• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在词汇判断任务中对非单词的反应:来自英语词汇项目的见解。

Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.

作者信息

Yap Melvin J, Sibley Daragh E, Balota David A, Ratcliff Roger, Rueckl Jay

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore.

Haskins Laboratories.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):597-613. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000064. Epub 2014 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1037/xlm0000064
PMID:25329078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4404174/
Abstract

Researchers have extensively documented how various statistical properties of words (e.g., word frequency) influence lexical processing. However, the impact of lexical variables on nonword decision-making performance is less clear. This gap is surprising, because a better specification of the mechanisms driving nonword responses may provide valuable insights into early lexical processes. In the present study, item-level and participant-level analyses were conducted on the trial-level lexical decision data for almost 37,000 nonwords in the English Lexicon Project in order to identify the influence of different psycholinguistic variables on nonword lexical decision performance and to explore individual differences in how participants respond to nonwords. Item-level regression analyses reveal that nonword response time was positively correlated with number of letters, number of orthographic neighbors, number of affixes, and base-word number of syllables, and negatively correlated with Levenshtein orthographic distance and base-word frequency. Participant-level analyses also point to within- and between-session stability in nonword responses across distinct sets of items, and intriguingly reveal that higher vocabulary knowledge is associated with less sensitivity to some dimensions (e.g., number of letters) but more sensitivity to others (e.g., base-word frequency). The present findings provide well-specified and interesting new constraints for informing models of word recognition and lexical decision.

摘要

研究人员已广泛记录了单词的各种统计属性(如词频)如何影响词汇加工。然而,词汇变量对非词决策表现的影响尚不清楚。这种差距令人惊讶,因为更明确地阐述驱动非词反应的机制可能会为早期词汇加工过程提供有价值的见解。在本研究中,对英语词汇项目中近37000个非词的试验级词汇判断数据进行了项目级和参与者级分析,以确定不同心理语言学变量对非词词汇判断表现的影响,并探讨参与者对非词反应方式的个体差异。项目级回归分析表明,非词反应时间与字母数量、正字法邻域数量、词缀数量和基词音节数量呈正相关,与莱文斯坦正字法距离和基词频率呈负相关。参与者级分析还指出了不同项目集之间非词反应在会话内和会话间的稳定性,并且有趣的是,揭示了较高的词汇知识与对某些维度(如字母数量)的较低敏感性相关,但与对其他维度(如基词频率)的较高敏感性相关。本研究结果为词汇识别和词汇判断模型提供了明确且有趣的新限制条件。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/7b5e38c2c1a4/nihms626380f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/dd840e3878b9/nihms626380f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/1daed39b0057/nihms626380f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/891f22352a29/nihms626380f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/70765ad329e9/nihms626380f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/a7fe76916fcd/nihms626380f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/decdb7c57228/nihms626380f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/357a659bcf1a/nihms626380f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/7b5e38c2c1a4/nihms626380f8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/dd840e3878b9/nihms626380f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/1daed39b0057/nihms626380f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/891f22352a29/nihms626380f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/70765ad329e9/nihms626380f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/a7fe76916fcd/nihms626380f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/decdb7c57228/nihms626380f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/357a659bcf1a/nihms626380f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d26f/4404174/7b5e38c2c1a4/nihms626380f8.jpg

相似文献

1
Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.在词汇判断任务中对非单词的反应:来自英语词汇项目的见解。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 May;41(3):597-613. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000064. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
2
Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.个体在视觉词汇识别上的差异:来自英语词汇项目的启示。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):53-79. doi: 10.1037/a0024177. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
3
Individual differences in Cantonese Chinese word recognition: Insights from the Chinese Lexicon Project.粤语单词识别中的个体差异:来自汉语词汇项目的见解。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Apr;73(4):504-518. doi: 10.1177/1747021820906566. Epub 2020 Feb 23.
4
Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.幸存的盲目分解:复杂单词识别时间进程的分布分析。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Nov;43(11):1793-1820. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000411. Epub 2017 Apr 27.
5
Bigram frequency, number of syllables and morphemes and their effects on lexical decision and word naming.双词素频率、音节和语素的数量及其对词汇判断和单词命名的影响。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2014 Jun;43(3):241-54. doi: 10.1007/s10936-013-9252-8.
6
A word or two about nonwords: Frequency, semantic neighborhood density, and orthography-to-semantics consistency effects for nonwords in the lexical decision task.简单谈一谈“非词”:在词汇判断任务中,非词的频率、语义近邻密度和正字法到语义一致性效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Jan;47(1):157-183. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000819. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
7
Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.重新审视视觉单词识别中的词长效应:来自英语词汇项目的新证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):45-52. doi: 10.3758/bf03193811.
8
Re(de)fining the orthographic neighborhood: the role of addition and deletion neighbors in lexical decision and reading.重新定义正字法邻域:加法和减法邻域在词汇判断和阅读中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Oct;35(5):1550-70. doi: 10.1037/a0014253.
9
Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.词汇判断表现的单进程与双进程模型:来自反应时间分布分析的见解
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec;32(6):1324-44. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.6.1324.
10
The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision.词汇判断中的双字母低谷假说与音节数量效应
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(11):2221-30. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.697176. Epub 2012 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Transforming language research from classic desktops to virtual environments.将语言研究从传统桌面环境转变到虚拟环境。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23118. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-08319-1.
2
Dissociating premotor and motor components of response times: Evidence of independent decisional effects during motor-response execution.区分反应时间的运动前成分和运动成分:运动反应执行过程中独立决策效应的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Mar 7. doi: 10.3758/s13423-025-02663-z.
3
Word or pseudoword? The lexicality effect in naming and lexical decision tasks during advanced aging.

