Huang ZeYu, Liu Lei, Tu ChongQi, Zhang Hui, Fang Yue, Yang TianFu, Pei FuXing
Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 37# Guoxue Road, Chengdu 610041, People's Republic of China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Oct 30;15:360. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-360.
This study was to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes with three different implants and evaluate the effectiveness of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique for the distal fibular fractures.
We performed a retrospective cohort single-surgical team single-facility study between 2000 and 2011. 147 patients receiving surgical interventions for closed, displaced distal fibular fractures were included. Based on the different implants, patients were divided into three groups: Group A: one-third tubular plate; Group B: locking compression (LCP) metaphyseal plate; Group C: LCP distal fibula plate. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared among the three groups.
Totally, we found that patients in Group C had significant higher functional scores than those in Group A (p1 = 0.004; p2 = 0.002) (p1 stands for the p value for Olerud & Molandar Score, p2 stands for the p value for American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society score). The healing time was significant less in Group C than that in Group A (p < 0.0001) and Group B (p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis showed that: (1) For Weber A fracture, the functional scores of the Group C were higher than those in Group A (p1 = 0.020; p2 = 0.029) and B (p1 = 0.020; p2 = 0.034). (2) For Weber B fracture, the functional scores of the Group B (p1 = 0.033; p2 = 0.030) and C (p1 = 0.027; p2 = 0.017) were higher than those in Group A. No significant differences were observed in terms of the ankle range of motion, reduction accuracy and complication rate.
Our study demonstrated using LCP metaphyseal plate in patients associated with lateral malleolar fracture could achieve significantly better OMS & AOFAS scores and less healing time than using one-third tubular plate. Specifically, For Weber A fracture, LCP distal fibula plate is much better than one-third tubular plate and LCP metaphyseal plate. While for Weber B fracture, LCP distal fibula plate and LCP metaphyseal plate are better than one-third tubular plate. As to the complications, using MIPO technique in patients with distal fibular fractures is at least comparable to the traditional one.
本研究旨在比较三种不同植入物的临床和影像学结果,并评估微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)技术治疗腓骨远端骨折的有效性。
我们在2000年至2011年间进行了一项回顾性队列单手术团队单机构研究。纳入147例接受闭合性、移位性腓骨远端骨折手术干预的患者。根据不同的植入物,患者被分为三组:A组:三分之一管状钢板;B组:锁定加压(LCP)干骺端钢板;C组:LCP腓骨远端钢板。比较三组的临床和影像学结果。
总体而言,我们发现C组患者的功能评分显著高于A组(p1 = 0.004;p2 = 0.002)(p1代表Olerud & Molandar评分的p值,p2代表美国矫形足踝协会评分的p值)。C组的愈合时间显著短于A组(p < 0.0001)和B组(p < 0.0001)。亚组分析显示:(1)对于Weber A型骨折,C组的功能评分高于A组(p1 = 0.