Weaver Andrew J, Kobach Matthew J
Department of Telecommunications, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
Aggress Behav. 2012 Mar-Apr;38(2):175-84. doi: 10.1002/ab.21417.
The existing research on the appeal of media violence has led to an apparent incongruity: violent content tends to increase selective exposure to media, but violence often decreases enjoyment. In this experiment, we used two independent manipulations to assess the role of violence in both selective exposure and enjoyment in order to examine the relationship between the two. Program descriptions for four prime-time television dramas were altered to create violent and nonviolent descriptions for each episode. Then the episodes themselves were edited to create violent and nonviolent versions of each. Participants (N = 191) were more likely to choose violent descriptions to watch, but enjoyed the nonviolent episodes more than the violent episodes. Moreover, the nonviolent episodes were rated as more enjoyable even when the participants had chosen to watch a violent program description. From a theoretical perspective, these results suggest the need to move beyond explaining the appeal of violence in terms of increased enjoyment and instead further explore other motivations that could be driving selective exposure to violent content.
暴力内容往往会增加对媒体的选择性接触,但暴力元素通常会降低观看的愉悦感。在本实验中,我们采用了两种独立的操作方法来评估暴力在选择性接触和愉悦感两方面所起的作用,以此来检验二者之间的关系。我们对四部黄金时段电视剧的节目描述进行了修改,为每一集都创作了暴力和非暴力两种描述版本。然后,对剧集本身进行剪辑,制作出每一集的暴力版和非暴力版。参与者(N = 191)更倾向于选择暴力描述的剧集来观看,但比起暴力剧集,他们更喜欢非暴力剧集。此外,即便参与者选择观看的是暴力节目描述的剧集,非暴力剧集仍被评为更具观赏性。从理论角度来看,这些结果表明,有必要超越单纯从增加愉悦感的角度来解释暴力内容的吸引力,而是进一步探索可能促使人们选择性接触暴力内容的其他动机。