• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者对向全科医生提供粪便样本的看法:一项定性研究。

Patients' perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Lecky Donna M, Hawking Meredith K D, McNulty Cliodna A M

机构信息

Public Health England Primary Care Unit, Gloucester.

出版信息

Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Nov;64(628):e684-93. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682261.

DOI:10.3399/bjgp14X682261
PMID:25348992
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4220220/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stool specimen collection is challenging and informal feedback has indicated that participants find the process difficult. Increasing stool specimen returns would improve the investigation of outbreaks of diarrhoeal and food-borne disease.

AIM

To explore the barriers to stool sample collection and specimen return to ascertain which factors may help to improve the process.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Qualitative patient interview study in Gloucester, UK.

METHOD

A two-stage purposive sampling process was used to identify patients who had either previous experience or no experience of collecting a stool sample. The interview schedule, based on the theory of planned behaviour, was used to facilitate interviews with 26 patients. Interview transcripts were analysed using a modified framework analysis.

RESULTS

Barriers to collection included embarrassment, fear of results, concerns around hygiene and contamination, discretion and privacy, and lack of information. Personal gain was identified as the main incentive to collecting and returning a stool sample. The need for an information leaflet on stool collection was emphasised by most patients.

CONCLUSIONS

GPs could make a number of small changes that could make a big difference for patients and potentially increase stool sample return. If they, rather than receptionists, distributed collection kits it may be easier for patients to ask any questions they had regarding collection. In addition, the provision of a stool-collection information leaflet could increase patients' confidence regarding collecting the sample, and providing drop-off boxes for specimens could help prevent patients' embarrassment regarding handing their stool over to a receptionist.

摘要

背景

粪便样本采集具有挑战性,非正式反馈表明参与者认为该过程困难。提高粪便样本回收率将有助于改善对腹泻和食源性疾病暴发的调查。

目的

探讨粪便样本采集和样本回收的障碍,以确定哪些因素可能有助于改进该过程。

设计与地点

英国格洛斯特的定性患者访谈研究。

方法

采用两阶段目的抽样法,确定有或无粪便样本采集经验的患者。基于计划行为理论的访谈提纲用于对26名患者进行访谈。访谈记录采用改良的框架分析法进行分析。

结果

采集障碍包括尴尬、对结果的恐惧、对卫生和污染问题的担忧、谨慎和隐私以及信息不足。个人利益被确定为采集和返还粪便样本的主要动机。大多数患者强调需要一份关于粪便采集的信息传单。

结论

全科医生可以做出一些小的改变,这可能会给患者带来很大的不同,并有可能提高粪便样本回收率。如果由他们而不是接待员分发采集试剂盒,患者可能更容易就采集问题提出任何疑问。此外,提供一份粪便采集信息传单可以增强患者采集样本的信心,设置样本投递箱有助于避免患者因将粪便交给接待员而感到尴尬。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84c/4220220/c7582934ea84/bjgpNov-2014-64-628-e684-OA-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84c/4220220/f43aa3483312/bjgpNov-2014-64-628-e684-OA-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84c/4220220/dd4d8b485974/bjgpNov-2014-64-628-e684-OA-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84c/4220220/c7582934ea84/bjgpNov-2014-64-628-e684-OA-3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84c/4220220/f43aa3483312/bjgpNov-2014-64-628-e684-OA-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84c/4220220/dd4d8b485974/bjgpNov-2014-64-628-e684-OA-2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a84c/4220220/c7582934ea84/bjgpNov-2014-64-628-e684-OA-3.jpg

