Hua Anh N, Keenan Janice M
University of Denver.
Sci Stud Read. 2014 Jan 1;18(6):415-431. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2014.926906.
Comprehension tests often compare accuracy on inferential versus literal questions and find inferential harder than literal, and poor comprehenders performing worse than controls. Difficulties in integration are assumed to be the reason. This research explores another reason - differences in memory for the passage information underlying the questions. Thirty-nine poor comprehenders and 39 controls were given multiple-paragraph passages, which they retold before answering questions. Retellings permitted assessing question accuracy as a function of memory for the text underlying each question. Inferential accuracy was poorer than literal, and the expected group effect obtained. However, when text memory was perfect, group differences disappeared, indicating that poor comprehenders can generate inferences as well as controls, if they have the relevant information in memory. These findings show that text memory is crucial in distinguishing poor comprehension.
阅读理解测试常常比较推理问题和字面问题的回答准确率,结果发现推理问题比字面问题更难,且阅读理解能力差的人比对照组表现更差。人们认为整合方面的困难是原因所在。本研究探索了另一个原因——问题所基于的文章信息在记忆方面的差异。39名阅读理解能力差的人和39名对照组人员阅读了多篇段落,在回答问题之前先进行复述。复述能够根据对每个问题所基于的文本的记忆来评估问题回答的准确率。推理准确率低于字面准确率,且获得了预期的组间效应。然而,当对文本的记忆完美时,组间差异消失了,这表明如果阅读理解能力差的人在记忆中有相关信息,他们就能和对照组一样进行推理。这些发现表明,文本记忆在区分阅读理解能力差方面至关重要。