• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国保护医护人员免受血源性病原体伤害的政策的影响:安全工程设备的关键作用。

The impact of U.S. policies to protect healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogens: the critical role of safety-engineered devices.

机构信息

International Healthcare Worker Safety Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA.

出版信息

J Infect Public Health. 2008;1(2):62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jiph.2008.10.002
PMID:20701847
Abstract

In the United States (U.S.), federal legislation requiring the use of safety-engineered sharp devices, along with an array of other protective measures, has played a critical role in reducing healthcare workers' (HCWs) risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens over the last 20 years. We present the history of U.S. regulatory and legislative actions regarding occupational blood exposures, and review evidence of the impact of these actions. In one large network of U.S. hospitals using the Exposure Prevention Information Network (EPINet) sharps injury surveillance program, overall injury rates for hollow-bore needles declined by 34%, with a 51% decline for nurses. The U.S. experience demonstrates the effectiveness of safety-engineered devices in reducing sharps injuries, and the importance of national-level regulations (accompanied by active enforcement) in ensuring wide-scale availability and implementation of protective devices to decrease healthcare worker risk.

摘要

在美国,联邦立法要求使用安全工程设计的锐器,以及一系列其他保护措施,这在过去 20 年中对于降低医疗工作者(HCWs)职业性接触血源性病原体的风险起到了关键作用。我们介绍了美国针对职业性血液暴露的监管和立法行动的历史,并回顾了这些行动的影响证据。在美国一个使用暴露预防信息网络(EPINet)锐器伤害监测项目的大型医院网络中,空心针的总体伤害率下降了 34%,护士的伤害率下降了 51%。美国的经验证明了安全工程设计的器械在减少锐器伤害方面的有效性,以及国家级法规(伴随积极执法)在确保广泛提供和实施保护器械以降低医疗工作者风险方面的重要性。

相似文献

1
The impact of U.S. policies to protect healthcare workers from bloodborne pathogens: the critical role of safety-engineered devices.美国保护医护人员免受血源性病原体伤害的政策的影响:安全工程设备的关键作用。
J Infect Public Health. 2008;1(2):62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2008.10.002. Epub 2008 Nov 26.
2
OSHA bloodborne pathogens rule--revisions and clarifications.职业安全与健康管理局血源性病原体规则——修订与澄清
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002 Mar;23(3):191-4, 196, 198; quiz 200.
3
Bloodborne pathogens. What you need to know--Part I.血源性病原体。你需要了解的内容——第一部分。
AAOHN J. 2003 Jan;51(1):38-45; quiz 46-7.
4
Needlestick and sharps injury prevention.预防针刺伤和锐器伤。
Online J Issues Nurs. 2004 Sep 30;9(3):5.
5
Evaluating sharps safety devices: meeting OSHA's intent. Occupational Safety and Health Administration.评估锐器安全装置:符合美国职业安全与健康管理局的意图。美国职业安全与健康管理局
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2001 Jul;22(7):456-8. doi: 10.1086/501934.
6
Bloodborne pathogens: updating sharps safety.血源性病原体:更新锐器安全措施
J Healthc Prot Manage. 2001 Summer;17(2):68-72.
7
A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategies.锐器伤及其预防策略综述。
J Hosp Infect. 2003 Apr;53(4):237-42. doi: 10.1053/jhin.2002.1378.
8
Comparing non-safety with safety device sharps injury incidence data from two different occupational surveillance systems.比较两个不同职业监测系统的非安全与安全器械锐器伤发生率数据。
J Hosp Infect. 2017 Jun;96(2):195-198. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.021. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
9
Sharp truth: health care workers remain at risk of bloodborne infection.严峻事实:医护人员仍面临血源性病原体感染风险。
Occup Med (Lond). 2015 Apr;65(3):210-4. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqu206. Epub 2015 Feb 6.
10
Safety-engineered devices in 2012: the critical role of healthcare workers in device selection.2012年的安全工程设备:医护人员在设备选择中的关键作用。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Jun;34(6):615-8. doi: 10.1086/670638. Epub 2013 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of different safety-engineered protection mechanisms of port access needles using a lifelike model of vascular access routes.使用血管通路的逼真模型评估端口接入针的不同安全工程保护机制。
Front Med Technol. 2025 Apr 3;7:1505184. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2025.1505184. eCollection 2025.
2
Refocusing on work-based hazards for the anaesthesiologist in a post-pandemic era.在后疫情时代重新关注麻醉医生基于工作的危害。
BJA Open. 2023 Oct 25;8:100234. doi: 10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100234. eCollection 2023 Dec.
3
Prevalence and Characteristics of Needle Stick and Sharp Injuries Among King Salman Armed Forces Hospital Personnel in Tabuk City: A Retrospective Hospital-Based Study.
塔布克市国王萨勒曼武装部队医院工作人员针刺伤和锐器伤的患病率及特征:一项基于医院的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2023 Aug 18;15(8):e43692. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43692. eCollection 2023 Aug.
4
Non-Safety and Safety Device Sharp Injuries-Risk of Incidents, SEDs Availability, Attitudes and Perceptions of Nurses According to Cross-Sectional Survey in Poland.非安全和安全装置锐器伤-根据波兰横断面调查的事件风险、SEDs 可获得性、护士态度和看法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;19(18):11315. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811315.
5
Investigation and Analysis of Sharp Injuries among Health Care Workers from 36 Hospitals in Shandong Province, China.中国山东省 36 家医院医务人员锐器伤调查分析。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jun 11;2021:5698483. doi: 10.1155/2021/5698483. eCollection 2021.
6
Analysing how changes in the health status of healthcare workers affects epidemic outcomes.分析医护人员健康状况的变化如何影响疫情结果。
Epidemiol Infect. 2021 Feb 8;149:e42. doi: 10.1017/S0950268821000297.
7
Long-term immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccine and impact of a booster dose on health care.乙型肝炎疫苗的长期免疫原性及加强剂量对医疗保健的影响。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Mar 20;33:20. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.20. eCollection 2019.
8
The Injection Technique Factor: What You Don't Know or Teach Can Make a Difference.注射技术因素:你所不知道或未传授的内容可能会产生影响。
Clin Diabetes. 2019 Jul;37(3):227-233. doi: 10.2337/cd18-0076.
9
Elimination of Lancet-Related Needlestick Injuries Using a Safety-Engineered Lancet: Experience in a Hospital.使用安全设计的采血针消除与采血针相关的针刺伤:一家医院的经验
Infect Chemother. 2018 Dec;50(4):319-327. doi: 10.3947/ic.2018.50.4.319.
10
Use of safety syringes for administration of local anaesthesia among a sample of UK primary care dental professionals.在英国初级保健牙科专业人员样本中,使用安全注射器进行局部麻醉的情况。
Br Dent J. 2018 Nov 23;225(10):957-961. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.1028.