Chirukandath Ravindran, Sunil Gopika, Balakrishnan Vipin, Menon R Ashitha, Gayathry P Soorya, Sulaiman Sumin V, George Marius, Mohan Keerthana, Maria Joseph Dona
General Surgery, Government Medical College Thrissur, Thrissur, IND.
Dermatology, Government Medical College Thrissur, Thrissur, IND.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 18;16(7):e64787. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64787. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Background The publication of scholarly work in peer-reviewed journals is a well-established method for disseminating knowledge and findings to a global audience. However, the publishing process is constantly evolving and encountering various obstacles that hinder progress. Despite a significant increase in the number of research projects undertaken, there are few studies evaluating the challenges faced by investigators in publishing their research. This study aims to identify the factors and elements that influence the publication process after the completion of research. Methods This study included 759 projects approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) from 2016 to 2021 at a tertiary care centre in South India. A list of these approved projects was analysed for overall output in terms of publication and completion. Investigators were contacted and interviewed using a validated, 15-question survey to identify various factors influencing scientific publications. Results A total of 759 projects approved by the IEC from 2016 to 2021 were analyzed. It was found that only 36.72% of studies were completed by faculty members, and the publication conversion rate was 34.24%. A single-point analysis showed a statistically significant lower conversion rate for resident articles (p = 0.032). The 15-point analysis detailed the factors influencing publication conversion, revealing that the majority of researchers publish based on academic and research interests (68.89% and 72.12%, respectively). Various deterrents to publication, such as study design, statistical analysis, journal selection, and knowledge about journal submission, were identified. Notably, 98.4% of researchers expressed a desire to publish more in the future, highlighting the importance of this study. Conclusion The study highlights areas that require attention to facilitate and augment research. It identifies the real gaps in the publication process and suggests points of intervention needed to enhance the research environment, increase publication rates, and establish demand-based research support units in the medical education sector.
背景 在同行评审期刊上发表学术作品是向全球受众传播知识和研究成果的既定方法。然而,出版过程在不断演变,并遇到各种阻碍进展的障碍。尽管开展的研究项目数量大幅增加,但很少有研究评估研究人员在发表其研究成果时面临的挑战。本研究旨在确定研究完成后影响出版过程的因素和要素。
方法 本研究纳入了印度南部一家三级医疗中心2016年至2021年期间经机构伦理委员会(IEC)批准的759个项目。分析了这些获批项目清单在发表和完成方面的总体产出。使用经过验证的15个问题的调查问卷联系并采访研究人员,以确定影响科学出版物的各种因素。
结果 对2016年至2021年期间经IEC批准的759个项目进行了分析。发现只有36.72%的研究由教职员工完成,出版转化率为34.24%。单点分析显示住院医师文章的转化率在统计学上显著较低(p = 0.032)。15点分析详细阐述了影响出版转化的因素,表明大多数研究人员基于学术和研究兴趣发表文章(分别为68.89%和72.12%)。确定了出版的各种阻碍因素,如研究设计、统计分析、期刊选择以及期刊投稿知识。值得注意的是,98.4%的研究人员表示希望未来发表更多文章,突出了本研究的重要性。
结论 该研究突出了需要关注以促进和加强研究的领域。它确定了出版过程中的实际差距,并提出了加强研究环境、提高出版率以及在医学教育领域建立基于需求的研究支持单位所需的干预点。