Ortego Alexandra, Gaieski David F, Fuchs Barry D, Jones Tiffanie, Halpern Scott D, Small Dylan S, Sante S Cham, Drumheller Byron, Christie Jason D, Mikkelsen Mark E
1Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 3Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Division, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 4Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 5Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 6The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. 7The Commonwealth Medical College, Scranton, PA.
Crit Care Med. 2015 Apr;43(4):729-37. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000693.
Septic shock is associated with increased long-term morbidity and mortality. However, little is known about the use of hospital-based acute care in survivors after hospital discharge. The objectives of the study were to examine the frequency, timing, causes, and risk factors associated with emergency department visits and hospital readmissions within 30 days of discharge.
Retrospective cohort study.
Tertiary, academic hospital in the United States.
Patients admitted with septic shock (serum lactate≥4 mmol/L or refractory hypotension) and discharged alive to a nonhospice setting between 2007 and 2010.
None.
The coprimary outcomes were all-cause hospital readmission and emergency department visits (treat-and-release encounters) within 30 days to any of the three health system hospitals. Of 269 at-risk survivors, 63 (23.4%; 95% CI, 18.2-28.5) were readmitted within 30 days of discharge and another 12 (4.5%; 95% CI, 2.3-7.7) returned to the emergency department for a treat-and-release visit. Readmissions occurred within 15 days of discharge in 75% of cases and were more likely in oncology patients (p=0.001) and patients with a longer hospital length of stay (p=0.04). Readmissions were frequently due to another life-threatening condition and resulted in death or discharge to hospice in 16% of cases. The reasons for readmission were deemed potentially related to the index septic shock hospitalization in 78% (49 of 63) of cases. The most common cause was infection related, accounting for 46% of all 30-day readmissions, followed by cardiovascular or thromboembolic events (18%).
The use of hospital-based acute care appeared to be common in septic shock survivors. Encounters often led to readmission within 15 days of discharge, were frequently due to another acute condition, and appeared to result in substantial morbidity and mortality. Given the potential public health implications of these findings, validation studies are needed.
脓毒性休克与长期发病率和死亡率增加相关。然而,对于出院后幸存者使用医院急性护理的情况知之甚少。本研究的目的是调查出院后30天内急诊就诊和再次入院的频率、时间、原因及危险因素。
回顾性队列研究。
美国一家三级学术医院。
2007年至2010年间因脓毒性休克(血清乳酸≥4 mmol/L或难治性低血压)入院且出院后存活并入住非临终关怀机构的患者。
无。
共同主要结局为出院后30天内因任何原因再次入院以及到三家卫生系统医院中的任何一家急诊就诊(治疗后出院)。在269名有风险的幸存者中,63人(23.4%;95%CI,18.2 - 28.5)在出院后30天内再次入院,另有12人(4.5%;95%CI,2.3 - 7.7)返回急诊进行治疗后出院就诊。75%的再次入院发生在出院后15天内,肿瘤患者(p = 0.001)和住院时间较长的患者(p = 0.04)更易再次入院。再次入院常因另一种危及生命的状况,16%的病例导致死亡或出院后入住临终关怀机构。78%(63例中的49例)的再次入院原因被认为可能与首次脓毒性休克住院有关。最常见的原因是感染相关,占所有30天再次入院的46%,其次是心血管或血栓栓塞事件(18%)。
在脓毒性休克幸存者中,使用医院急性护理似乎很常见。就诊常常导致出院后15天内再次入院,常因另一种急性状况,且似乎导致了相当高的发病率和死亡率。鉴于这些发现对公共卫生的潜在影响,需要进行验证研究。