• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我们到了吗?人为因素知识与健康信息技术——实施与影响的挑战

Are We There Yet? Human Factors Knowledge and Health Information Technology - the Challenges of Implementation and Impact.

作者信息

Turner P, Kushniruk A, Nohr C

出版信息

Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):84-91. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-014. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

DOI:10.15265/IY-2017-014
PMID:29063542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6239238/
Abstract

To review the developments in human factors (HF) research on the challenges of health information technology (HIT) implementation and impact given the continuing incidence of usability problems and unintended consequences from HIT development and use. A search of PubMed/Medline and Web of Science® identified HF research published in 2015 and 2016. Electronic health records (EHRs) and patient-centred HIT emerged as significant foci of recent HF research. The authors selected prominent papers highlighting ongoing HF and usability challenges in these areas. This selective rather than systematic review of recent HF research highlights these key challenges and reflects on their implications on the future impact of HF research on HIT. Research provides evidence of continued poor design, implementation, and usability of HIT, as well as technology-induced errors and unintended consequences. The paper highlights support for: (i) strengthening the evidence base on the benefits of HF approaches; (ii) improving knowledge translation in the implementation of HF approaches during HIT design, implementation, and evaluation; (iii) increasing transparency, governance, and enforcement of HF best practices at all stages of the HIT system development life cycle. HF and usability approaches are yet to become embedded as integral components of HIT development, implementation, and impact assessment. As HIT becomes ever-more pervasive including with patients as end-users, there is a need to expand our conceptualisation of the problems to be addressed and the suite of tactics and strategies to be used to calibrate our pro-active involvement in its improvement.

摘要

鉴于健康信息技术(HIT)开发与使用中持续出现的可用性问题和意外后果,回顾人类因素(HF)研究在HIT实施挑战及影响方面的进展。通过检索PubMed/Medline和科学网®,确定了2015年和2016年发表的HF研究。电子健康记录(EHR)和以患者为中心的HIT成为近期HF研究的重要焦点。作者挑选了突出这些领域中持续存在的HF和可用性挑战的重要论文。对近期HF研究的这种选择性而非系统性回顾突出了这些关键挑战,并思考了它们对HF研究未来对HIT影响的意义。研究提供了证据,表明HIT在设计、实施和可用性方面持续不佳,以及技术引发的错误和意外后果。本文强调支持:(i)加强关于HF方法益处的证据基础;(ii)在HIT设计、实施和评估过程中改进HF方法实施中的知识转化;(iii)在HIT系统开发生命周期的所有阶段提高HF最佳实践的透明度、治理和执行力度。HF和可用性方法尚未成为HIT开发、实施和影响评估的组成部分。随着HIT变得越来越普及,包括患者成为最终用户,有必要扩大我们对要解决问题的概念化,以及用于校准我们积极参与改进的一系列策略和战术。

相似文献

1
Are We There Yet? Human Factors Knowledge and Health Information Technology - the Challenges of Implementation and Impact.我们到了吗?人为因素知识与健康信息技术——实施与影响的挑战
Yearb Med Inform. 2017 Aug;26(1):84-91. doi: 10.15265/IY-2017-014. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
2
Rapid molecular tests for tuberculosis and tuberculosis drug resistance: a qualitative evidence synthesis of recipient and provider views.快速分子检测结核分枝杆菌和结核分枝杆菌耐药性:受检者和提供者观点的定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 26;4(4):CD014877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014877.pub2.
3
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
4
Antidepressants for pain management in adults with chronic pain: a network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人慢性疼痛的疼痛管理:一项网络荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Oct;28(62):1-155. doi: 10.3310/MKRT2948.
5
EORTC guidelines for the use of erythropoietic proteins in anaemic patients with cancer: 2006 update.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织(EORTC)癌症贫血患者促红细胞生成蛋白使用指南:2006年更新版
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Jan;43(2):258-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.10.014. Epub 2006 Dec 19.
6
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
7
Designing Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS)-A User-Centered Lens of the Design Characteristics, Challenges, and Implications: Systematic Review.设计临床决策支持系统(CDSS)——基于用户中心视角的设计特征、挑战及影响:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 20;27:e63733. doi: 10.2196/63733.
8
Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.巴雷特食管的监测:通过系统评价、专家研讨会和经济模型探索不确定性
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Mar;10(8):1-142, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10080.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.

