• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
How Specialized Are Special Needs Plans? Evidence From Provider Networks.特殊需求计划有多专业?来自医疗服务提供网络的证据。
Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Feb;82(1):58-67. doi: 10.1177/10775587241296194. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
2
Outcomes for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries With Dementia in Special Needs Plans and Other Medicare Advantage Plans.特殊需求计划和其他医疗保险优势计划中患有痴呆症的双重资格受益人的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2461219. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61219.
3
Patient-Reported Characteristics Across Dual-Eligible Medicare Advantage Plan Types.双重资格医疗保险优势计划类型的患者报告特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255791. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5791.
4
Psychiatrist and Nonpsychiatrist Physician Network Breadth in Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans.精神科医生和非精神科医生在双重合格特殊需求计划中的网络广度。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Aug 1;74(8):816-822. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220239. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
5
Differences in healthcare utilization between enrollees of fully integrated dual eligible special needs plans versus non-fully integrated plans.完全整合的双重资格特殊需要计划参保人与非完全整合计划参保人之间的医疗利用差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):2027-2037. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18916. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
6
Medicaid Spending in Coordination-Only Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans.仅协调的双重资格特殊需求计划中的医疗补助支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455461. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55461.
7
County-Level Enrollment in Medicare Advantage Plans Offering Expanded Supplemental Benefits.县级医疗保险优势计划的参保情况,这些计划提供了扩展的补充福利。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2433972. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.33972.
8
Analysis of Drivers of Disenrollment and Plan Switching Among Medicare Advantage Beneficiaries.医疗保险优势计划参保人退保和计划转换的驱动因素分析。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr 1;179(4):524-532. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7639.
9
Special Needs Plans and the coordination of benefits and services for dual eligibles.特殊需求计划以及双重资格者的福利与服务协调。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):136-46. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.136.
10
Nationwide Availability of and Enrollment in Medicare and Medicaid Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans With Exclusively Aligned Enrollment.医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格特别需要计划的全国可用性和注册,其注册完全一致。
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Oct 4;5(10):e243546. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3546.

本文引用的文献

1
Commercial Insurer Market Power and Medicaid Managed Care Networks.商业保险公司市场势力与医疗补助管理式医疗网络。
Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Aug;81(4):327-334. doi: 10.1177/10775587241241975. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
Contraceptive Use Among Traditional Medicare And Medicare Advantage Enrollees.传统医疗保险和医疗保险优势计划参保者的避孕措施使用情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jan;43(1):98-107. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00286.
3
Medicare and Medicaid Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plan Enrollment and Beneficiary-Reported Experiences With Care.医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格特殊需求计划的参保情况及受益人报告的就医体验。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Sep 1;4(9):e232957. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.2957.
4
Psychiatrist Networks In Medicare Advantage Plans Are Substantially Narrower Than In Medicaid And ACA Markets.在医疗保险优势计划中,精神科医生网络的范围明显小于医疗补助和 ACA 市场。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Jul;42(7):909-918. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01547.
5
State Policy and the Breadth of Buprenorphine-Prescriber Networks in Medicaid Managed Care.州政策与医疗补助管理式医疗中丁丙诺啡处方医生网络的广度。
Med Care Res Rev. 2023 Aug;80(4):423-432. doi: 10.1177/10775587231167514. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
6
Psychiatrist and Nonpsychiatrist Physician Network Breadth in Dual Eligible Special Needs Plans.精神科医生和非精神科医生在双重合格特殊需求计划中的网络广度。
Psychiatr Serv. 2023 Aug 1;74(8):816-822. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220239. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
7
Differences In Care Between Special Needs Plans And Other Medicare Coverage For Dual Eligibles.特殊需求计划与其他医疗保险覆盖的双重资格人群之间的护理差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Sep;41(9):1238-1247. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00463.
8
Comparison of Ambulatory Care Access and Quality for Beneficiaries With Disabilities Covered by Medicare Advantage vs Traditional Medicare Insurance.比较 Medicare Advantage 覆盖的残疾受益人与传统 Medicare 保险的门诊护理可及性和质量。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Jan 14;3(1):e214562. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4562. eCollection 2022 Jan.
9
Physician Network Breadth and Plan Quality Ratings in Medicare Advantage.医疗保险优势计划中的医师网络广度和计划质量评分。
JAMA Health Forum. 2021 Jul 30;2(7):e211816. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.1816. eCollection 2021 Jul.
10
Phantom Networks: Discrepancies Between Reported And Realized Mental Health Care Access In Oregon Medicaid.幽灵网络:俄勒冈州医疗补助计划中报告的和实际获得的心理健康护理之间的差距。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jul;41(7):1013-1022. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.00052.

特殊需求计划有多专业?来自医疗服务提供网络的证据。

How Specialized Are Special Needs Plans? Evidence From Provider Networks.

作者信息

McCormack Grace, Wu Rachel, Meiselbach Mark

机构信息

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2025 Feb;82(1):58-67. doi: 10.1177/10775587241296194. Epub 2024 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1177/10775587241296194
PMID:39560115
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12043026/
Abstract

Enrollment in Medicare Advantage (MA) Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans (D-SNPs) among individuals dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid has more than tripled over the past decade. Little is known about whether D-SNP plan design differs from standard MA plan design nor whether this design reflects the needs of dual-eligible enrollees. We characterize the degree to which D-SNPs specialize in an important plan design dimension-provider networks. We find that in 2022, 46% of D-SNPs offer networks that are distinct from the insurer's standard MA plan networks. Compared with D-SNP networks that are shared with standard MA plans, specialized D-SNP networks include more psychiatrists, Ob/Gyn's, and neurologists, providers that specialize in treating conditions more common among dually eligible enrollees. Network specialization is more common among insurers participating in the local Medicaid market and less common in provider shortage areas, suggesting investment in Medicaid and reduced provider negotiation costs may facilitate specialization.

摘要

在过去十年中,符合医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格的个人加入医疗保险优势(MA)双重资格特殊需求计划(D-SNP)的人数增长了两倍多。对于D-SNP计划设计是否与标准MA计划设计不同,以及这种设计是否反映了双重资格参保人的需求,我们知之甚少。我们描述了D-SNP在一个重要的计划设计维度——提供者网络方面的专业化程度。我们发现,2022年,46%的D-SNP提供的网络与保险公司的标准MA计划网络不同。与与标准MA计划共享的D-SNP网络相比,专门的D-SNP网络包括更多的精神科医生、妇产科医生和神经科医生,这些提供者专门治疗双重资格参保人中更常见的疾病。网络专业化在参与当地医疗补助市场的保险公司中更为普遍,而在提供者短缺地区则不太常见,这表明对医疗补助的投资和降低的提供者谈判成本可能有助于专业化。