Esco Michael R, Snarr Ronald L, Leatherwood Matthew D, Chamberlain Nik A, Redding Melvenia L, Flatt Andrew A, Moon Jordan R, Williford Henry N
1Department of Kinesiology, Human Performance Laboratory, Auburn University at Montgomery, Montgomery, Alabama; 2Department of Kinesiology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama; and 3MusclePharm Sports Science Institute, Muscle Pharm Corp., Denver, Colorado.
J Strength Cond Res. 2015 Apr;29(4):918-25. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000732.
The purpose of this investigation was to determine the agreement between multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for measuring body fat percentage (BF%), fat-free mass (FFM), and total body and segmental lean soft tissue (LST) in collegiate female athletes. Forty-five female athletes (age = 21.2 ± 2.0 years, height = 166.1 ± 7.1 cm, weight = 62.6 ± 9.9 kg) participated in this study. Variables measured through BIA and DXA were as follows: BF%, FFM, and LST of the arms (ARMS(LST)), the legs (LEGS(LST)), the trunk (TRUNK(LST)), and the total body (TOTAL(LST)). Compared with the DXA, the InBody 720 provided significantly lower values for BF% (-3.3%, p < 0.001) and significantly higher values for FFM (2.1 kg, p < 0.001) with limits of agreement (1.96 SD of the mean difference) of ±5.6% for BF% and ±3.7 kg for FFM. No significant differences (p < 0.008) existed between the 2 devices (InBody 720-DXA) for ARMS(LST) (0.05 kg), TRUNK(LST) (0.14 kg), LEGS(LST) (-0.4 kg), and TOTAL(LST) (-0.21 kg). The limits of agreement were ±0.79 kg for ARMS(LST), ±2.62 kg for LEGS(LST), ±3.18 kg for TRUNK(LST), and ±4.23 kg for TOTAL(LST). This study found discrepancies in BF% and FFM between the 2 devices. However, the InBody 720 and DXA appeared to provide excellent agreement for measuring total body and segmental LST. Therefore, the InBody 720 may be a rapid noninvasive method to assess LST in female athletes when DXA is not available.
本研究的目的是确定多频生物电阻抗分析(BIA)和双能X线吸收法(DXA)在测量大学女运动员体脂百分比(BF%)、去脂体重(FFM)以及全身和各节段瘦软组织(LST)方面的一致性。45名女运动员(年龄=21.2±2.0岁,身高=166.1±7.1厘米,体重=62.6±9.9千克)参与了本研究。通过BIA和DXA测量的变量如下:手臂(ARMS(LST))、腿部(LEGS(LST))、躯干(TRUNK(LST))和全身(TOTAL(LST))的BF%、FFM和LST。与DXA相比,InBody 720测得的BF%值显著更低(-3.3%,p<0.001),FFM值显著更高(2.1千克,p<0.001),BF%的一致性界限(平均差异的1.96倍标准差)为±5.6%,FFM为±3.7千克。两种设备(InBody 720-DXA)在ARMS(LST)(0.05千克)、TRUNK(LST)(0.14千克)、LEGS(LST)(-0.4千克)和TOTAL(LST)(-0.21千克)方面不存在显著差异(p<0.008)。ARMS(LST)的一致性界限为±0.79千克,LEGS(LST)为±2.62千克,TRUNK(LST)为±3.18千克,TOTAL(LST)为±4.23千克。本研究发现两种设备在BF%和FFM方面存在差异。然而,InBody 720和DXA在测量全身和各节段LST方面似乎具有良好的一致性。因此,当无法使用DXA时,InBody 720可能是评估女运动员LST的一种快速无创方法。