引用本文的文献

1
A Usability Survey of a Quality Improvement Data Visualization Tool Among Medical Intensive Care Unit Nurses.医学重症监护病房护士对质量改进数据可视化工具的可用性调查
ACI open. 2024 Jan;8(1):e33-e42. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1782604. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
Integrated Hands-Free Electronic Patient Care Report (ePCR) Charting (IHeC): Designing the Architecture.集成免提电子患者护理报告(ePCR)图表记录(IHeC):架构设计
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:533-540. eCollection 2024.
3
Work system barriers and facilitators of a team health information technology.团队健康信息技术的工作系统障碍和促进因素。
Appl Ergon. 2023 Nov;113:104105. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2023.104105. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
4
Implementation and use of technology-enabled blood pressure monitoring and teleconsultation in Singapore's primary care: a qualitative evaluation using the socio-technical systems approach.利用技术实现的血压监测和远程咨询在新加坡初级保健中的实施和使用:采用社会技术系统方法进行的定性评估。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Mar 16;24(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02014-8.
5
High quality, safe healthcare = technology + people + systems thinking.高质量、安全的医疗保健 = 技术 + 人员 + 系统思维。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2022 Sep;29(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2022-100673.
6
Human-centered design of team health IT for pediatric trauma care transitions.以患者为中心的儿科创伤护理过渡团队健康信息技术设计。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Mar 2;162:104727. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104727.
7
A Remote Patient-Monitoring System for Intensive Care Medicine: Mixed Methods Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation.一种用于重症医学的远程患者监测系统:混合方法的以人为本设计与可用性评估
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Mar 11;9(1):e30655. doi: 10.2196/30655.
8
Collaborative design and implementation of a clinical decision support system for automated fall-risk identification and referrals in emergency departments.协作设计和实施临床决策支持系统,以自动识别和转介急诊科的跌倒风险。
Healthc (Amst). 2022 Mar;10(1):100598. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100598. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
Perceptual Gaps Between Clinicians and Technologists on Health Information Technology-Related Errors in Hospitals: Observational Study.医院中临床医生与技术人员在健康信息技术相关错误上的认知差距:观察性研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2021 Feb 5;8(1):e21884. doi: 10.2196/21884.
10
Human Factors and Usability for Health Information Technology: Old and New Challenges.健康信息技术中的人为因素与可用性:新旧挑战
Yearb Med Inform. 2019 Aug;28(1):71-77. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1677907. Epub 2019 Aug 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Low-Cost Rapid Usability Testing: Its Application in Both Product Development and System Implementation.低成本快速可用性测试:其在产品开发与系统实施中的应用
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;234:195-200.
2
The Precision Medicine Initiative's All of Us Research Program: an agenda for research on its ethical, legal, and social issues.精准医学倡议的“我们所有人”研究计划:关于其伦理、法律和社会问题的研究议程。
Genet Med. 2017 Jul;19(7):743-750. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.183. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
3
Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.可用性问题不会自行解决:芬兰医生使用电子健康记录的全国性调查。
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Jan;97:266-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
4
Mind the Gap. A systematic review to identify usability and safety challenges and practices during electronic health record implementation.注意差距。一项旨在识别电子健康记录实施过程中的可用性和安全性挑战及实践的系统综述。
Appl Clin Inform. 2016 Nov 16;7(4):1069-1087. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2016-06-R-0105.
5
A New Informatics Geography.一种新的信息地理学。
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):251-255. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-018.
6
The Unintended Consequences of Health Information Technology Revisited.再谈健康信息技术的意外后果。
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):163-169. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-014.
7
Human Factors for More Usable and Safer Health Information Technology: Where Are We Now and Where do We Go from Here?提升健康信息技术可用性与安全性的人为因素:我们现状如何,未来何去何从?
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):120-125. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-024.
8
Impact of Patient-centered eHealth Applications on Patient Outcomes: A Review on the Mediating Influence of Human Factor Issues.以患者为中心的电子健康应用对患者结局的影响:关于人为因素问题的中介影响的综述
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):113-119. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-031.
9
Are We Ready for the Fourth Industrial Revolution?我们准备好迎接第四次工业革命了吗?
Yearb Med Inform. 2016 Nov 10(1):1-3. doi: 10.15265/IY-2016-052.
10
Understanding and Promoting Effective Engagement With Digital Behavior Change Interventions.理解并促进与数字行为改变干预措施的有效互动。
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Nov;51(5):833-842. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.06.015.