• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

代谢/糖尿病手术有多安全?

How safe is metabolic/diabetes surgery?

机构信息

Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Feb;17(2):198-201. doi: 10.1111/dom.12405. Epub 2014 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1111/dom.12405
PMID:25352176
Abstract

Although recent studies have shown the impressive antidiabetic effects of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), the safety profile of metabolic/diabetes surgery has been a matter of concern among patients and physicians. Data on patients with type 2 diabetes who underwent LRYGB or one of seven other procedures between January 2007 and December 2012 were retrieved from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and compared. Of the 66 678 patients included, 16 509 underwent LRYGB. The composite complication rate of 3.4% after LRYGB was similar to those of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and hysterectomy. The mortality rate for LRYGB (0.3%) was similar to that of knee arthroplasty. Patients who underwent LRYGB had significantly better short-term outcomes in all examined variables than patients who underwent coronary bypass, infra-inguinal revascularization and laparoscopic colectomy. In conclusion, LRYGB can be considered a safe procedure in people with diabetes, with similar short-term morbidity to that of common procedures such as cholecystectomy and appendectomy and a mortality rate similar to that of knee arthroplasty. The mortality risk for LRYGB is one-tenth that of cardiovascular surgery and earlier intervention with metabolic surgery to treat diabetes may eliminate the need for some later higher-risk procedures to treat diabetes complications.

摘要

虽然最近的研究表明腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(LRYGB)具有令人印象深刻的抗糖尿病作用,但代谢/糖尿病手术的安全性一直是患者和医生关注的问题。从美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库中检索了 2007 年 1 月至 2012 年 12 月期间接受 LRYGB 或其他七种手术之一的 2 型糖尿病患者的数据,并进行了比较。在纳入的 66678 例患者中,有 16509 例接受了 LRYGB。LRYGB 的复合并发症发生率为 3.4%,与腹腔镜胆囊切除术和子宫切除术相似。LRYGB 的死亡率(0.3%)与膝关节置换术相似。与接受冠状动脉旁路、下肢血管再通和腹腔镜结肠切除术的患者相比,接受 LRYGB 的患者在所有检查变量的短期结果均显著更好。总之,LRYGB 可被视为糖尿病患者的一种安全手术,其短期发病率与胆囊切除术和阑尾切除术等常见手术相似,死亡率与膝关节置换术相似。LRYGB 的死亡率是心血管手术的十分之一,早期进行代谢手术治疗糖尿病可能会消除一些后期高风险手术治疗糖尿病并发症的需要。

