• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Net Promoter Score--an asset to patient experience surveys?净推荐值——患者体验调查的一项资产?
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3099-109. doi: 10.1111/hex.12297. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
2
The Net Promoter Score (NPS) for Insight Into Client Experiences in Sexual and Reproductive Health Clinics.性健康和生殖健康诊所中客户体验洞察的净推荐值(NPS)。
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2018 Oct 4;6(3):413-424. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-18-00068. Print 2018 Oct 3.
3
Overall scores as an alternative to global ratings in patient experience surveys; a comparison of four methods.整体评分作为患者体验调查中全球评分的替代方法;四种方法的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 19;13:479. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-479.
4
People with limiting long-term conditions report poorer experiences and more problems with hospital care.患有长期限制性疾病的人表示就医体验较差,且在医院护理方面存在更多问题。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jan 23;14:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-33.
5
Do 360-degree feedback survey results relate to patient satisfaction measures?360度反馈调查结果与患者满意度指标有关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 May;473(5):1590-7. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3981-3.
6
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures in Peru: a cross-sectional study of satisfaction and net promoter score using the 2016 EnSuSalud survey.评估秘鲁的患者报告结局测量指标:使用 2016 年 EnSuSalud 调查评估满意度和净推荐值的横断面研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 Aug;31(8):599-608. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014095. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
7
Patient experiences of inpatient hospital care: a department matter and a hospital matter.患者住院护理体验:科室层面及医院层面的问题
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Feb;27(1):17-25. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzu090. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
8
Contribution of HCAHPS Specific Care Experiences to Global Ratings Varies Across 7 Countries: What Can be Learned for Reporting These Global Ratings?HCAHPS 特定护理体验对全球评分的贡献因 7 个国家而异:从这些全球评分报告中可以学到什么?
Med Care. 2019 Nov;57(11):e65-e72. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001077.
9
Patients' perception of hospital care in the United States.美国患者对医院护理的看法。
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1921-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0804116.
10
The measurement of patients' expectations for health care: a review and psychometric testing of a measure of patients' expectations.患者对医疗保健期望的测量:对患者期望测量的综述和心理测量学测试。
Health Technol Assess. 2012 Jul;16(30):i-xii, 1-509. doi: 10.3310/hta16300.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing the Postcataract Patient Journey Using AI-Driven Teleconsultation: Prospective Case Study.使用人工智能驱动的远程会诊优化白内障术后患者就医流程:前瞻性案例研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Aug 18;9:e72574. doi: 10.2196/72574.
2
Hotspotters Project: a study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster RCT on the cost-effectiveness of 12-month proactive, integrated and personalised care for patients with problems on multiple life domains and high acute care use.热点人群项目:一项阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验的研究方案,该试验旨在探究针对多个生活领域存在问题且急性护理使用率高的患者,提供为期12个月的主动、综合和个性化护理的成本效益。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 10;15(8):e087940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087940.
3
Impact of Telehealth on Pediatric Direct Primary Care: Is Virtually Showing Up Valuable?远程医疗对儿科直接初级保健的影响:虚拟就诊是否有价值?
Cureus. 2025 Jun 16;17(6):e86122. doi: 10.7759/cureus.86122. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Evaluation of the Costs and Consequences of Implementing an Optimization Process for Low-Complexity Emergency Care: The LINEA Program.评估实施低复杂度急诊护理优化流程的成本与后果:LINEA项目。
J Health Econ Outcomes Res. 2025 May 30;12(1):207-212. doi: 10.36469/001c.130031. eCollection 2025.
5
Rheumatic? A diagnostic decision support tool for individuals suspecting rheumatic diseases: Mixed-methods usability and acceptability study.风湿性?一种针对疑似风湿性疾病患者的诊断决策支持工具:混合方法的可用性和可接受性研究。
BMC Rheumatol. 2025 May 23;9(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s41927-025-00507-w.
6
Telehealth Initiative to Enhance Primary Care Access in Brazil (UBS+Digital Project): Multicenter Prospective Study.巴西加强初级医疗服务可及性的远程医疗倡议(UBS + 数字项目):多中心前瞻性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 29;27:e68434. doi: 10.2196/68434.
7
Shared Decision-Making (SDM) for Female SUI: Current Practice in Three Western Countries.女性压力性尿失禁的共同决策(SDM):三个西方国家的当前实践
Int Urogynecol J. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1007/s00192-025-06147-5.
8
Experiences of participants with undiagnosed diseases and hereditary cancers during the initial phase of the Hong Kong genome project: a mixed-methods study.香港基因组计划初始阶段未确诊疾病和遗传性癌症参与者的经历:一项混合方法研究
Hum Genomics. 2025 Apr 5;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s40246-025-00746-5.
9
Provision, cough efficacy and treatment satisfaction of mechanical insufflation-exsufflation in a large multicenter cohort of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.大型多中心肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者队列中机械通气-呼气的提供、咳嗽疗效及治疗满意度
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 1;15(1):7360. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91692-8.
10
Promoters and Detractors Identify Virtual Care as "Worlds Better than Nothing": A Qualitative Study of Participating Veterinarians' Perception of Virtual Care as a Tool for Providing Access.支持者和反对者都认为虚拟护理“聊胜于无”:一项关于参与研究的兽医对虚拟护理作为一种提供服务途径工具的看法的定性研究
Vet Sci. 2025 Feb 7;12(2):136. doi: 10.3390/vetsci12020136.

