• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安全设计装置在减少锐器伤方面的有效性。

Effectiveness of safety-engineered devices in reducing sharp object injuries.

作者信息

Lu Y, Senthilselvan A, Joffe A M, Beach J

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1C9, Canada.

Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, Royal Alexandra Hospital and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T5H 3V9, Canada.

出版信息

Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Jan;65(1):39-44. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqu152. Epub 2014 Oct 24.

DOI:10.1093/occmed/kqu152
PMID:25344960
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sharps injuries remain a common factor in occupational exposure of healthcare workers to blood-borne viruses. The extent to which the introduction of safety-engineered devices has been effective in reducing such injuries among healthcare workers is unclear.

AIMS

To investigate the incidence of sharp object injury among healthcare workers in the Capital Health Region of Alberta, Canada and to determine the effectiveness of the introduction of safety- engineered devices in preventing these.

METHODS

All reports of sharp object injuries to Capital Region Workplace Health and Safety offices from healthcare workers 2003-10 were analysed. Rates of sharp object injury were compared before (2006), during (2007-08) and after (2009-10) the introduction of safety-engineered devices, adjusting for other potential risk factors using Poisson regression and log-linear models.

RESULTS

Between 2003 and 2010, a total of 4707 sharp object injuries were reported from 15 healthcare facilities. The sharp object injury rate per 1000 full-time equivalent employees per year declined from 35 before the introduction period to 30 during the introduction period (rate ratio [RR]: 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78, 0.99) among most healthcare workers, but then rebounded again slightly after the intervention. Physician risks showed little change during the period of introduction (odds ratio [OR]: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.85, 1.14) but decreased significantly after the intervention (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71, 0.97).

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of safety-engineered devices was associated with a modest reduction in reported sharp object injuries but this appeared to be relatively short-lived for most workers.

摘要

背景

锐器伤仍是医护人员职业暴露于血源性病原体的常见因素。具有安全设计的器械在降低医护人员此类伤害方面的有效程度尚不清楚。

目的

调查加拿大艾伯塔省首府地区医护人员锐器伤的发生率,并确定引入具有安全设计的器械在预防锐器伤方面的有效性。

方法

分析了2003年至2010年期间医护人员向首府地区职业健康与安全办公室报告的所有锐器伤事件。比较了引入具有安全设计的器械之前(2006年)、期间(2007 - 2008年)和之后(2009 - 2010年)的锐器伤发生率,并使用泊松回归和对数线性模型对其他潜在风险因素进行了调整。

结果

2003年至2010年期间,15家医疗机构共报告了4707起锐器伤事件。在大多数医护人员中,每年每1000名全职等效员工的锐器伤发生率从引入期之前的35降至引入期期间的30(率比[RR]:0.88,95%置信区间[CI]:0.78,0.99),但在干预后又略有反弹。医生的风险在引入期内变化不大(优势比[OR]:0.99,95% CI:0.85,1.14),但在干预后显著降低(OR:0.83,95% CI:0.71,0.97)。

结论

引入具有安全设计的器械与报告的锐器伤适度减少相关,但对大多数工作人员而言,这种减少似乎相对短暂。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of safety-engineered devices in reducing sharp object injuries.安全设计装置在减少锐器伤方面的有效性。
Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Jan;65(1):39-44. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqu152. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
2
Effect of the introduction of an engineered sharps injury prevention device on the percutaneous injury rate in healthcare workers.引入一种工程化锐器伤预防装置对医护人员经皮损伤率的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Feb;28(2):165-70. doi: 10.1086/511699. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
3
Use of gloves and reduction of risk of injury caused by needles or sharp medical devices in healthcare workers: results from a case-crossover study.医护人员使用手套和减少因针或锐器医疗设备造成的损伤的风险:病例交叉研究的结果。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;31(9):908-17. doi: 10.1086/655839.
4
Reducing needlestick injuries through safety-engineered devices: results of a Japanese multi-centre study.通过安全工程设备减少针刺伤:一项日本多中心研究的结果。
J Hosp Infect. 2016 Feb;92(2):147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2015.09.019. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
5
Effect of implementing safety-engineered devices on percutaneous injury epidemiology.实施安全工程设备对经皮损伤流行病学的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2004 Jul;25(7):536-42. doi: 10.1086/502436.
6
How to evaluate sharp safety-engineered devices.如何评估具有锐器安全设计的设备。
Nurs Times. 2008;104(36):42-5.
7
Evaluating sharps safety devices: meeting OSHA's intent. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.评估锐器安全装置:符合美国职业安全与健康管理局的意图。美国职业安全与健康管理局
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001 Jul;22(7):456-8. doi: 10.1086/501934.
8
Needlestick prevention devices: data from hospital surveillance in Piedmont, Italy-comprehensive analysis on needlestick injuries between healthcare workers after the introduction of safety devices.针刺伤预防装置:来自意大利皮埃蒙特医院监测的数据——对安全装置引入后医护人员之间针刺伤情况的综合分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e030576. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030576.
9
Reducing needlesticks and blood exposure: tracking, training, technology.减少针刺伤和血液暴露:追踪、培训与技术。
Hosp Secur Saf Manage. 1999 Mar;19(11):5-10.
10
The impact of U.S. policies to protect healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogens: the critical role of safety-engineered devices.美国保护医护人员免受血源性病原体伤害的政策的影响:安全工程设备的关键作用。
J Infect Public Health. 2008;1(2):62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of different safety-engineered protection mechanisms of port access needles using a lifelike model of vascular access routes.使用血管通路的逼真模型评估端口接入针的不同安全工程保护机制。
Front Med Technol. 2025 Apr 3;7:1505184. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2025.1505184. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparing risk changes of needlestick injuries between countries adopted and not adopted the needlestick safety and prevention act: A meta-analysis.比较采用和未采用《针刺安全与预防法案》的国家之间针刺伤风险变化:一项荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022 Sep;43(9):1221-1227. doi: 10.1017/ice.2021.372. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
3
Devices for preventing percutaneous exposure injuries caused by needles in healthcare personnel.
用于预防医护人员因针头导致的经皮暴露损伤的装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 14;11(11):CD009740. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009740.pub3.