Xing Mingzhao, Alzahrani Ali S, Carson Kathryn A, Shong Young Kee, Kim Tae Yong, Viola David, Elisei Rossella, Bendlová Bela, Yip Linwah, Mian Caterina, Vianello Federica, Tuttle R Michael, Robenshtok Eyal, Fagin James A, Puxeddu Efisio, Fugazzola Laura, Czarniecka Agnieszka, Jarzab Barbara, O'Neill Christine J, Sywak Mark S, Lam Alfred K, Riesco-Eizaguirre Garcilaso, Santisteban Pilar, Nakayama Hirotaka, Clifton-Bligh Roderick, Tallini Giovanni, Holt Elizabeth H, Sýkorová Vlasta
Mingzhao Xing and Ali S. Alzahrani, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; Kathryn A. Carson, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD; Young Kee Shong and Tae Yong Kim, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea; David Viola and Rossella Elisei, WHO Collaborating Center for the Study and Treatment of Thyroid Diseases and Other Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, University of Pisa, Pisa; Caterina Mian, University of Padua; Federica Vianello, Veneto Institute of Oncology, Instituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Padua; Efisio Puxeddu, University of Perugia, Perugia; Laura Fugazzola, University of Milan and Fondazione IRCCS CàGranda, Milan; Giovanni Tallini, University of Bologna School of Medicine, Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy; Bela Bendlová and Vlasta Sýkorová, Institute of Endocrinology, Prague, Czech Republic; Linwah Yip, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA; R. Michael Tuttle, Eyal Robenshtok, and James A. Fagin, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Agnieszka Czarniecka and Barbara Jarzab, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland; Christine J. O'Neill, Mark S. Sywak, and Roderick Clifton-Bligh, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales; Alfred K. Lam, Griffith University School of Medicine, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; Garcilaso Riesco-Eizaguirre, Hospital La Paz, Health Research Institute, and Hospital Universitario de Móstoles; Garcilaso Riesco-Eizaguirre and Pilar Santisteban, Biomedical Research Institute Alberto Sols, Spanish Council of Research, and Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Hirotaka Nakayama, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan; and Elizabeth H. Holt, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 1;33(1):42-50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.8253. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
To investigate the prognostic value of BRAF V600E mutation for the recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC).
This was a retrospective multicenter study of the relationship between BRAF V600E mutation and recurrence of PTC in 2,099 patients (1,615 women and 484 men), with a median age of 45 years (interquartile range [IQR], 34 to 58 years) and a median follow-up time of 36 months (IQR, 14 to 75 months).
The overall BRAF V600E mutation prevalence was 48.5% (1,017 of 2,099). PTC recurrence occurred in 20.9% (213 of 1,017) of BRAF V600E mutation-positive and 11.6% (125 of 1,082) of BRAF V600E mutation-negative patients. Recurrence rates were 47.71 (95% CI, 41.72 to 54.57) versus 26.03 (95% CI, 21.85 to 31.02) per 1,000 person-years in BRAF mutation-positive versus -negative patients (P < .001), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.82 (95% CI, 1.46 to 2.28), which remained significant in a multivariable model adjusting for patient sex and age at diagnosis, medical center, and various conventional pathologic factors. Significant association between BRAF mutation and PTC recurrence was also found in patients with conventionally low-risk disease stage I or II and micro-PTC and within various subtypes of PTC. For example, in BRAF mutation-positive versus -negative follicular-variant PTC, recurrence occurred in 21.3% (19 of 89) and 7.0% (24 of 342) of patients, respectively, with recurrence rates of 53.84 (95% CI, 34.34 to 84.40) versus 19.47 (95% CI, 13.05 to 29.04) per 1,000 person-years (P < .001) and an HR of 3.20 (95% CI, 1.46 to 7.02) after adjustment for clinicopathologic factors. BRAF mutation was associated with poorer recurrence-free probability in Kaplan-Meier survival analyses in various clinicopathologic categories.
This large multicenter study demonstrates an independent prognostic value of BRAF V600E mutation for PTC recurrence in various clinicopathologic categories.
探讨BRAF V600E突变对甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)复发的预后价值。
这是一项回顾性多中心研究,研究对象为2099例患者(1615例女性和484例男性),他们的年龄中位数为45岁(四分位间距[IQR],34至58岁),中位随访时间为36个月(IQR,14至75个月),研究BRAF V600E突变与PTC复发之间的关系。
BRAF V600E突变的总体患病率为48.5%(2099例中的1017例)。BRAF V600E突变阳性患者中有20.9%(1017例中的213例)发生PTC复发,BRAF V600E突变阴性患者中有11.6%(1082例中的125例)复发。BRAF突变阳性与阴性患者每1000人年的复发率分别为47.71(95%CI,41.72至54.57)和26.03(95%CI,21.85至31.02)(P <.001),风险比(HR)为1.82(95%CI,1.46至2.28),在对患者性别、诊断时年龄、医疗中心和各种传统病理因素进行校正的多变量模型中,该风险比仍具有显著性。在传统低风险疾病I期或II期以及微小PTC患者和PTC的各种亚型中,也发现BRAF突变与PTC复发之间存在显著关联。例如,在BRAF突变阳性与阴性的滤泡样变异型PTC中,患者的复发率分别为21.3%(89例中的19例)和7.0%(342例中的24例),每1000人年的复发率分别为53.84(95%CI,34.34至84.40)和19.47(95%CI,13.05至29.04)(P <.001),校正临床病理因素后的HR为3.20(95%CI,1.46至7.02)。在各种临床病理分类的Kaplan-Meier生存分析中,BRAF突变与较差的无复发生存概率相关。
这项大型多中心研究证明了BRAF V600E突变对各种临床病理分类的PTC复发具有独立的预后价值。