本文引用的文献

1
Lexical decision and the number of morphemes and affixes.词汇判断与语素和词缀的数量。
Scand J Psychol. 2013 Oct;54(5):349-52. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12064. Epub 2013 Jul 5.
2
Are CORNER and BROTHER Morphologically Complex? Not in the Long Term.“CORNER”和“BROTHER”在形态上复杂吗?从长远来看并非如此。
Lang Cogn Process. 2008 Jan 1;23(7-8):972-1001. doi: 10.1080/01690960802211027. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
3
The bigram trough hypothesis and the syllable number effect in lexical decision.词汇判断中的双字母低谷假说与音节数量效应
单词还是伪词?高龄人群在命名和词汇判断任务中的词类效应。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 29;19(2):e0299266. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299266. eCollection 2024.
4
Temporal dynamics of oscillatory activity during nonlexical language decoding: Evidence from Morse code and magnetoencephalography.非词汇语言解码过程中振荡活动的时间动态:来自莫尔斯电码和脑磁图的证据。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Dec 1;44(17):6185-6197. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26505. Epub 2023 Oct 4.
5
How trial-to-trial learning shapes mappings in the mental lexicon: Modelling lexical decision with linear discriminative learning.从trial-to-trial 学习看心理词汇中的映射关系:用线性判别学习对词汇判断进行建模。
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Nov;146:101598. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101598. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
6
Understanding preschoolers' word learning success in different scenarios: disambiguation meets statistical learning and eBook reading.理解学龄前儿童在不同场景下的词汇学习成功:消除歧义与统计学习及电子书阅读相结合。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 17;14:1118142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1118142. eCollection 2023.
7
The angular gyrus serves as an interface between the non-lexical reading network and the semantic system: evidence from dynamic causal modeling.角回充当非词汇阅读网络和语义系统之间的接口:来自动态因果建模的证据。
Brain Struct Funct. 2024 Apr;229(3):561-575. doi: 10.1007/s00429-023-02624-z. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
8
The impact of emotional content on pseudoword recognition.情绪内容对假词识别的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Nov;85(8):2980-2996. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01454-6. Epub 2020 Dec 18.
9
Transition From Sublexical to Lexico-Semantic Stimulus Processing.从次词汇到词汇语义刺激处理的转变
Front Syst Neurosci. 2020 Oct 30;14:522384. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2020.522384. eCollection 2020.
10
Perceptual Fluency Affects Judgments of Learning Non-analytically and Analytically Through Beliefs About How Perceptual Fluency Affects Memory.知觉流畅性通过关于知觉流畅性如何影响记忆的信念,非分析性地和分析性地影响学习判断。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 2;11:552824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552824. eCollection 2020.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(11):2221-30. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2012.697176. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
4
How to say "no" to a nonword: a leaky competing accumulator model of lexical decision.如何对非词说“不”:词汇判断中一个有漏洞的竞争累加器模型。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Jul;38(4):1117-28. doi: 10.1037/a0026948.
5
Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.个体在视觉词汇识别上的差异:来自英语词汇项目的启示。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):53-79. doi: 10.1037/a0024177. Epub 2011 Jul 4.
6
The British Lexicon Project: lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words.英国词汇项目:28730 个单音节和双音节英语单词的词汇判断数据。
Behav Res Methods. 2012 Mar;44(1):287-304. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4.
7
Effects of aging and IQ on item and associative memory.年龄和智商对项目和联想记忆的影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Aug;140(3):464-87. doi: 10.1037/a0023810.
8
Wuggy: a multilingual pseudoword generator.Wuggy:一种多语言伪词生成器。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 Aug;42(3):627-33. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.3.627.
9
The spatial coding model of visual word identification.视觉词识别的空间编码模型。
Psychol Rev. 2010 Jul;117(3):713-58. doi: 10.1037/a0019738.
10
Beyond single syllables: large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) model.超越单音节:使用连接主义双过程 (CDP++) 模型进行大规模朗读建模。
Cogn Psychol. 2010 Sep;61(2):106-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001. Epub 2010 May 26.