• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing evaluation capacities in integrated care projects: Lessons from a scientific support mission implemented in Belgium.在综合护理项目中培养评估能力:在比利时实施的科学支持任务中的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 15;10:958168. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.958168. eCollection 2022.
2
Stakeholders' experiences and perception on transitional care initiatives within an integrated care project in Belgium: a qualitative interview study.利益相关者在比利时综合关怀项目中对过渡性关怀举措的体验和看法:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Jan 23;23(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03746-z.
3
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
6
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
7
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Improving the quality of workers' compensation health care delivery: the Washington State Occupational Health Services Project.提高工伤赔偿医疗服务质量:华盛顿州职业健康服务项目。
Milbank Q. 2001;79(1):5-33. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00194.
10
Sustainability in Health care by Allocating Resources Effectively (SHARE) 7: supporting staff in evidence-based decision-making, implementation and evaluation in a local healthcare setting.通过有效分配资源实现医疗保健可持续性(SHARE)7:在当地医疗环境中支持工作人员进行循证决策、实施和评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 21;17(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2388-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary Care Academy: lessons learned from a large-scale innovative primary care project.初级保健学院:从一个大规模创新初级保健项目中吸取的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 13;12:1455810. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1455810. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
What Makes Integration of Chronic Care so Difficult? A Macro-Level Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators in Belgium.是什么让慢性病护理的整合如此困难?比利时障碍与促进因素的宏观层面分析。
Int J Integr Care. 2021 Oct 29;21(4):8. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5671. eCollection 2021 Oct-Dec.
2
Evaluation of a knowledge translation strategy to improve policymaking and practices in health promotion and disease prevention setting in French regions: TC-REG, a realist study.评价一项知识转化策略,以改善法国地区健康促进和疾病预防领域的决策和实践:TC-REG,一项实际研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 30;11(9):e045936. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045936.
3
Integration or Fragmentation of Health Care? Examining Policies and Politics in a Belgian Case Study.医疗保健的整合还是碎片化?比利时案例研究中的政策与政治分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Sep 1;11(9):1668-1681. doi: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.58. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
4
Evaluating Large-Scale Integrated Care Projects: The Development of a Protocol for a Mixed Methods Realist Evaluation Study in Belgium.评估大规模综合护理项目:比利时一项混合方法现实主义评估研究方案的制定
Int J Integr Care. 2020 Sep 24;20(3):12. doi: 10.5334/ijic.5435.
5
Implementation support practitioners - a proposal for consolidating a diverse evidence base.实施支持从业者——整合多样化证据基础的建议
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 May 1;20(1):368. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05145-1.
6
Using developmental evaluation to support knowledge translation: reflections from a large-scale quality improvement project in Indigenous primary healthcare.利用发展性评估支持知识转化:来自一个大型原住民初级卫生保健质量改进项目的反思。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Jul 19;17(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0474-6.
7
Evolving quality improvement support strategies to improve Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle fidelity: a retrospective mixed-methods study.不断发展的质量改进支持策略,以提高计划-实施-研究-行动循环的保真度:一项回顾性混合方法研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 May;28(5):356-365. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007605. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
8
The Funding, Administrative, and Policy Influences on the Evaluation of Primary Prevention Programs in Australia.澳大利亚初级预防项目评价的资金、行政和政策影响。
Prev Sci. 2019 Aug;20(6):959-969. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-00997-4.
9
How to get started in quality improvement.如何开启质量改进工作。
BMJ. 2019 Jan 17;364:k5408. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5437.
10
Values of Integrated Care: A Systematic Review.综合护理的价值:一项系统综述
Int J Integr Care. 2018 Nov 15;18(4):9. doi: 10.5334/ijic.4172.

在综合护理项目中培养评估能力:在比利时实施的科学支持任务中的经验教训。

Developing evaluation capacities in integrated care projects: Lessons from a scientific support mission implemented in Belgium.

机构信息

Department of Public Health, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 15;10:958168. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.958168. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.958168
PMID:36457330
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9706216/
Abstract

The capacity of self-assessment, to learn from experience, to make information-based decisions, and to adapt over time are essential drivers of success for any project aiming at healthcare system change. Yet, many of those projects are managed by healthcare providers' teams with little evaluation capacity. In this article, we describe the support mission delivered by an interdisciplinary scientific team to 12 integrated care pilot projects in Belgium, mobilizing a set of tools and methods: a dashboard gathering population health indicators, a significant event reporting method, an annual report, and the development of a sustainable "learning community." The article provides a reflexive return on the design and implementation of such interventions aimed at building organizational evaluation capacity. Some lessons were drawn from our experience, in comparison with the broader evaluation literature: The provided support should be adapted to the various needs and contexts of the beneficiary organizations, and it has to foster experience-based learning and requires all stakeholders to adopt a learning posture. A long-time, secure perspective should be provided for organizations, and the availability of data and other resources is an essential precondition for successful work.

摘要

自我评估、从经验中学习、基于信息做出决策以及随着时间的推移进行调整的能力,是任何旨在改变医疗保健系统的项目取得成功的关键驱动因素。然而,许多此类项目都是由医疗保健提供者团队管理的,而这些团队的评估能力有限。在本文中,我们描述了一个跨学科科学团队为比利时 12 个综合护理试点项目提供的支持任务,该团队调动了一系列工具和方法:一个收集人口健康指标的仪表板、一个重大事件报告方法、一份年度报告以及一个可持续的“学习社区”的开发。本文对旨在建立组织评估能力的此类干预措施的设计和实施进行了反思性回顾。我们从经验中吸取了一些教训,并与更广泛的评估文献进行了比较:提供的支持应适应受益组织的各种需求和背景,必须促进基于经验的学习,并要求所有利益相关者采取学习的姿态。应为组织提供长期、稳定的视角,并且数据和其他资源的可用性是成功开展工作的必要前提。