Suppr超能文献

故障及召回的起搏器和除颤器导线的管理:欧洲心律协会调查结果

Management of malfunctioning and recalled pacemaker and defibrillator leads: results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey.

作者信息

Grazia Bongiorni Maria, Dagres Nikolaos, Estner Heidi, Pison Laurent, Todd Derick, Blomstrom-Lundqvist Carina

机构信息

CardioThoracic and Vascular Department University Hospital-Pisa, Italy

Second Cardiology Department, Attikon University Hospital, University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Europace. 2014 Nov;16(11):1674-8. doi: 10.1093/europace/euu302.

Abstract

The aim of this survey was to describe the different strategies regarding the management of malfunctioning and recalled pacemaker and defibrillator leads across Europe. A questionnaire has been designed to assess the current practice and physician's approach to the management of leads which are faulty, unnecessary, and/or recalled. Responses to the questionnaire were received from 34 hospitals-members of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) electrophysiology (EP) research network. The survey involved both very high and low volume implanting centres, with 85% of the responding centres performing lead extraction. The survey provides a panoramic view of operator's decision making in the field of malfunctioning, recalled, and redundant leads and outlines a common point of view on lead abandonment and factors influencing the decision about lead extraction. The main factors strongly influencing the decision making were patient's age (59%), the presence of the damaged leads (44%), and the lead dwelling time (44%). Regarding the lead abandonment, the main concern (61%) was the potential greater difficulty associated with lead extraction in the future. High volume extracting centres showed a greater propensity to removing the malfunctioning or recalled leads compared with low volume or non-extracting centres. This EP Wire survey gives a snapshot of the operators' approaches and options regarding redundant, malfunctioning, and recalled lead management and may form the basis for future prospective research on this topic.

摘要

本次调查的目的是描述欧洲各地处理起搏器和除颤器故障及召回导线的不同策略。设计了一份问卷,以评估目前对有故障、不必要和/或已召回导线的处理方法及医生的处理方式。收到了来自欧洲心律协会(EHRA)电生理(EP)研究网络34家医院成员对问卷的回复。该调查涉及高植入量和低植入量的中心,85%的回复中心进行导线拔除。该调查全面展示了操作人员在处理故障、召回和多余导线方面的决策过程,并概述了关于导线废弃以及影响导线拔除决策的因素的共同观点。强烈影响决策的主要因素是患者年龄(59%)、存在受损导线(44%)和导线留置时间(44%)。关于导线废弃,主要担忧(61%)是未来导线拔除可能会更困难。与低植入量或非拔除中心相比,高植入量拔除中心更倾向于拔除故障或召回的导线。这份EP Wire调查简要介绍了操作人员处理多余、故障和召回导线管理的方法及选择,可能为该主题未来的前瞻性研究奠定基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验