• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用拷贝数数据的贝叶斯疾病分类

Bayesian disease classification using copy number data.

作者信息

Guha Subharup, Ji Yuan, Baladandayuthapani Veerabhadran

机构信息

Department of Statistics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.

Center for Biomedical Informatics, North Shore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA. ; Department of Health Studies, The University of Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Inform. 2014 Oct 1;13(Suppl 2):83-91. doi: 10.4137/CIN.S13785. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.4137/CIN.S13785
PMID:25336897
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4196891/
Abstract

DNA copy number variations (CNVs) have been shown to be associated with cancer development and progression. The detection of these CNVs has the potential to impact the basic knowledge and treatment of many types of cancers, and can play a role in the discovery and development of molecular-based personalized cancer therapies. One of the most common types of high-resolution chromosomal microarrays is array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) methods that assay DNA CNVs across the whole genomic landscape in a single experiment. In this article we propose methods to use aCGH profiles to predict disease states. We employ a Bayesian classification model and treat disease states as outcome, and aCGH profiles as covariates in order to identify significant regions of the genome associated with disease subclasses. We propose a principled two-stage method where we first make inferences on the underlying copy number states associated with the aCGH emissions based on hidden Markov model (HMM) formulations to account for serial dependencies in neighboring probes. Subsequently, we infer associations with disease outcomes, conditional on the copy number states, using Bayesian linear variable selection procedures. The selected probes and their effects are parameters that are useful for predicting the disease categories of any additional individuals on the basis of their aCGH profiles. Using simulated datasets, we investigate the method's accuracy in detecting disease category. Our methodology is motivated by and applied to a breast cancer dataset consisting of aCGH profiles assayed on patients from multiple disease subtypes.

摘要

DNA拷贝数变异(CNVs)已被证明与癌症的发生和发展相关。这些CNVs的检测有可能影响多种癌症的基础知识和治疗,并能在基于分子的个性化癌症治疗的发现和发展中发挥作用。基于阵列的比较基因组杂交(aCGH)方法是最常见的高分辨率染色体微阵列类型之一,它能在单个实验中分析整个基因组范围内的DNA CNVs。在本文中,我们提出了利用aCGH图谱预测疾病状态的方法。我们采用贝叶斯分类模型,将疾病状态视为结果,将aCGH图谱视为协变量,以识别与疾病亚类相关的基因组重要区域。我们提出了一种有原则的两阶段方法,首先基于隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)公式对与aCGH信号相关的潜在拷贝数状态进行推断,以考虑相邻探针中的序列依赖性。随后,我们使用贝叶斯线性变量选择程序,在拷贝数状态的条件下推断与疾病结果的关联。所选的探针及其效应是基于aCGH图谱预测任何其他个体疾病类别的有用参数。我们使用模拟数据集研究了该方法在检测疾病类别方面的准确性。我们的方法受到一个乳腺癌数据集的启发,并应用于该数据集,该数据集由对来自多种疾病亚型患者进行检测的aCGH图谱组成。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261d/4196891/bb9b8f84a161/cin-suppl.2-2014-083f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261d/4196891/bb3450b8ce2a/cin-suppl.2-2014-083f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261d/4196891/c8d52f7d3c07/cin-suppl.2-2014-083f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261d/4196891/a3e46fc5dc9f/cin-suppl.2-2014-083f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261d/4196891/bb9b8f84a161/cin-suppl.2-2014-083f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261d/4196891/bb3450b8ce2a/cin-suppl.2-2014-083f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261d/4196891/c8d52f7d3c07/cin-suppl.2-2014-083f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261d/4196891/a3e46fc5dc9f/cin-suppl.2-2014-083f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/261d/4196891/bb9b8f84a161/cin-suppl.2-2014-083f4.jpg

