Yoon Young Moon, Han Seong Rok, Lee Seung Jun, Choi Chan Young, Sohn Moon Jun, Lee Chae Heuck
Department of Neurosurgery, Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.
Korean J Spine. 2014 Sep;11(3):109-12. doi: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.109. Epub 2014 Sep 30.
Cervical radicular pain is defined as pain arising in the arm caused by irritation of a cervical spinal nerve or its roots. Although many treatment modalities are described in the literature, the available evidence for efficacy is not sufficient to allow definitive conclusions. The goal of this study was to establish the benefits and prognostic factors of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) on the adjacent cervical dorsal root ganglia (DRG) of cervical radicular pain patients.
A retrospective study of PRF treatment of patients with cervical radicular pain was carried out. Two times diagnostic block of cervical DRG were performed before PRF. PRF was applied for 2 minutes at a setting of 2 Hz and 45 V by two times on the same targets, with the end point being an electrode tip temperature 42℃. Numerical rating scale (NRS) score was evaluated post-treatment 2 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months, which were compared with pretreatment value. A successful outcome was defined that NRS change was improved more than 50% at 6 months.
The mean age was 54 years. The success rate was 68%(15/22) after six months of follow-up. PRF induced complications were not observed. Between success and failure group, we do not find any positive outcome prognostic factor. Interestingly, PRF treatment on foraminal stenosis is better outcome than herniated cervical disc.
PRF on adjacent cervical DRG is effective and safe treatment option for cervical radicular pain patients. However, more long-term follow up and larger patients are needed to establish effectiveness PRF treatment on cervical radicular pain patients.
颈神经根性疼痛定义为由颈脊神经或其神经根受刺激引起的上肢疼痛。尽管文献中描述了许多治疗方法,但关于疗效的现有证据不足以得出明确结论。本研究的目的是确定脉冲射频(PRF)对颈神经根性疼痛患者相邻颈背根神经节(DRG)的益处和预后因素。
对接受PRF治疗的颈神经根性疼痛患者进行回顾性研究。在PRF治疗前对颈DRG进行两次诊断性阻滞。在相同靶点上以2Hz和45V的设置进行两次PRF治疗,每次2分钟,终点为电极尖端温度42℃。在治疗后2周、1个月、3个月和6个月评估数字评分量表(NRS)评分,并与治疗前值进行比较。成功的结果定义为6个月时NRS变化改善超过50%。
平均年龄为54岁。随访6个月后的成功率为68%(15/22)。未观察到PRF引起的并发症。在成功组和失败组之间,我们未发现任何阳性结果的预后因素。有趣的是,PRF治疗椎间孔狭窄的效果优于颈椎间盘突出症。
对相邻颈DRG进行PRF是颈神经根性疼痛患者有效且安全的治疗选择。然而,需要更多的长期随访和更大规模的患者来确定PRF治疗颈神经根性疼痛患者的有效性。