Hovis Jeffery K, Milburn Nelda J, Nesthus Thomas E
Civil Aerospace Medical Institute, Federal Aviation Administration, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2014 Nov;85(11):1078-85. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.4060.2014.
This study was conducted to determine whether protans have slower reaction times to red lights than individuals with normal color vision and to identify whether protan reaction times increase differentially in a mildly hypoxic environment.
Simple reaction times (SRT) to a red light-emitting diode (LED) display were measured using the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) at ground (1293 ft/394 m), simulated 12,400-ft (3780-m) altitude, and 20 min after returning to ground. Subjects were 13 individuals with normal color vision (NCV), 12 with a deutan color vision defect, and 4 with a protan color vision defect.
The mean reaction times increased by 8% with altitude and decreased after returning to ground for all groups. However, the reaction times of the protans were often faster than the NCV mean and never below the NCV 10(th) percentile. The only significant difference between color vision groups was the slowest mean reaction time of the NCV group was slower than both the pooled dichromats and pooled anomalous trichromats across all conditions by 23%. The number of lapses did not vary with altitude, but the dichromatic subjects had significantly fewer lapses than the trichromatic subjects across all conditions.
Although protans may be slower to respond to some red warning lights, this decrement in performance could not be demonstrated under the conditions of our experiment. Furthermore, the protan group's simple reaction times were not differentially affected by mild hypoxia. These results suggest that the red LEDs were sufficiently bright for these protan observers.
本研究旨在确定红色盲者对红灯的反应时间是否比正常色觉者慢,并确定红色盲者的反应时间在轻度低氧环境中是否有不同程度的增加。
使用心理运动警觉任务(PVT)测量对红色发光二极管(LED)显示屏的简单反应时间(SRT),测量在地面(1293英尺/394米)、模拟海拔12400英尺(3780米)以及返回地面20分钟后进行。受试者包括13名正常色觉者(NCV)、12名绿色盲色觉缺陷者和4名红色盲色觉缺陷者。
所有组的平均反应时间随海拔升高增加了8%,返回地面后减少。然而,红色盲者的反应时间通常比正常色觉者的平均反应时间快,且从未低于正常色觉者的第10百分位数。色觉组之间唯一显著的差异是,在所有条件下,正常色觉组最慢的平均反应时间比合并的二色视者和合并的异常三色视者慢23%。失误次数不随海拔变化,但在所有条件下,二色视受试者的失误次数明显少于三色视受试者。
尽管红色盲者对某些红色警示灯的反应可能较慢,但在我们的实验条件下未能证明这种性能下降。此外,红色盲组的简单反应时间未受到轻度低氧的不同影响。这些结果表明,对于这些红色盲观察者来说,红色LED灯足够亮。