Suppr超能文献

关注工作记忆中的项目:刷新与记忆搜索密切相关的证据。

Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related.

作者信息

Vergauwe Evie, Cowan Nelson

机构信息

Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, 211 McAlester Hall, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA,

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):1001-6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0755-6.

Abstract

Refreshing refers to the use of attention to reactivate items in working memory (WM). In the present study, we aimed to test the hypothesis that refreshing is closely related to memory search. The assumption is that refreshing and memory search both rely on a basic covert memory process that quickly retrieves the memory items into the focus of attention, thereby reactivating the information (Cowan, 1992; Vergauwe & Cowan, 2014). Consistent with the idea that people use their attention to prevent loss from WM, previous research has shown that increasing the proportion of time during which attention is occupied by concurrent processing, thereby preventing refreshing, results in poorer recall performance in complex span tasks (Barrouillet, Portrat, & Camos, Psychological Review, 118, 175-192, 2011). Here, we tested whether recall performance is differentially affected by prolonged attentional capture caused by memory search. If memory search and refreshing both rely on retrieval from WM, then prolonged attentional capture caused by memory search should not lead to forgetting, because memory items are assumed to be reactivated during memory search, in the same way that they would be if that period of time were used for refreshing. Consistent with this idea, prolonged attentional capture had a disruptive effect when it was caused by the need to retrieve knowledge from long-term memory, but not when it was caused by the need to search through the content of WM. The present results support the idea that refreshing operates through a process of retrieval of information into the focus of attention.

摘要

刷新是指利用注意力重新激活工作记忆(WM)中的项目。在本研究中,我们旨在检验刷新与记忆搜索密切相关这一假设。假设是刷新和记忆搜索都依赖于一个基本的隐蔽记忆过程,该过程能迅速将记忆项目检索到注意力焦点中,从而重新激活信息(考恩,1992;韦尔高韦和考恩,2014)。与人们利用注意力防止工作记忆中的信息丢失这一观点一致,先前的研究表明,增加注意力被并发处理占用的时间比例,从而阻止刷新,会导致在复杂广度任务中的回忆表现更差(巴鲁伊莱、波拉特和卡莫斯,《心理评论》,118,175 - 192,2011)。在此,我们测试了记忆搜索导致的注意力长时间被吸引是否会对回忆表现产生不同影响。如果记忆搜索和刷新都依赖于从工作记忆中检索信息,那么记忆搜索导致的注意力长时间被吸引不应导致遗忘,因为假设记忆项目在记忆搜索过程中会被重新激活,就如同那段时间用于刷新时它们会被重新激活一样。与这一观点一致,当注意力长时间被吸引是由从长期记忆中检索知识的需求导致时,会产生干扰作用,但当它是由搜索工作记忆内容的需求导致时则不会。目前的结果支持了刷新是通过将信息检索到注意力焦点的过程来运作的这一观点。

相似文献

1
Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):1001-6. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0755-6.
2
An examination of refreshing in between-category sequences.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jul;1424(1):190-201. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13702. Epub 2018 May 9.
3
Does semantic long-term memory impact refreshing in verbal working memory?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Sep;45(9):1664-1682. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000657. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
4
Attentional refreshing moderates the word frequency effect in immediate and delayed recall tasks.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jul;1424(1):127-136. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13847. Epub 2018 May 14.
5
Long-term semantic representations moderate the effect of attentional refreshing on episodic memory.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Feb;22(1):274-80. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0673-7.
6
Comparing different instructed-refreshing schedules: evidence for cumulative, forward-order refreshing of verbal lists?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jul;1424(1):102-114. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13630. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
7
What makes working memory traces stable over time?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jul;1424(1):149-160. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13668. Epub 2018 May 9.
8
Refreshing memory traces: thinking of an item improves retrieval from visual working memory.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2015 Mar;1339:20-31. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12603. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
9
Where to attend next: guiding refreshing of visual, spatial, and verbal representations in working memory.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jul;1424(1):76-90. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13621. Epub 2018 Apr 23.
10
The impact of cognitive load on delayed recall.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Aug;22(4):1029-34. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0772-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Putting the "Return" Back in the Inhibition of Return Effect in Working Memory.
J Cogn. 2024 Oct 1;7(1):70. doi: 10.5334/joc.401. eCollection 2024.
2
The visual familiarity effect on attentional working memory maintenance.
Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):1882-1899. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01548-1. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
3
The role of the right prefrontal cortex in the retrieval of weak representations.
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 16;12(1):4537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08493-6.
4
Intraoperative mapping of executive function using electrocorticography for patients with low-grade gliomas.
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 May;163(5):1299-1309. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04646-6. Epub 2020 Nov 22.
5
On some of the main criticisms of the modal model: Reappraisal from a TBRS perspective.
Mem Cognit. 2020 Apr;48(3):455-468. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00982-w.
6
What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?
Br J Psychol. 2019 May;110(2):268-287. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12339. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
7
What do people typically do between list items? The nature of attention-based mnemonic activities depends on task context.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 May;45(5):779-794. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000625. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
8
A Computational Model of Working Memory Integrating Time-Based Decay and Interference.
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 3;9:416. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00416. eCollection 2018.
9
Are there multiple ways to direct attention in working memory?
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jul;1424(1):115-126. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13634. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
10
Separability of active semantic and phonological maintenance in verbal working memory.
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 7;13(3):e0193808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193808. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Unloading and reloading working memory: attending to one item frees capacity.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Jun;40(3):1237-56. doi: 10.1037/a0036331. Epub 2014 Apr 14.
2
A common short-term memory retrieval rate may describe many cognitive procedures.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Mar 7;8:126. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00126. eCollection 2014.
3
The impact of storage on processing: how is information maintained in working memory?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jul;40(4):1072-1095. doi: 10.1037/a0035779. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
5
On the law relating processing to storage in working memory.
Psychol Rev. 2011 Apr;118(2):175-92. doi: 10.1037/a0022324.
7
Do mental processes share a domain-general resource?
Psychol Sci. 2010 Mar;21(3):384-90. doi: 10.1177/0956797610361340. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
8
The Role of Covert Retrieval in Working Memory Span Tasks: Evidence from Delayed Recall Tests.
J Mem Lang. 2008 Feb;58(2):480-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.004.
9
Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: a time-based resource-sharing account.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Jul;35(4):1012-28. doi: 10.1037/a0015859.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验