相似文献

1
How safe is metabolic/diabetes surgery?代谢/糖尿病手术有多安全?
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Feb;17(2):198-201. doi: 10.1111/dom.12405. Epub 2014 Nov 19.
2
Procedure-related morbidity in bariatric surgery: a retrospective short- and mid-term follow-up of a single institution of the American College of Surgeons Bariatric Surgery Centers of Excellence.减重手术相关发病率:美国外科医师学会减重手术卓越中心单机构的回顾性短期和中期随访。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Oct;217(4):614-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.05.013. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
3
Two-step conversion surgery after failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Comparison between laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic gastric sleeve.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术失败后的两步转换手术。腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与腹腔镜胃袖状切除术的比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1085-91. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.03.017. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
4
Bands and bypasses: 30-day morbidity and mortality of bariatric surgical procedures as assessed by prospective, multi-center, risk-adjusted ACS-NSQIP data.捆绑术与旁路手术:根据前瞻性、多中心、风险调整后的美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS-NSQIP)数据评估的减肥手术的30天发病率和死亡率
Surg Endosc. 2008 Dec;22(12):2554-63. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0074-y. Epub 2008 Sep 20.
5
Comparative study between laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass: single-institution, 5-year experience in bariatric surgery.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术与腹腔镜胃旁路术的比较研究:单机构5年肥胖症手术经验
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Jan-Feb;3(1):42-50; discussion 50-1. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.11.005.
6
Conversion of failed laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding: sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass?腹腔镜可调胃束带术失败后的转换:胃袖状切除术还是 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术?
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013 Nov-Dec;9(6):901-7. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
7
Comparison of cholecystectomy cases after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and gastric banding.比较 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术、袖状胃切除术和胃束带术治疗胆囊切除术后的病例。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Jan-Feb;10(1):64-8. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2013.04.019. Epub 2013 Jun 4.
8
[Surgery for morbid obesity: 2. Complications. Results of a Technologic Evaluation by the ANAES].[病态肥胖症手术:2. 并发症。ANAES 技术评估结果]
J Chir (Paris). 2003 Feb;140(1):4-21.
9
Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 5-year results of a prospective randomized trial.腹腔镜可调节胃束带术与Roux-en-Y胃旁路术:一项前瞻性随机试验的5年结果
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2007 Mar-Apr;3(2):127-32; discussion 132-3. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2006.12.005. Epub 2007 Feb 27.
10
Short-term morbidity associated with removal and revision of the laparoscopic adjustable gastric band.与腹腔镜可调节胃束带移除及翻修相关的短期发病率
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014 Nov-Dec;10(6):1110-5. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive Factors for Pulmonary Embolism in Patients Undergoing Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: Insights from the Latest MBSAQIP Data.代谢和减重手术患者发生肺栓塞的预测因素:来自最新MBSAQIP数据的见解
Obes Surg. 2025 Sep 1. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08190-z.
2
Patient and operative characteristics of readmission and poly-readmission following metabolic surgery: an MBSAQIP analysis (2015-2021).代谢手术后再入院和多次再入院的患者及手术特征:一项MBSAQIP分析(2015 - 2021年)
Surg Endosc. 2025 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11799-x.
3
Identifying At-Risk Populations for Reoperations, Readmissions, and Interventions in MBSAQIP Using a Novel Inpatient Postoperative Care Metric.
使用一种新型住院术后护理指标识别MBSAQIP中再次手术、再入院和干预的高危人群。
Obes Surg. 2025 Mar;35(3):915-925. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07686-y. Epub 2025 Jan 30.
4
8. Obesity and Weight Management for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.8. 肥胖与体重管理在2型糖尿病预防和治疗中的应用:2025年糖尿病照护标准
Diabetes Care. 2025 Jan 1;48(Supplement_1):S167-S180. doi: 10.2337/dc25-S008.
5
Risk factors for bariatric surgery in patients over 65 years of age-a multicenter retrospective cohort study.65 岁以上患者行减重手术的风险因素:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Apr 9;409(1):115. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03304-0.
6
Metabolic-Bariatric Surgery for Type 2 Diabetes: Time(ing) for a Change.代谢性减重手术治疗2型糖尿病:是时候做出改变了。
Diabetes. 2024 Apr 1;73(4):542-544. doi: 10.2337/dbi23-0022.
7
Indications and Coverage of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery: A Worldwide IFSO Survey Comparing Different National Guidelines.代谢和减重手术的适应证和覆盖范围:一项 IFSO 全球调查,比较不同国家的指南。
Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1395-1404. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07142-3. Epub 2024 Mar 13.
8
8. Obesity and Weight Management for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024.8. 肥胖与体重管理在2型糖尿病预防和治疗中的应用:2024年糖尿病照护标准
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(Suppl 1):S145-S157. doi: 10.2337/dc24-S008.
9
Rate of Cardiovascular Events and Safety Outcomes Seven Years Following Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy.胃旁路手术与袖状胃切除术七年后的心血管事件发生率及安全性结果
Ann Surg Open. 2023 May 31;4(2):e286. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000286. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban for Postoperative Thromboprophylaxis in Patients After Bariatric Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.利伐沙班用于减肥手术后患者术后血栓预防的疗效和安全性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315241. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15241.