Suppr超能文献

自动化液体培养系统会漏检inhA基因启动子区域发生突变的结核分枝杆菌分离株中的异烟肼异质性耐药。

Automated liquid culture system misses isoniazid heteroresistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates with mutations in the promoter region of the inhA gene.

作者信息

Zhang Z, Lu J, Wang Y, Pang Y, Zhao Y

机构信息

Respiratory Diseases Department of Nanlou, Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015 Mar;34(3):555-60. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2262-0. Epub 2014 Oct 26.

Abstract

Heteroresistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates remains the major challenge for phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) methods to detect drug resistance. The aim of this study was to investigate the abilities of phenotypic DST methods to identify the isoniazid (INH) heteroresistance in M. tuberculosis. We found that the broth dilution method was able to detect INH resistance if 0.5 % resistant bacteria with mutations in the katG and oxyR-ahpC regions were present, while the detection limit ranged from 1 to 10 % for the INH-resistant strains harboring inhA mutations, which was associated with the different mutant types. Additionally, MGIT DST was able to find the recommended 1 % INH resistance due to katG mutations. In contrast, MGIT DST detected resistance in suspensions with 20 % resistant bacteria with inhA mutations. Statistical analysis revealed that the ability of the broth dilution method to detect heteroresistance was better than that of the MGIT DST (p = 0.004). When we further pairwise compared the two methods for detecting heteroresistance according to different mutant loci, the broth dilution method found more heteroresistance due to inhA mutations than MGIT DST (p = 0.001), while the differences for katG and oxyR-ahpC mutations were both not statistically significant (p > 0.05). In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that MGIT DST fails to detect INH heteroresistance in M. tuberculosis isolates with mutations in the promoter region of inhA. In addition, the broth dilution method is more sensitive than MGIT DST in finding INH heteroresistance, indicating that this method may serve as an alternative method to detect the heteroresistance of M. tuberculosis.

摘要

结核分枝杆菌分离株中的异质性耐药仍然是表型药物敏感性试验(DST)方法检测耐药性的主要挑战。本研究的目的是调查表型DST方法识别结核分枝杆菌中异烟肼(INH)异质性耐药的能力。我们发现,如果存在0.5%在katG和oxyR-ahpC区域发生突变的耐药菌,肉汤稀释法能够检测出INH耐药,而对于携带inhA突变的INH耐药菌株,检测限为1%至10%,这与不同的突变类型有关。此外,MGIT DST能够检测到因katG突变导致的推荐的1%的INH耐药。相比之下,MGIT DST在含有20%携带inhA突变的耐药菌的悬液中检测到了耐药。统计分析显示,肉汤稀释法检测异质性耐药的能力优于MGIT DST(p = 0.004)。当我们根据不同的突变位点进一步对两种检测异质性耐药的方法进行两两比较时,肉汤稀释法发现因inhA突变导致的异质性耐药比MGIT DST更多(p = 0.001),而katG和oxyR-ahpC突变的差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。总之,我们的研究结果表明,MGIT DST无法检测出inhA启动子区域发生突变的结核分枝杆菌分离株中的INH异质性耐药。此外,肉汤稀释法在发现INH异质性耐药方面比MGIT DST更敏感,表明该方法可作为检测结核分枝杆菌异质性耐药的替代方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验