Suppr超能文献

个体在视觉词汇识别上的差异:来自英语词汇项目的启示。

Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Singapore.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):53-79. doi: 10.1037/a0024177. Epub 2011 Jul 4.

Abstract

Empirical work and models of visual word recognition have traditionally focused on group-level performance. Despite the emphasis on the prototypical reader, there is clear evidence that variation in reading skill modulates word recognition performance. In the present study, we examined differences among individuals who contributed to the English Lexicon Project (http://elexicon.wustl.edu), an online behavioral database containing nearly 4 million word recognition (speeded pronunciation and lexical decision) trials from over 1,200 participants. We observed considerable within- and between-session reliability across distinct sets of items, in terms of overall mean response time (RT), RT distributional characteristics, diffusion model parameters (Ratcliff, Gomez, & McKoon, 2004), and sensitivity to underlying lexical dimensions. This indicates reliably detectable individual differences in word recognition performance. In addition, higher vocabulary knowledge was associated with faster, more accurate word recognition performance, attenuated sensitivity to stimuli characteristics, and more efficient accumulation of information. Finally, in contrast to suggestions in the literature, we did not find evidence that individuals were trading-off their utilization of lexical and nonlexical information.

摘要

传统的视觉词汇识别实证研究和模型一直专注于群体水平的表现。尽管强调了典型读者的作用,但有明确的证据表明,阅读技能的差异会调节词汇识别表现。在本研究中,我们考察了对英语词汇项目(http://elexicon.wustl.edu)有贡献的个体之间的差异,该项目是一个在线行为数据库,包含近 400 万个词汇识别(快速发音和词汇判断)试验,来自 1200 多名参与者。我们观察到,在不同的项目集之间,整体平均反应时间(RT)、RT 分布特征、扩散模型参数(Ratcliff、Gomez 和 McKoon,2004)和对潜在词汇维度的敏感性,都存在相当大的内和会话可靠性。这表明词汇识别表现存在可靠的个体差异。此外,更高的词汇量知识与更快、更准确的词汇识别表现、对刺激特征的敏感性降低以及更有效地积累信息有关。最后,与文献中的建议相反,我们没有发现个体在权衡词汇和非词汇信息的使用的证据。

相似文献

10
A delay in processing for repeated letters: Evidence from megastudies.信件重复处理延迟:来自大型研究的证据。
Cognition. 2019 Aug;189:227-241. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

5
Stratified distributional analysis-a novel perspective on RT distributions.分层分布分析——RT分布的新视角。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Aug;78(8):1740-1756. doi: 10.1177/17470218241288516. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

本文引用的文献

2
What lexical decision and naming tell us about reading.词汇判断和命名能告诉我们关于阅读的哪些信息。
Read Writ. 2012 Jul 1;25(6):1259-1282. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9316-9. Epub 2011 May 29.
4
5
Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.词频对眼动持续时间的分布影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2010 Oct;36(5):1280-93. doi: 10.1037/a0016896.
8
Exploring lexical co-occurrence space using HiDEx.使用 HiDEx 探索词汇共现空间。
Behav Res Methods. 2010 May;42(2):393-413. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.393.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验