Suppr超能文献

在词汇判断任务中对非单词的反应:来自英语词汇项目的见解。

Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.

作者信息

Yap Melvin J, Sibley Daragh E, Balota David A, Ratcliff Roger, Rueckl Jay

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore.

Haskins Laboratories.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):597-613. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000064. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

Abstract

Researchers have extensively documented how various statistical properties of words (e.g., word frequency) influence lexical processing. However, the impact of lexical variables on nonword decision-making performance is less clear. This gap is surprising, because a better specification of the mechanisms driving nonword responses may provide valuable insights into early lexical processes. In the present study, item-level and participant-level analyses were conducted on the trial-level lexical decision data for almost 37,000 nonwords in the English Lexicon Project in order to identify the influence of different psycholinguistic variables on nonword lexical decision performance and to explore individual differences in how participants respond to nonwords. Item-level regression analyses reveal that nonword response time was positively correlated with number of letters, number of orthographic neighbors, number of affixes, and base-word number of syllables, and negatively correlated with Levenshtein orthographic distance and base-word frequency. Participant-level analyses also point to within- and between-session stability in nonword responses across distinct sets of items, and intriguingly reveal that higher vocabulary knowledge is associated with less sensitivity to some dimensions (e.g., number of letters) but more sensitivity to others (e.g., base-word frequency). The present findings provide well-specified and interesting new constraints for informing models of word recognition and lexical decision.

摘要

研究人员已广泛记录了单词的各种统计属性(如词频)如何影响词汇加工。然而,词汇变量对非词决策表现的影响尚不清楚。这种差距令人惊讶,因为更明确地阐述驱动非词反应的机制可能会为早期词汇加工过程提供有价值的见解。在本研究中,对英语词汇项目中近37000个非词的试验级词汇判断数据进行了项目级和参与者级分析,以确定不同心理语言学变量对非词词汇判断表现的影响,并探讨参与者对非词反应方式的个体差异。项目级回归分析表明,非词反应时间与字母数量、正字法邻域数量、词缀数量和基词音节数量呈正相关,与莱文斯坦正字法距离和基词频率呈负相关。参与者级分析还指出了不同项目集之间非词反应在会话内和会话间的稳定性,并且有趣的是,揭示了较高的词汇知识与对某些维度(如字母数量)的较低敏感性相关,但与对其他维度(如基词频率)的较高敏感性相关。本研究结果为词汇识别和词汇判断模型提供了明确且有趣的新限制条件。

相似文献

1
Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):597-613. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000064. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
2
Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):53-79. doi: 10.1037/a0024177. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
3
Individual differences in Cantonese Chinese word recognition: Insights from the Chinese Lexicon Project.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Apr;73(4):504-518. doi: 10.1177/1747021820906566. Epub 2020 Feb 23.
4
Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Nov;43(11):1793-1820. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000411. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Bigram frequency, number of syllables and morphemes and their effects on lexical decision and word naming.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2014 Jun;43(3):241-54. doi: 10.1007/s10936-013-9252-8.
8
Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1550-70. doi: 10.1037/a0014253.
9
Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec;32(6):1324-44. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1324.
10
The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(11):2221-30. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.697176. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming language research from classic desktops to virtual environments.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23118. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08319-1.
3
Word or pseudoword? The lexicality effect in naming and lexical decision tasks during advanced aging.
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0299266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299266. eCollection 2024.
5
How trial-to-trial learning shapes mappings in the mental lexicon: Modelling lexical decision with linear discriminative learning.
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Nov;146:101598. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101598. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
6
7
8
The impact of emotional content on pseudoword recognition.
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):2980-2996. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01454-6. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
9
Transition From Sublexical to Lexico-Semantic Stimulus Processing.
Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Oct 30;14:522384. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.522384. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Lexical decision and the number of morphemes and affixes.
Scand J Psychol. 2013 Oct;54(5):349-52. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12064. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
2
Are CORNER and BROTHER Morphologically Complex? Not in the Long Term.
Lang Cogn Process. 2008 Jan 1;23(7-8):972-1001. doi: 10.1080/01690960802211027. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
3
The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(11):2221-30. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.697176. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
4
How to say "no" to a nonword: a leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jul;38(4):1117-28. doi: 10.1037/a0026948.
5
Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):53-79. doi: 10.1037/a0024177. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
6
The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):287-304. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4.
7
Effects of aging and IQ on item and associative memory.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):464-87. doi: 10.1037/a0023810.
8
Wuggy: a multilingual pseudoword generator.
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):627-33. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.627.
9
The spatial coding model of visual word identification.
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;117(3):713-58. doi: 10.1037/a0019738.
10
Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model.
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Sep;61(2):106-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 May 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验