Department of Anesthesiology, Stanford Hospital & Clinics, Stanford, California, USA.
Department of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Mar;22(2):459-64. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003065. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
Despite substantial investments in health information technology (HIT), the nation's goals of reducing cost and improving outcomes through HIT remain elusive. This period of transition, with new Office of National Coordinator for HIT leadership, upcoming Meaningful Use Stage III definitions, and increasing congressional oversight, is opportune to consider needed course corrections in HIT strategy. This article describes current problems and recommended changes in HIT policy, including approaches to usability, interoperability, and quality measurement. Recommendations refrain from interim measures, such as electronic health record adoption rates, and instead focus on measurable national value to benefit the economy, to reduce healthcare costs, and to improve clinical efficiency and care quality.
尽管在卫生信息技术 (HIT) 方面投入了大量资金,但通过 HIT 降低成本和提高成效的目标仍然难以实现。在这个过渡时期,新的国家卫生信息技术协调员办公室领导、即将出台的《有意义使用》第三阶段的定义以及不断增加的国会监督,是考虑对 HIT 战略进行必要的调整的好时机。本文描述了 HIT 政策方面的当前问题和建议的变革,包括可用性、互操作性和质量测量方法。建议不采用临时措施,如电子健康记录的采用率,而是侧重于可衡量的国家价值,以造福经济、降低医疗成本以及提高临床效率和护理质量。