Dionysopoulos D, Papadopoulos C, Koliniotou-Koumpia E
Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Int J Biomater. 2014;2014:148057. doi: 10.1155/2014/148057. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
Aim. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different restoration techniques on the formation of internal microgaps between materials and dentin in class V restorations. Materials and Methods. Twenty-five extracted human premolars were prepared with standardized class V cavity outlines (3 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm). The cavities were randomly divided into 5 groups of 10 cavities each and restored according to manufacturer's instructions: Group 1: preheating (55°C) conventional composite (Filtek Z250), Group 2: flowable composite (Filtek Flow), Group 3: Filtek Flow + Filtek Z250 light-cured separately, Group 4: Filtek Flow + Filtek Z250 light-cured simultaneously, and Group 5 (control): Filtek Z250 at room temperature (23°C). The specimens were then thermocycled and cross-sectioned through the center of the restoration. Subsequently, impressions were taken, and epoxy resin replicas were made. The internal adaptation of the materials to the axial wall was analyzed under SEM. Results. The preheated Filtek Z250 (Group 1) showed better internal adaptation than the room temperature groups (P < 0.05). The combination of Filtek Flow with Filtek Z250 which was light-cured separately (Group 3) exhibited better internal adaptation than control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion. Different restoration techniques exhibit different behavior regarding internal adaptation to dentin after photopolymerization.
目的。本研究的目的是评估不同修复技术对V类洞修复中材料与牙本质之间内部微间隙形成的影响。材料与方法。选用25颗拔除的人类前磨牙,制备标准化的V类洞型(3毫米×2毫米×2毫米)。将洞随机分为5组,每组10个洞,并按照制造商的说明进行修复:第1组:预热(55°C)传统复合树脂(Filtek Z250);第2组:流动复合树脂(Filtek Flow);第3组:Filtek Flow + Filtek Z250分别光固化;第4组:Filtek Flow + Filtek Z250同时光固化;第5组(对照组):室温(23°C)下的Filtek Z250。然后对标本进行热循环处理,并在修复体中心进行横截面切片。随后,制取印模,并制作环氧树脂复制品。在扫描电子显微镜下分析材料与轴向壁的内部适应性。结果。预热的Filtek Z250(第1组)显示出比室温组更好的内部适应性(P < 0.05)。Filtek Flow与Filtek Z250分别光固化的组合(第3组)表现出比对照组更好的内部适应性(P < 0.05)。结论。不同的修复技术在光聚合后对牙本质的内部适应性方面表现出不同的行为。