Suppr超能文献

全基因组序列同一性与DNA杂交之间的关系在原核生物各属之间有所不同。

The relationship of the whole genome sequence identity to DNA hybridization varies between genera of prokaryotes.

作者信息

Li Xun, Huang Yongjie, Whitman William B

机构信息

Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.

出版信息

Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Jan;107(1):241-9. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0322-1. Epub 2014 Nov 5.

Abstract

In the original proposal of Wayne et al. (Int J Syst Bacteriol 37:463-464, 1987), two measures of genetic relatedness were proposed to set the boundary for prokaryotic species. The first was the change in the melting temperature (ΔTm) of heteroduplex DNA and the second was the extent of DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH). While this approach was justified given the experimental error inherent in these methods, genomic sequencing has the potential to measure both parameters with great precision. The average nucleotide identity (ANIb), a surrogate for the ΔTm, and the calculated DDH (cDDH) were determined from the complete genomes of representatives of 17 genera of prokaryotes. When the ANIb was >75 %, the ratio (100-cDDH)/(100-ANIb) was 3.69 ± 0.93 (± SD) and varied from about 2.35 to 4.59 between genera. The differences among genera was highly significant (p < 0.001) but not correlated with specific phylogenetic or physiological groups. Moreover, the ANIm was a poor measure of ANIb when ANIb was <75 %. Because the ANIb and cDDH provide different measures of relatedness, it is no longer appropiate to consider both when delineating species. For these reasons, measures of relatedness based upon sequence identity should be used for delineating species in the future.

摘要

在韦恩等人最初的提议中(《国际系统细菌学杂志》37:463 - 464, 1987),提出了两种遗传相关性的衡量方法来设定原核生物物种的界限。第一种是异源双链DNA解链温度的变化(ΔTm),第二种是DNA - DNA杂交的程度(DDH)。鉴于这些方法中固有的实验误差,这种方法是合理的,而基因组测序有潜力高精度地测量这两个参数。从17个原核生物属的代表的完整基因组中确定了平均核苷酸同一性(ANIb,作为ΔTm的替代指标)和计算得到的DDH(cDDH)。当ANIb > 75%时,比率(100 - cDDH)/(100 - ANIb)为3.69 ± 0.93(±标准差),在不同属之间从约2.35到4.59不等。属间差异高度显著(p < 0.001),但与特定的系统发育或生理类群无关。此外,当ANIb < 75%时,ANIm对ANIb的衡量效果不佳。由于ANIb和cDDH提供了不同的相关性衡量方法,在划分物种时不再适合同时考虑两者。基于这些原因,未来应使用基于序列同一性的相关性衡量方法来划分物种。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验