Fredriksson Mio, Blomqvist Paula, Winblad Ulrika
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 5;14:509. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0509-1.
The Swedish government has increasingly begun to rely on so called informative governance when regulating healthcare. The question this article sets out to answer is: considered to be "the backbone" of the Swedish state's strategy for informative governance in healthcare, what kind of regulatory arrangement is the evidence-based National Guidelines? Together with national medical registries and an extensive system of quality and efficiency indicators, the National Guidelines constitutes Sweden's quality management system.
A framework for evaluating and comparing regulatory arrangements was used. It asks for instance: what is the purpose of the regulation and are regulation methods oriented towards deterrence or compliance?
The Swedish National Guidelines is a regulatory arrangement intended to govern the prioritizations of all decision makers - politicians and administrators in the self-governing county councils as well as healthcare professionals - through a compliance model backed up by top-down benchmarking and built-in mechanisms for monitoring. It is thus an instrument for the central state to steer local political authorities. The purpose is to achieve equitable and cost-effective healthcare.
This article suggests that the use of evidence-based guidelines in Swedish healthcare should be seen in the light of Sweden's constitutional setting, with several autonomous levels of political authority negotiating the scope for their decision-making power. As decision-making capacity is relocated to the central government - from the democratically elected county councils responsible for financing and provision of healthcare - the Swedish National Guidelines is part of an ongoing process of healthcare recentralization in Sweden, reducing the scope for local decision-making. This represents a new aspect of evidence-based medicine (EBM) and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).
瑞典政府在监管医疗保健时越来越多地开始依赖所谓的信息治理。本文旨在回答的问题是:作为瑞典国家医疗保健信息治理战略的“支柱”,循证国家指南是何种监管安排?国家指南与国家医疗注册系统以及广泛的质量和效率指标体系共同构成了瑞典的质量管理体系。
采用了一个评估和比较监管安排的框架。例如,它会询问:监管的目的是什么,监管方法是侧重于威慑还是合规?
瑞典国家指南是一种监管安排,旨在通过由自上而下的基准化和内置监测机制支持的合规模式,来管理所有决策者——自治县议会中的政治家和管理人员以及医疗保健专业人员——的优先事项。因此,它是中央政府指导地方政治当局的一种工具。目的是实现公平且具成本效益的医疗保健。
本文表明,瑞典医疗保健中循证指南的使用应结合瑞典的宪法背景来看待,有多个自主的政治权力层级在协商其决策权范围。随着决策权从负责医疗保健融资和提供的民主选举产生的县议会转移到中央政府手中,瑞典国家指南是瑞典医疗保健不断集权化进程的一部分,减少了地方决策的空间。这代表了循证医学(EBM)和临床实践指南(CPG)的一个新方面。