相似文献

1
Bayesian disease classification using copy number data.使用拷贝数数据的贝叶斯疾病分类
Cancer Inform. 2014 Oct 1;13(Suppl 2):83-91. doi: 10.4137/CIN.S13785. eCollection 2014.
2
Bayesian Random Segmentation Models to Identify Shared Copy Number Aberrations for Array CGH Data.用于识别阵列比较基因组杂交数据中共享拷贝数变异的贝叶斯随机分割模型
J Am Stat Assoc. 2010 Dec;105(492):1358-1375. doi: 10.1198/jasa.2010.ap09250.
3
A bayesian analysis for identifying DNA copy number variations using a compound poisson process.一种使用复合泊松过程识别DNA拷贝数变异的贝叶斯分析方法。
EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol. 2010;2010(1):268513. doi: 10.1155/2010/268513. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
4
Flexible and accurate detection of genomic copy-number changes from aCGH.从比较基因组杂交(aCGH)中灵活且准确地检测基因组拷贝数变化。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Jun;3(6):e122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030122. Epub 2007 May 16.
5
DNA Copy Number Selection Using Robust Structured Sparsity-Inducing Norms.使用稳健的结构化稀疏诱导范数进行DNA拷贝数选择
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2014 Jan-Feb;11(1):168-81. doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2013.141.
6
Array comparative genomic hybridization and fetal congenital heart defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.阵列比较基因组杂交与胎儿先天性心脏缺陷:系统评价与荟萃分析
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;45(1):27-35. doi: 10.1002/uog.14695.
7
Array CGH identifies distinct DNA copy number profiles of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes in chromosomal- and microsatellite-unstable sporadic colorectal carcinomas.阵列比较基因组杂交技术可识别染色体不稳定及微卫星不稳定的散发性结直肠癌中癌基因和抑癌基因不同的DNA拷贝数图谱。
J Mol Med (Berl). 2007 Mar;85(3):293-304. doi: 10.1007/s00109-006-0126-5. Epub 2006 Dec 2.
8
New insights in the interpretation of array-CGH: autism spectrum disorder and positive family history for intellectual disability predict the detection of pathogenic variants.阵列比较基因组杂交解读的新见解:自闭症谱系障碍和智力残疾的阳性家族史可预测致病变异的检测。
Ital J Pediatr. 2016 Apr 12;42:39. doi: 10.1186/s13052-016-0246-7.
9
Multiple samples aCGH analysis for rare CNVs detection.用于罕见拷贝数变异检测的多样本阵列比较基因组杂交分析。
J Clin Bioinforma. 2013 Jun 11;3(1):12. doi: 10.1186/2043-9113-3-12.
10
Array-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH).基于微阵列的比较基因组杂交(aCGH)。
Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1541:167-179. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6703-2_15.

引用本文的文献

1
Genomic Amplifications and Distal 6q Loss: Novel Markers for Poor Survival in High-risk Neuroblastoma Patients.基因组扩增和 6q 远端缺失:高危神经母细胞瘤患者不良生存的新标志物。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Oct 1;110(10):1084-1093. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy022.

本文引用的文献

1
Bayesian Hidden Markov Modeling of Array CGH Data.阵列比较基因组杂交数据的贝叶斯隐马尔可夫模型
J Am Stat Assoc. 2008 Jun 1;103(482):485-497. doi: 10.1198/016214507000000923.
2
Making sense of cancer genomic data.解析癌症基因组数据。
Genes Dev. 2011 Mar 15;25(6):534-55. doi: 10.1101/gad.2017311.
3
Genomic microarrays in mental retardation: from copy number variation to gene, from research to diagnosis.基因组微阵列在智力障碍中的应用:从拷贝数变异到基因,从研究到诊断。
J Med Genet. 2010 May;47(5):289-97. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2009.072942. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
4
Molecular characterization of breast cancer with high-resolution oligonucleotide comparative genomic hybridization array.利用高分辨率寡核苷酸比较基因组杂交阵列对乳腺癌进行分子特征分析。
Clin Cancer Res. 2009 Jan 15;15(2):441-51. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1791.
5
Classification and feature selection algorithms for multi-class CGH data.用于多类比较基因组杂交数据的分类和特征选择算法
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 1;24(13):i86-95. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn145.
6
Classification of arrayCGH data using fused SVM.使用融合支持向量机对阵列比较基因组杂交数据进行分类。
Bioinformatics. 2008 Jul 1;24(13):i375-82. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn188.
7
Bayesian covariance selection in generalized linear mixed models.广义线性混合模型中的贝叶斯协方差选择
Biometrics. 2006 Jun;62(2):446-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00499.x.
8
Bayesian variable selection for the analysis of microarray data with censored outcomes.用于分析具有删失结局的微阵列数据的贝叶斯变量选择
Bioinformatics. 2006 Sep 15;22(18):2262-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl362. Epub 2006 Jul 15.
9
Chromosome 5 imbalance mapping in breast tumors from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers and sporadic breast tumors.BRCA1和BRCA2突变携带者的乳腺肿瘤以及散发性乳腺肿瘤中的5号染色体失衡图谱
Int J Cancer. 2006 Sep 1;119(5):1052-60. doi: 10.1002/ijc.21934.
10
A comparison study: applying segmentation to array CGH data for downstream analyses.一项比较研究:将分割应用于阵列比较基因组杂交数据以进行下游分析。
Bioinformatics. 2005 Nov 15;21(22):4084-91. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti677. Epub 2005 Sep 13.