Psychology, School of Applied Human Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Int J Psychol. 2014 Dec;49(6):498-502. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12059. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
Patterns of collaboration in social psychology from 2000 to 2010 were mapped to analyse the position of African authors in the international co-authorship network using bibliographic records from the Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge. There are very few social psychologists working in Africa, with the majority of these located in South Africa. Indeed, some small European countries boast more social psychologists than the entire continent of Africa. African authors published less than their non-African collaborators, but had comparable status on joint publications. Co-authorship relationships between African researchers from different African countries were generally mediated by partners from other continents, and direct collaboration between non-compatriot African authors was very rare. The small size, and extremely sparse connection of the African co-authorship network, is likely to be an obstacle both in the development of social psychology as a universally relevant discipline and in the penetration of social psychological knowledge in Africa.
对 2000 年至 2010 年社会心理学领域的合作模式进行了分析,以利用汤森路透 Web of Knowledge 的书目记录,分析非洲作者在国际合著网络中的地位。非洲从事社会心理学研究的人员非常少,其中大多数都在南非。事实上,一些欧洲小国的社会心理学家数量超过了整个非洲大陆。非洲作者的发文量少于非非洲合著者,但在合著论文方面地位相当。来自不同非洲国家的非洲研究人员之间的合作关系通常由来自其他大陆的合作伙伴介导,非同胞非洲作者之间的直接合作非常罕见。非洲合著网络的规模较小,连接极为稀疏,这可能既是社会心理学作为一门普遍相关学科发展的障碍,也是社会心理学知识在非洲传播的障碍。