相似文献

1
Patients' perspectives on providing a stool sample to their GP: a qualitative study.患者对向全科医生提供粪便样本的看法:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Nov;64(628):e684-93. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X682261.
2
Stool submission by general practitioners in SW England - when, why and how? A qualitative study.英格兰西南部全科医生粪便送检情况——何时、为何以及如何进行?一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Aug 8;13:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-77.
3
Use of stool collection kits delivered to patients can improve confirmation of etiology in foodborne disease outbreaks.向患者提供粪便采集试剂盒有助于提高食源性疾病暴发中病因的确诊率。
Clin Infect Dis. 2004 Nov 15;39(10):1454-9. doi: 10.1086/425319. Epub 2004 Oct 25.
4
Barriers to stool specimen collection during foodborne and enteric illness outbreak investigations in Arizona and Colorado.在亚利桑那州和科罗拉多州进行食源性和肠道疾病暴发调查期间采集粪便样本的障碍。
J Food Prot. 2023 Jan;86(1):100012. doi: 10.1016/j.jfp.2022.11.004. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
5
Informing future research for carriage of multiresistant Gram-negative bacteria: problems with recruiting to an English stool sample community prevalence study.为多重耐药革兰氏阴性菌携带情况的未来研究提供信息:英国粪便样本社区患病率研究的招募问题。
BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 10;7(12):e017947. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017947.
6
Exploring Patients' Views Toward Giving Web-Based Feedback and Ratings to General Practitioners in England: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.探索英格兰患者对向全科医生提供基于网络的反馈和评级的看法:一项定性描述性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Aug 5;18(8):e217. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5865.
7
Exploring biorepository donation patterns, experiences, and recommendations: a mixed-methods study among Appalachian adults enrolled in a sugary drink reduction program.探索生物库捐赠模式、经验和建议:一项针对参加含糖饮料减少计划的阿巴拉契亚成年人的混合方法研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 9;12:1371768. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1371768. eCollection 2024.
8
'Treading water but drowning slowly': what are GPs' experiences of living and working with mental illness and distress in England? A qualitative study.“如履薄冰却逐渐溺水”:英国全科医生在生活和工作中经历的精神疾病和困扰是什么?一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 May 3;8(5):e018620. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018620.
9
Public acceptability of a technology-mediated stool sample collection platform to inform community-based surveillance of infectious intestinal disease: a pilot study.一种基于技术的粪便样本采集平台在社区感染性肠道疾病监测中的公众接受度:一项试点研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 13;22(1):958. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13307-5.
10
Elderly patients' and GPs' perspectives of patient-GP communication concerning polypharmacy: a qualitative interview study.老年患者及全科医生对多药合用情况下医患沟通的看法:一项定性访谈研究
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Jul;19(4):355-364. doi: 10.1017/S1463423617000883. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Rectal swabs vs bulk faeces PCR testing for the diagnosis of enteric conditions (RecSwabFaeces): Protocol for a single group diagnostic accuracy comparative trial.直肠拭子与粪便样本聚合酶链反应检测用于肠道疾病诊断的比较研究(RecSwabFaeces):单组诊断准确性比较试验方案
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 22;20(8):e0329643. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329643. eCollection 2025.
2
Salivary Calprotectin as a Biomarker in Early Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Pilot Study.唾液钙卫蛋白作为早发性炎症性肠病的生物标志物:一项初步研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 14;14(12):4232. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124232.
3
Perceived usability, acceptability, and feasibility of stool-based qPCR TB diagnostics: perspectives from healthcare providers in Manhiça District, southern Mozambique.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of suspected infectious diarrhoea by English GPs: are they right?英国家庭医生诊治疑似感染性腹泻的管理方法:他们做对了吗?
Br J Gen Pract. 2014 Jan;64(618):e24-30. doi: 10.3399/bjgp14X676429.
2
Anticipated regret to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening in Scotland (ARTICS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.预期遗憾增加苏格兰结直肠癌筛查参与率(ARTICS):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Sep 16;13:849. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-849.
3
The Patients Association wake-up call to primary health care.
基于粪便的qPCR结核病诊断方法的感知可用性、可接受性和可行性:来自莫桑比克南部曼希卡区医疗服务提供者的观点
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 May 26;25(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-11117-9.
4
Increasing our knowledge about the epidemiology of in Nunavik's Inuit population (Québec, Canada) using 2017 cross-sectional survey.利用2017年横断面调查增加我们对努纳维克因纽特人群(加拿大魁北克)流行病学的了解。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2024 Dec;83(1):2398864. doi: 10.1080/22423982.2024.2398864. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
5
3D printed rectal swabs for assessing the gut microbiome, metabolome and inflammation.3D 打印直肠拭子用于评估肠道微生物组、代谢组和炎症。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 18;14(1):16613. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-67457-0.
6
Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease: a practical guide.炎症性肠病中的生物标志物:实用指南
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2024 May 9;17:17562848241251600. doi: 10.1177/17562848241251600. eCollection 2024.
7
Rejection of Fecal Immunochemical Tests Within the Lower Gastrointestinal Diagnostic Pathway: A Cohort Study.下消化道诊断途径中粪便免疫化学检测的拒绝:一项队列研究。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241228161. doi: 10.1177/21501319241228161.
8
Are we missing pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in 'at-risk' groups? Prospective assessment of the current practice and yield of faecal elastase testing in patients with diabetes mellitus, HIV and/or high alcohol intake.我们是否遗漏了“高危”人群的胰腺外分泌不足?前瞻性评估糖尿病、HIV 和/或大量饮酒患者中粪便弹性蛋白酶检测的现行做法和检出率。
Clin Med (Lond). 2023 Nov;23(6):588-593. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2023-0185.
9
Soil-transmitted helminth surveillance in Benin: A mixed-methods analysis of factors influencing non-participation in longitudinal surveillance activities.贝宁土壤传播蠕虫监测:影响纵向监测活动参与情况的多因素混合方法分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023 Jan 10;17(1):e0010984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010984. eCollection 2023 Jan.
10
Facilitators and barriers to colorectal cancer screening using the immunochemical faecal occult blood test among an average-risk population in semi-rural Malaysia: A qualitative study.在马来西亚半农村地区的普通风险人群中使用免疫化学粪便潜血试验进行结直肠癌筛查的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 29;17(12):e0279489. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279489. eCollection 2022.
患者协会对初级医疗保健的警钟。
Br J Nurs. 2012;21(19):1176-7. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2012.21.19.1176.
4
Stool submission by general practitioners in SW England - when, why and how? A qualitative study.英格兰西南部全科医生粪便送检情况——何时、为何以及如何进行?一项定性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Aug 8;13:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-77.
5
Front desk talk: discourse analysis of receptionist-patient interaction.前台对话:对医患互动的话语分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2009 Aug;59(565):e260-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp09X453774. Epub 2009 Jun 15.
6
Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests.英国开展第一百万次肠癌筛查测试后,该筛查项目的结果。
Gut. 2012 Oct;61(10):1439-46. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300843. Epub 2011 Dec 7.
7
Comparison of breast and bowel cancer screening uptake patterns in a common cohort of South Asian women in England.比较英格兰南亚裔妇女中常见队列的乳腺癌和肠癌筛查参与模式。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr 27;10:103. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-103.
8
Determinants of participation in colorectal cancer screening with faecal occult blood testing.参与粪便潜血检测筛查结直肠癌的决定因素。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2010 Sep;32(3):395-405. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdp115. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
9
Association between patients' recommendation of their GP and their evaluation of the GP.患者对其全科医生的推荐与其对该全科医生的评价之间的关联。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(4):228-34. doi: 10.1080/02813430802294886.
10
Patient choice in general practice: the implications of patient satisfaction surveys.全科医疗中的患者选择:患者满意度调查的影响
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008 Apr;13(2):67-72. doi: 10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007055.