最高的成本效益机会(%);在英国,达比加群的这一机会为41%。治疗范围内的时间所反映的护理质量对ICER有重要影响。

结论

在英国,阿哌沙班、利伐沙班和达比加群是香豆素衍生物具有成本效益的替代药物,而在荷兰,只有阿哌沙班和达比加群可被认为具有成本效益。新型口服抗凝剂的成本效益在很大程度上取决于当地抗凝护理设施的环境和质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8c5/4250561/ca12c58ac2a9/40256_2014_92_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8c5/4250561/859d06ece7d9/40256_2014_92_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8c5/4250561/ef22bb991006/40256_2014_92_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8c5/4250561/26db96ba42c4/40256_2014_92_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8c5/4250561/ca12c58ac2a9/40256_2014_92_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8c5/4250561/859d06ece7d9/40256_2014_92_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8c5/4250561/ef22bb991006/40256_2014_92_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8c5/4250561/26db96ba42c4/40256_2014_92_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8c5/4250561/ca12c58ac2a9/40256_2014_92_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in two different European healthcare settings.两种不同欧洲医疗环境下新型口服抗凝剂用于心房颤动患者预防卒中的成本效益
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2014 Dec;14(6):451-62. doi: 10.1007/s40256-014-0092-1.
2
Cost-effectiveness of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.阿哌沙班、达比加群、利伐沙班和华法林预防房颤卒中的成本效益分析。
Stroke. 2013 Jun;44(6):1676-81. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.000402. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
3
Cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in preventing stroke and other cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation.新型口服抗凝剂与华法林预防房颤患者中风和其他心血管事件的成本效益比较。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):498-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
4
Cost-effectiveness of apixaban versus other new oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.阿哌沙班与其他新型口服抗凝药预防心房颤动卒中的成本效益比较。
Clin Ther. 2014 Feb 1;36(2):192-210.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
5
Apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林预防非瓣膜性心房颤动卒中共效性分析:成本效益研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Jan;34(1):9-17. doi: 10.1007/s40261-013-0144-3.
6
Economic evaluation of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.华法林、达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班用于心房颤动卒中预防的经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jun;32(6):601-12. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0152-z.
7
[Cost-effectiveness of apixaban compared to other new oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation].[阿哌沙班与其他新型口服抗凝剂治疗非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的成本效益比较]
Kardiologiia. 2014;54(7):43-52. doi: 10.18565/cardio.2014.7.43-52.
8
Stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in France: comparative cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban), warfarin, and aspirin.法国心房颤动患者的卒中预防:新型口服抗凝剂(阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班)、华法林和阿司匹林的成本效果比较。
J Med Econ. 2014 Aug;17(8):587-98. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.923891. Epub 2014 May 29.
9
Cost-effectiveness of oral anticoagulants for treatment of atrial fibrillation.口服抗凝剂治疗心房颤动的成本效益
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Nov;6(6):724-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000661. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
10
Medical cost reductions associated with the usage of novel oral anticoagulants vs warfarin among atrial fibrillation patients, based on the RE-LY, ROCKET-AF, and ARISTOTLE trials.基于 RE-LY、ROCKET-AF 和 ARISTOTLE 试验,新型口服抗凝剂与华法林在房颤患者中的使用相关的医疗费用降低。
J Med Econ. 2012;15(4):776-85. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2012.680555. Epub 2012 Apr 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors influencing the cost-effectiveness of novel oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review.与维生素K拮抗剂相比,影响新型口服抗凝剂在房颤患者中成本效益的因素:一项系统评价
Front Pharmacol. 2025 Mar 28;16:1441754. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2025.1441754. eCollection 2025.
2
Budget and health impact of switching eligible patients with atrial fibrillation to lower- dose dabigatran.将符合条件的房颤患者换用低剂量达比加群的预算及健康影响
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023 Sep 4;11(1):2247719. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2247719. eCollection 2023.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital Costs Of Ischemic Stroke And Transient Ischemic Attack In The Netherlands.荷兰缺血性中风和短暂性脑缺血发作的住院费用。
Value Health. 2014 Nov;17(7):A485. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.1416. Epub 2014 Oct 26.
