Song Fujian, Loke Yoon, Hooper Lee
Department of Population Health & Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 15;9(10):e110418. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110418. eCollection 2014.
About half of medical and health-related studies are not published. We conducted a systematic review of reports on reasons given by investigators for not publishing their studies in peer-reviewed journals.
MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS (until 13/09/2013), and references of identified articles were searched to identify reports of surveys that provided data on reasons given by investigators for not publishing studies. The proportion of non-submission and reasons for non-publication was calculated using the number of unpublished studies as the denominator. Because of heterogeneity across studies, quantitative pooling was not conducted. Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted.
We included 54 survey reports. Data from 38 included reports were available to estimate proportions of at least one reason given for not publishing studies. The proportion of non-submission among unpublished studies ranged from 55% to 100%, with a median of 85%. The reasons given by investigators for not publishing their studies included: lack of time or low priority (median 33%), studies being incomplete (median 15%), study not for publication (median 14%), manuscript in preparation or under review (median 12%), unimportant or negative result (median 12%), poor study quality or design (median 11%), fear of rejection (median 12%), rejection by journals (median 6%), author or co-author problems (median 10%), and sponsor or funder problems (median 9%). In general, the frequency of reasons given for non-publication was not associated with the source of unpublished studies, study design, or time when a survey was conducted.
Non-submission of studies for publication remains the main cause of non-publication of studies. Measures to reduce non-publication of studies and alternative models of research dissemination need to be developed to address the main reasons given by investigators for not publishing their studies, such as lack of time or low priority and fear of being rejected by journals.
约一半与医学和健康相关的研究未发表。我们对研究者给出的未在同行评审期刊上发表研究的原因报告进行了系统综述。
检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycINFO和SCOPUS(截至2013年9月13日)以及已识别文章的参考文献,以识别提供研究者未发表研究原因数据的调查报告。以未发表研究的数量为分母计算未提交比例和未发表原因。由于研究之间存在异质性,未进行定量合并。进行了探索性亚组分析。
我们纳入了54份调查报告。来自38份纳入报告的数据可用于估计至少给出一个未发表研究原因的比例。未发表研究中未提交的比例在55%至100%之间,中位数为85%。研究者给出的未发表研究的原因包括:时间不足或优先级低(中位数33%)、研究不完整(中位数15%)、研究不适合发表(中位数14%)、稿件正在准备或正在评审(中位数12%)、结果不重要或为阴性(中位数12%)、研究质量或设计不佳(中位数11%)、害怕被拒稿(中位数12%)、被期刊拒稿(中位数6%)、作者或共同作者问题(中位数10%)以及资助者或资助机构问题(中位数9%)。总体而言,未发表原因的频率与未发表研究的来源、研究设计或进行调查的时间无关。
不提交研究以供发表仍然是研究未发表的主要原因。需要制定减少研究未发表的措施和替代的研究传播模式,以解决研究者给出的未发表研究的主要原因,如时间不足或优先级低以及害怕被期刊拒稿。