Suppr超能文献

创伤患者中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌对莫匹罗星的耐药模式以及纸片扩散法和E试验在资源匮乏国家更好检测耐药性方面的比较

Resistance pattern of mupirocin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in trauma patients and comparison between disc diffusion and E-test for better detection of resistance in low resource countries.

作者信息

Rajkumari Nonika, Mathur Purva, Bhardwaj Nidhi, Gupta Gunjan, Dahiya Rajrani, Behera Bijayini, Misra Mahesh Chandra

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Division, Jai Prakash Narayan Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Microbiology, Yashoda Superspeciality Hospital, Secunderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Lab Physicians. 2014 Jul;6(2):91-5. doi: 10.4103/0974-2727.141505.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Mupirocin is an effective antibiotic for elimination of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from nasal colonization and has been used to control outbreaks. Current reports show an increasing trend of resistance to this antibiotic.

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to analyze the resistance pattern of MRSA to mupirocin among the patients admitted following trauma to an apex trauma care center of India and to compare the efficacy between two methods of antimicrobial sensitivity testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 150 isolates of MRSA from various clinical samples of trauma patients over a period of 2 years were included in this study. These strains were confirmed for MRSA using VITEK(®) 2 Compact and the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute disc diffusion methods. The mupirocin susceptibility of the strains was tested by using E-test and 5 μg mupirocin disc in parallel each time, and the results were compared.

RESULTS

Clear zones of inhibition were observed in both tests. Though, good correlation was observed between the disc diffusion and E-tests in >98%, E-test showed a tendency to show lower minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) in the remaining. These finding did not affect the final interpretation or outcomes. Of the total 150 strains, 138 (92%) showed sensitivity with the zone size in the range of 30-45 mm by 5 μg disc; rest (8%) showed sensitivity with the zone in the range of 18-30 mm by 5 μg disc, but 143 (95%) showed MIC ≤ 0.094 μg/ml and 8 (5%) gave MIC ≤ 0.75 μg/ml but ≥0.094 μg/ml by E-test. However, when both tests were compared, 5 (3.3%) showed zone size between 14 and 25 mm with ≤0.75 but >0.25 μg/ml MIC; 7 (5%) falling between 25 and 30 mm zone with MIC of ≤0.25 but >0.094 μg/ml and 138 (92%) showed zone >30 mm with MIC ≤0.094 but >0.064 μg/ml.

CONCLUSIONS

All the MRSA isolates in our study were sensitive to mupirocin which is an encouraging finding. Though good screening for sensitivity can be done with 5 μg mupirocin disc, E-test provides a much clear and accurate results in clinical set-up. Hence, disc test can be used in resource poor countries and supplemented with E-test when needed.

摘要

引言

莫匹罗星是一种有效消除鼻腔定植耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的抗生素,已用于控制疫情暴发。目前的报告显示对这种抗生素的耐药性呈上升趋势。

目的

本研究旨在分析印度一家顶级创伤护理中心收治的创伤患者中MRSA对莫匹罗星的耐药模式,并比较两种抗菌药敏试验方法的疗效。

材料与方法

本研究纳入了2年内从创伤患者各种临床样本中分离出的150株MRSA。使用VITEK(®) 2 Compact和临床实验室标准协会纸片扩散法对这些菌株进行MRSA确认。每次同时使用E-test和5 μg莫匹罗星纸片检测菌株对莫匹罗星的敏感性,并比较结果。

结果

两种试验均观察到抑菌圈。虽然,纸片扩散法和E-test之间在>98%的情况下具有良好相关性,但在其余情况下E-test显示最低抑菌浓度(MIC)有较低的趋势。这些发现不影响最终解释或结果。在总共150株菌株中,138株(92%)对5 μg纸片的抑菌圈大小在30 - 45 mm范围内显示敏感;其余(8%)对5 μg纸片的抑菌圈大小在18 - 3 mm范围内显示敏感,但143株(95%)通过E-test显示MIC≤0.094 μg/ml,8株(5%)通过E-test显示MIC≤0.7 μ/ml但≥0.094 μg/ml。然而,当比较两种试验时,5株(3.3%)的抑菌圈大小在14至25 mm之间,MIC≤0.75但>0.25 μg/ml;7株(5%)的抑菌圈在25至30 mm之间,MIC≤0.25但>0.094 μg/ml,138株(92%)的抑菌圈>30 mm,MIC≤0.094但>0.064 μg/ml。

结论

我们研究中的所有MRSA分离株对莫匹罗星敏感,这是一个令人鼓舞的发现。虽然使用5 μg莫匹罗星纸片可以进行良好的敏感性筛查,但E-test在临床环境中提供了更清晰准确的结果。因此,纸片试验可用于资源匮乏的国家,并在需要时辅以E-test。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4181/4196370/4f92d4f9a99c/JLP-6-91-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验