Ghaffarzadegan Navid, Hawley Joshua, Desai Anand
Engineering Systems Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA ; John Glenn School of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
John Glenn School of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Syst Res Behav Sci. 2014 Mar;31(2):301-315. doi: 10.1002/sres.2190.
The US government has been increasingly supporting postdoctoral training in biomedical sciences to develop the domestic research workforce. However, current trends suggest that mostly international researchers benefit from the funding, many of whom might leave the USA after training. In this paper, we describe a model used to analyse the flow of national versus international researchers into and out of postdoctoral training. We calibrate our model in the case of the USA and successfully replicate the data. We use the model to conduct simulation-based analyses of effects of different policies on the diversity of postdoctoral researchers. Our model shows that capping the duration of postdoctoral careers, a policy proposed previously, favours international postdoctoral researchers. The analysis suggests that the leverage point to help the growth of domestic research workforce is in the pregraduate education area, and many policies implemented at the postgraduate level have minimal or unintended effects on diversity.
美国政府一直在加大对生物医学科学博士后培训的支持力度,以培养国内研究人员队伍。然而,当前的趋势表明,受益于这笔资金的大多是国际研究人员,其中许多人可能在培训结束后离开美国。在本文中,我们描述了一个用于分析国内和国际研究人员进出博士后培训流动情况的模型。我们在美国的案例中校准了我们的模型,并成功复制了数据。我们使用该模型对不同政策对博士后研究人员多样性的影响进行基于模拟的分析。我们的模型表明,此前提出的限制博士后职业生涯时长的政策有利于国际博士后研究人员。分析表明,帮助国内研究人员队伍发展的杠杆点在于研究生前教育领域,而在研究生阶段实施的许多政策对多样性的影响微乎其微或产生了意想不到的效果。