Suppr超能文献

血管紧张素转换酶插入/缺失多态性并非散发性阿尔茨海默病发生的主要决定因素:一项更新的荟萃分析证据

Angiotensin-converting enzyme insertion/deletion polymorphism is not a major determining factor in the development of sporadic Alzheimer disease: evidence from an updated meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Xue-bin, Cui Ning-hua, Yang Jie, Qiu Xue-ping, Gao Jia-jia, Yang Na, Zheng Fang

机构信息

Center for Gene Diagnosis, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Department of Clinical Laboratory, Children's Hospital of Zhengzhou, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Oct 31;9(10):e111406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111406. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene (ACE) insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism have long been linked to sporadic Alzheimer disease (SAD), but the established data remained controversial. To clarify this inconsistency, a comprehensive meta-analysis was conducted. Through searching of Pubmed, Embase, Alzgene, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and manually searching relevant references, 53 independent studies from 48 articles were included, involving a total of 8153 cases and 14932 controls. The strength of association was assessed by using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Further stratified analyses and heterogeneity analyses were tested, as was publication bias. Overall, significant associations were revealed between I/D polymorphism and SAD risk using allelic comparison (OR = 1.09, 95%CI = 1.01-1.17, p = 0.030), homozygote comparison (OR = 1.17, 95%CI = 1.01-1.34, p = 0.030) and the dominant model (OR = 1.16, 95%CI = 1.04-1.29, p = 0.008), but they were not sufficiently robust to withstand the false-positive report probability (FPRP) analyses. Otherwise, in subgroup analyses restricted to the high quality studies, the large sample size studies and studies with population-based controls, no significant association was observed in any genetic models. In summary, the current meta-analysis suggested that the ACE I/D polymorphism is unlikely to be a major determining factor in the development of SAD.

摘要

血管紧张素转换酶基因(ACE)插入/缺失(I/D)多态性长期以来一直与散发性阿尔茨海默病(SAD)相关,但现有数据仍存在争议。为了澄清这种不一致性,我们进行了一项全面的荟萃分析。通过检索PubMed、Embase、Alzgene、中国知网(CNKI)并手动检索相关参考文献,纳入了48篇文章中的53项独立研究,共涉及8153例病例和14932例对照。采用比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)评估关联强度。进一步进行了分层分析和异质性分析,并检测了发表偏倚。总体而言,在等位基因比较(OR = 1.09,95%CI = 1.01 - 1.17,p = 0.030)、纯合子比较(OR = 1.17,95%CI = 1.01 - 1.34,p = 0.030)和显性模型(OR = 1.16,95%CI = 1.04 - 1.29,p = 0.008)中,I/D多态性与SAD风险之间存在显著关联,但这些关联强度不足以抵御假阳性报告概率(FPRP)分析。此外,在限于高质量研究、大样本量研究和基于人群对照的研究的亚组分析中,在任何遗传模型中均未观察到显著关联。总之,当前的荟萃分析表明,ACE I/D多态性不太可能是SAD发病的主要决定因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a3f/4216072/e87436ee266d/pone.0111406.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验