Lemaire Benoît, Portrat Sophie
CNRS, LPNC UMR 5105, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 3;9:416. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00416. eCollection 2018.
There is still a strong debate in the working memory literature about the cause of forgetting, with many articles providing evidence for the existence of temporal decay and as many publications providing evidence compatible with interference being the only mechanism involved in forgetting. In order to reconcile the two views, this article describes TBRS-I (for Time-Based Resource-Sharing-Interference), a computational model of working memory which incorporates an interference-based mechanism to the decay-based implementation TBRS within the TBRS theoretical framework. At encoding, memoranda are associated to their context, namely their position in the list. Temporal decay decreases the strength of these associations, but a refreshing process may reactivate it during free time. Distractors may alter the distributed representation of memoranda but refreshing can restore them based on the long-term memory representations. Refreshing is therefore twofold: reactivation plus restoration, each one counteracting the detrimental time-based and interference-based decays, respectively. Two types of interference are implemented: interference by confusion which depends on the degree of overlap between memoranda and distractors and interference by superposition which depends on the similarity between them. TBRS-I was tested on six benchmark findings on retention-interval and distractor-processing effects by means of millions of simulations testing the effects of seven factors on memory performance: the number of memoranda, the duration of distractor attentional capture, the duration of free time, the number of distractors, the amount of overlap between memoranda and distractors, the similarity between memoranda and distractors and the homogeneity of distractors (all identical or all distinct). TBRS-I replicated classical effects and proved to be a suitable hybrid model integrating both interference and time-based decay. The article also discusses the compatibility of TBRS-I with a unitary or dual view of memory and the issue of integrating time and interference in a single model. Computer codes and data are available at https://osf.io/65sna/.
在工作记忆文献中,关于遗忘的原因仍存在激烈的争论,许多文章提供了时间衰减存在的证据,同样也有许多出版物提供了与干扰是遗忘唯一涉及机制相符的证据。为了调和这两种观点,本文描述了TBRS-I(基于时间的资源共享干扰模型),这是一种工作记忆的计算模型,它在TBRS理论框架内将基于干扰的机制纳入到基于衰减的TBRS实现中。在编码时,记忆内容与其上下文相关联,即它们在列表中的位置。时间衰减会降低这些关联的强度,但在空闲时间,刷新过程可能会重新激活它。干扰项可能会改变记忆内容的分布式表征,但刷新可以基于长期记忆表征来恢复它们。因此,刷新具有双重作用:重新激活加上恢复,每一个分别抵消基于时间和基于干扰的有害衰减。实现了两种类型的干扰:混淆干扰,它取决于记忆内容与干扰项之间的重叠程度;叠加干扰,它取决于它们之间的相似性。通过数百万次模拟测试七个因素对记忆表现的影响,TBRS-I在关于保持间隔和干扰项处理效应的六个基准研究结果上进行了测试:记忆内容的数量、干扰项注意力捕获的持续时间、空闲时间的持续时间、干扰项的数量、记忆内容与干扰项之间的重叠量、记忆内容与干扰项之间的相似性以及干扰项的同质性(全部相同或全部不同)。TBRS-I复制了经典效应,并被证明是一个整合干扰和基于时间衰减的合适混合模型。本文还讨论了TBRS-I与记忆的单一或双重观点的兼容性,以及在单个模型中整合时间和干扰的问题。计算机代码和数据可在https://osf.io/65sna/获取。