• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估整合照护的工具:系统回顾。

Instruments to assess integrated care: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Integrated Healthcare, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, DK-2400 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Hvidovre University Hospital, Kettegaard Allé 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.

出版信息

Int J Integr Care. 2014 Sep 25;14:e027. eCollection 2014 Jul.

PMID:25337064
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4203116/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although several measurement instruments have been developed to measure the level of integrated health care delivery, no standardised, validated instrument exists covering all aspects of integrated care. The purpose of this review is to identify the instruments concerning how to measure the level of integration across health-care sectors and to assess and evaluate the organisational elements within the instruments identified.

METHODS

An extensive, systematic literature review in PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Web of Science for the years 1980-2011. Selected abstracts were independently reviewed by two investigators.

RESULTS

We identified 23 measurement instruments and, within these, eight organisational elements were found. No measurement instrument covered all organisational elements, but almost all studies include well-defined structural and process aspects and six include cultural aspects; 14 explicitly stated using a theoretical framework.

CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION

This review did not identify any measurement instrument covering all aspects of integrated care. Further, a lack of uniform use of the eight organisational elements across the studies was prevalent. It is uncertain whether development of a single 'all-inclusive' model for assessing integrated care is desirable. We emphasise the continuing need for validated instruments embedded in theoretical contexts.

摘要

简介

尽管已经开发出几种测量工具来衡量整体医疗服务提供的水平,但没有涵盖整合护理所有方面的标准化、经过验证的工具。本研究的目的是确定用于衡量跨医疗保健部门整合程度的工具,并评估和评估确定工具中的组织要素。

方法

在 1980 年至 2011 年间,在 PubMed、CINAHL、PsycINFO、Cochrane Library、Web of Science 中进行了广泛的、系统的文献综述。选择的摘要由两位研究者独立审查。

结果

我们确定了 23 种测量工具,在这些工具中发现了 8 个组织要素。没有一个测量工具涵盖了所有的组织要素,但几乎所有的研究都包括明确界定的结构和过程方面,其中 6 个包括文化方面;14 项明确表示使用了理论框架。