本文引用的文献

1
Overall scores as an alternative to global ratings in patient experience surveys; a comparison of four methods.整体评分作为患者体验调查中全球评分的替代方法;四种方法的比较。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Nov 19;13:479. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-479.
2
Can hospital cultural competency reduce disparities in patient experiences with care?医院的文化能力能否减少患者在医疗体验方面的差异?
Med Care. 2012 Nov;50 Suppl(0):S48-55. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182610ad1.
3
Consumers' interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches.消费者对医疗保健质量比较信息的解读和使用:呈现方式的影响。
Health Expect. 2012 Jun;15(2):197-211. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00671.x. Epub 2011 May 25.
4
Structure, process or outcome: which contributes most to patients' overall assessment of healthcare quality?结构、过程还是结果:哪个对患者对医疗保健质量的整体评估贡献最大?
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Apr;20(4):326-31. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.042358. Epub 2011 Feb 21.
5
Do patient experiences on priority aspects of health care predict their global rating of quality of care? A study in five patient groups.患者在医疗保健优先方面的体验是否能预测其对整体医疗质量的评价?五个患者群体的研究。
Health Expect. 2010 Sep;13(3):285-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2010.00591.x. Epub 2010 Jun 9.
6
The Dutch consumer quality index: an example of stakeholder involvement in indicator development.荷兰消费者质量指数:利益相关者参与指标制定的一个范例。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 6;10:88. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-88.
7
How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews.医疗保健消费者如何处理和评估比较性医疗保健信息?一项使用认知访谈的定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov 20;9:423. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-423.
8
Dutch healthcare reform: did it result in performance improvement of health plans? A comparison of consumer experiences over time.荷兰医疗改革:是否提高了医保计划的绩效?基于消费者体验的纵向比较
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Sep 17;9:167. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-167.
9
Going Dutch--managed-competition health insurance in the Netherlands.各自付费——荷兰的管理式竞争医疗保险
N Engl J Med. 2007 Dec 13;357(24):2421-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp078199.
10
Consumer choice in Dutch health insurance after reform.改革后荷兰医疗保险中的消费者选择
Health Care Anal. 2006 Mar;14(1):37-49. doi: 10.1007/s10728-006-0010-z.

净推荐值——患者体验调查的一项资产?

The Net Promoter Score--an asset to patient experience surveys?

作者信息

Krol Maarten W, de Boer Dolf, Delnoij Diana M, Rademakers Jany J D J M

机构信息

Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

TRANZO, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):3099-109. doi: 10.1111/hex.12297. Epub 2014 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12297
PMID:25345554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5810704/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the search for more straightforward ways of summarizing patient experiences and satisfaction, there is growing interest in the Net Promoter Score (NPS): How likely is it that you would recommend our company to a friend or colleague?

OBJECTIVE

To assess what the NPS adds to patient experience surveys. The NPS was tested against three other constructs already used in current surveys to summarize patient experiences and satisfaction: global ratings, recommendation questions and overall scores calculated from patient experiences. To establish whether the NPS is a valid measure for summarizing patient experiences, its association with these experiences should be assessed.

METHODS

Associations between the NPS and the three other constructs were assessed and their distributions were compared. Also, the association between the NPS and patient experiences was assessed. Data were used from patient surveys of inpatient hospital care (N = 6018) and outpatient hospital care (N = 10 902) in six Dutch hospitals.

RESULTS

Analyses showed that the NPS was moderately to strongly correlated with the other three constructs. However, their distributions proved distinctly different. Furthermore, the patient experiences from the surveys showed weaker associations with the NPS than with the global rating and the overall score.

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the limited extent to which the NPS reflects the survey results, it seems less valid as a summary of patient experiences than a global rating, the existing recommendation question or an overall score calculated from patient experiences. In short, it is still unclear what the NPS specifically adds to patient experience surveys.

摘要

背景

在寻求更直接的方式来总结患者体验和满意度时,净推荐值(NPS)越来越受到关注:你向朋友或同事推荐我们公司的可能性有多大?

目的

评估NPS对患者体验调查的补充作用。将NPS与当前调查中已用于总结患者体验和满意度的其他三个指标进行比较:整体评分、推荐问题以及根据患者体验计算得出的总体得分。为确定NPS是否是总结患者体验的有效指标,应评估其与这些体验的关联。

方法

评估NPS与其他三个指标之间的关联,并比较它们的分布情况。此外,还评估了NPS与患者体验之间的关联。数据来自荷兰六家医院的住院患者护理(N = 6018)和门诊患者护理(N = 10902)的患者调查。

结果

分析表明,NPS与其他三个指标中度至高度相关。然而,它们的分布明显不同。此外,调查中的患者体验与NPS的关联比与整体评分和总体得分的关联弱。

结论

由于NPS反映调查结果的程度有限,作为患者体验的总结,它似乎不如整体评分、现有的推荐问题或根据患者体验计算得出的总体得分有效。简而言之,NPS对患者体验调查具体有何补充作用仍不明确。