Suppr超能文献

使用双能X线吸收法和多频生物电阻抗法对大学女运动员的全身和分段身体成分进行比较。

Comparison of total and segmental body composition using DXA and multifrequency bioimpedance in collegiate female athletes.

作者信息

Esco Michael R, Snarr Ronald L, Leatherwood Matthew D, Chamberlain Nik A, Redding Melvenia L, Flatt Andrew A, Moon Jordan R, Williford Henry N

机构信息

1Department of Kinesiology, Human Performance Laboratory, Auburn University at Montgomery, Montgomery, Alabama; 2Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama; and 3MusclePharm Sports Science Institute, Muscle Pharm Corp., Denver, Colorado.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Apr;29(4):918-25. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000732.

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation was to determine the agreement between multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for measuring body fat percentage (BF%), fat-free mass (FFM), and total body and segmental lean soft tissue (LST) in collegiate female athletes. Forty-five female athletes (age = 21.2 ± 2.0 years, height = 166.1 ± 7.1 cm, weight = 62.6 ± 9.9 kg) participated in this study. Variables measured through BIA and DXA were as follows: BF%, FFM, and LST of the arms (ARMS(LST)), the legs (LEGS(LST)), the trunk (TRUNK(LST)), and the total body (TOTAL(LST)). Compared with the DXA, the InBody 720 provided significantly lower values for BF% (-3.3%, p < 0.001) and significantly higher values for FFM (2.1 kg, p < 0.001) with limits of agreement (1.96 SD of the mean difference) of ±5.6% for BF% and ±3.7 kg for FFM. No significant differences (p < 0.008) existed between the 2 devices (InBody 720-DXA) for ARMS(LST) (0.05 kg), TRUNK(LST) (0.14 kg), LEGS(LST) (-0.4 kg), and TOTAL(LST) (-0.21 kg). The limits of agreement were ±0.79 kg for ARMS(LST), ±2.62 kg for LEGS(LST), ±3.18 kg for TRUNK(LST), and ±4.23 kg for TOTAL(LST). This study found discrepancies in BF% and FFM between the 2 devices. However, the InBody 720 and DXA appeared to provide excellent agreement for measuring total body and segmental LST. Therefore, the InBody 720 may be a rapid noninvasive method to assess LST in female athletes when DXA is not available.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定多频生物电阻抗分析(BIA)和双能X线吸收法(DXA)在测量大学女运动员体脂百分比(BF%)、去脂体重(FFM)以及全身和各节段瘦软组织(LST)方面的一致性。45名女运动员(年龄=21.2±2.0岁,身高=166.1±7.1厘米,体重=62.6±9.9千克)参与了本研究。通过BIA和DXA测量的变量如下:手臂(ARMS(LST))、腿部(LEGS(LST))、躯干(TRUNK(LST))和全身(TOTAL(LST))的BF%、FFM和LST。与DXA相比,InBody 720测得的BF%值显著更低(-3.3%,p<0.001),FFM值显著更高(2.1千克,p<0.001),BF%的一致性界限(平均差异的1.96倍标准差)为±5.6%,FFM为±3.7千克。两种设备(InBody 720-DXA)在ARMS(LST)(0.05千克)、TRUNK(LST)(0.14千克)、LEGS(LST)(-0.4千克)和TOTAL(LST)(-0.21千克)方面不存在显著差异(p<0.008)。ARMS(LST)的一致性界限为±0.79千克,LEGS(LST)为±2.62千克,TRUNK(LST)为±3.18千克,TOTAL(LST)为±4.23千克。本研究发现两种设备在BF%和FFM方面存在差异。然而,InBody 720和DXA在测量全身和各节段LST方面似乎具有良好的一致性。因此,当无法使用DXA时,InBody 720可能是评估女运动员LST的一种快速无创方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验