结论和讨论

本综述没有发现任何涵盖整体护理所有方面的测量工具。此外,研究中普遍缺乏对八个组织要素的统一使用。开发一个用于评估综合护理的单一“包罗万象”模型是否可取尚不确定。我们强调需要在理论背景下嵌入经过验证的工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d4b/4203116/5bcb32628bc7/IJIC-14-2014027-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d4b/4203116/5bcb32628bc7/IJIC-14-2014027-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d4b/4203116/5bcb32628bc7/IJIC-14-2014027-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Instruments to assess integrated care: a systematic review.评估整合照护的工具:系统回顾。
Int J Integr Care. 2014 Sep 25;14:e027. eCollection 2014 Jul.
2
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
5
Instruments Measuring Integrated Care: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.衡量综合护理的工具:测量属性的系统评价
Milbank Q. 2016 Dec;94(4):862-917. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12233.
6
A comparative review of measurement instruments to inform and evaluate effectiveness of disability inclusive development.一份关于衡量工具的比较性综述,以了解和评估包容性残疾发展的有效性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(10):804-12. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2013.821178. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
7
Instruments assessing medication literacy in adult recipients of care: A systematic review of measurement properties.评估成年接受治疗者药物知识的工具:测量特性的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103785. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103785. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
10
Psychometric properties of instruments used to measure the cultural competence of nurses: A systematic review.测量护士文化能力的工具的心理测量学特性:系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103789. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103789. Epub 2020 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Readiness and Sustainability for Integrated Care in Ontario, Canada with the Integrated Care Leadership Survey.通过综合护理领导力调查评估加拿大安大略省综合护理的准备情况和可持续性。
Int J Integr Care. 2025 Aug 1;25(3):18. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7539. eCollection 2025 Jul-Sep.
2
Assessing Healthcare Integration: An Integrated Palliative Care System in Spain.评估医疗保健整合:西班牙的综合姑息治疗系统。
Int J Integr Care. 2024 Oct 3;24(4):1. doi: 10.5334/ijic.8613. eCollection 2024 Oct-Dec.
3
Practice and Enlightenment of Chronic Disease Management at the County Level in China from the Perspective of Professional Integration: A Qualitative Case Study of Youxi County, Fujian Province.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring Integration of Cancer Services to Support Performance Improvement: The CSI Survey.衡量癌症服务整合以支持绩效改进:癌症服务整合调查(CSI 调查)
Healthc Policy. 2009 Aug;5(1):35-53.
2
Is the Kaiser Permanente model superior in terms of clinical integration?: a comparative study of Kaiser Permanente, Northern California and the Danish healthcare system.从临床整合的角度来看,凯撒医疗模式是否更优越?——对凯撒医疗、北加利福尼亚和丹麦医疗体系的比较研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 8;10:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-91.
3
Ten key principles for successful health systems integration.
专业整合视角下中国县级慢性病管理的实践与启示:以福建省尤溪县为例的质性研究
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Aug 10;23(3):6. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7550. eCollection 2023 Jul-Sep.
4
Measurement Instruments for Integration within Children and Young People Healthcare Systems and Networks: A Rapid Review of the International Literature.儿童及青少年医疗保健系统和网络中整合使用的测量工具:国际文献快速综述
Int J Integr Care. 2023 May 23;23(2):18. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7028. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
5
Developing evaluation capacities in integrated care projects: Lessons from a scientific support mission implemented in Belgium.在综合护理项目中培养评估能力:在比利时实施的科学支持任务中的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 15;10:958168. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.958168. eCollection 2022.
6
Examining the International Palliative Care Systems in Rural Areas: Protocol for a Comparative Case Study.审视农村地区的国际姑息治疗体系:一项比较案例研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jul 1;11(7):e36037. doi: 10.2196/36037.
7
Measuring Older Peoples' Experiences of Person-Centred Coordinated Care: Experience and Methodological Reflections from Applying a Patient Reported Experience Measure in SUSTAIN.衡量老年人以患者为中心的协调护理体验:在“维持”项目中应用患者报告体验测量法的经验与方法反思
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Jul 13;21(3):3. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5504. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
8
Measuring Processes of Integrated Care for Hospital to Home Transitions.医院到家庭过渡的综合护理测量流程
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Apr 26;21(2):12. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5552.
9
Towards a New System for the Assessment of the Quality in Care Pathways: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.迈向新的医疗照护路径质量评估体系:系统性回顾概述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 20;17(22):8634. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17228634.
10
Validation of the care providers version of the Rainbow Model of Integrated Care-measurement tool in Chinese primary care systems.中文基层医疗系统中“彩虹整合照护模式”照护提供者版测量工具的验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Aug 8;20(1):727. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05562-2.
成功实现卫生系统整合的十条关键原则。
Healthc Q. 2009;13 Spec No(Spec No):16-23. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.21092.
4
All together now: a conceptual exploration of integrated care.现在齐心协力:综合护理的概念性探索。
Healthc Q. 2009;13 Spec No:6-15. doi: 10.12927/hcq.2009.21091.
5
Health systems integration: state of the evidence.卫生系统整合:证据现状。
Int J Integr Care. 2009 Jun 17;9:e82. doi: 10.5334/ijic.316.
6
Integrated care at the crossroads-defining the way forward.整合照护的十字路口:定义前进之路
Int J Integr Care. 2009 Apr 8;9:e10.
7
Conceptualization and measurement of integrated human service networks for evaluation.评估用综合人类服务网络的概念化和测量。
Int J Integr Care. 2007 Dec 20;7:e51. doi: 10.5334/ijic.214.
8
Measurement of integrated healthcare delivery: a systematic review of methods and future research directions.医疗服务整合度的测量:方法的系统评价及未来研究方向。
Int J Integr Care. 2009;9:e01. doi: 10.5334/ijic.305. Epub 2009 Feb 4.
9
A four phase development model for integrated care services in the Netherlands.荷兰综合护理服务的四阶段发展模式。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Mar 4;9:42. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-42.
10
A quality management model for integrated care: results of a Delphi and Concept Mapping study.整合照护的质量管理模型:德尔菲法与概念映射研究的结果
Int J Qual Health Care. 2009 Feb;21(1):66-75. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzn048. Epub 2008 Oct 22.