2
Stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation in France: comparative cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban), warfarin, and aspirin.法国心房颤动患者的卒中预防:新型口服抗凝剂(阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班)、华法林和阿司匹林的成本效果比较。
J Med Econ. 2014 Aug;17(8):587-98. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.923891. Epub 2014 May 29.
3
Economic evaluation of warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Cost Effectiveness of Strategies to Manage Atrial Fibrillation in Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.
中高收入国家管理心房颤动策略的成本效益:系统评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2023 Aug;41(8):913-943. doi: 10.1007/s40273-023-01276-5. Epub 2023 May 19.
4
Coumarin Derivatives Inhibit ADP-Induced Platelet Activation and Aggregation.香豆素衍生物抑制 ADP 诱导的血小板活化和聚集。
Molecules. 2022 Jun 23;27(13):4054. doi: 10.3390/molecules27134054.
5
Economic evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)与维生素 K 拮抗剂(VKAs)预防房颤患者卒中的经济学评价:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2022 Aug;27(4):215-223. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2020-111634. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
6
Computational models of atrial fibrillation: achievements, challenges, and perspectives for improving clinical care.心房颤动的计算模型:成就、挑战和改善临床护理的展望。
Cardiovasc Res. 2021 Jun 16;117(7):1682-1699. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvab138.
7
Changes in anticoagulant prescription in Dutch patients with recent-onset atrial fibrillation: observations from the GARFIELD-AF registry.荷兰近期发生房颤患者抗凝处方的变化:来自GARFIELD-AF注册研究的观察结果
Thromb J. 2020 Mar 30;18:5. doi: 10.1186/s12959-020-00218-x. eCollection 2020.
8
Current Anticoagulant Usage Patterns and Determinants in Korean Patients with Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.韩国非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的当前抗凝药物使用模式和决定因素。
Yonsei Med J. 2020 Feb;61(2):120-128. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2020.61.2.120.
9
The contribution of real-world evidence to cost-effectiveness analysis: case study of Dabigatran etexilate in France.真实世界证据对成本效益分析的贡献:以法国达比加群酯为例的研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2020 Mar;21(2):235-249. doi: 10.1007/s10198-019-01123-5. Epub 2019 Oct 24.
10
Cost-effectiveness of apixaban compared to other anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation in the real-world and trial settings.在真实世界和临床试验环境中,比较阿哌沙班与其他抗凝剂在房颤患者中的成本效益。
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 17;14(9):e0222658. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222658. eCollection 2019.
华法林、达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班用于心房颤动卒中预防的经济学评价
Pharmacoeconomics. 2014 Jun;32(6):601-12. doi: 10.1007/s40273-014-0152-z.
4
Cost-effectiveness of apixaban vs. current standard of care for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation.阿哌沙班与心房颤动患者预防中风的现行标准治疗方法的成本效益对比。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul 21;35(28):1897-906. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu006. Epub 2014 Feb 9.
5
Cost-effectiveness of oral anticoagulants for treatment of atrial fibrillation.口服抗凝剂治疗心房颤动的成本效益
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Nov;6(6):724-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000661. Epub 2013 Nov 12.
6
Comparison of cost-effectiveness of anticoagulation with dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation across countries.达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班用于非瓣膜性心房颤动患者抗凝治疗的成本效益在不同国家间的比较。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2014 May;37(4):507-23. doi: 10.1007/s11239-013-0989-6.
7
Apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban versus warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a cost-effectiveness analysis.阿哌沙班、达比加群和利伐沙班与华法林预防非瓣膜性心房颤动卒中共效性分析:成本效益研究。
Clin Drug Investig. 2014 Jan;34(1):9-17. doi: 10.1007/s40261-013-0144-3.
8
Cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetics-guided warfarin therapy vs. alternative anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation.基于药物遗传学的华法林治疗与房颤的其他抗凝治疗的成本效益比较。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Feb;95(2):199-207. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2013.190. Epub 2013 Sep 23.
9
Cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants in the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.新型口服抗凝剂在预防房颤患者中风中的成本效益。
Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2013 Jun;26(2):225-37. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2013.07.012. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
10
Cost-effectiveness of new oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin in preventing stroke and other cardiovascular events in patients with atrial fibrillation.新型口服抗凝剂与华法林预防房颤患者中风和其他心血管事件的成本效益比较。
Value Health. 2013 Jun;16(4):498-506. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Apr 23.