• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS). Foreword.

作者信息

Crofton C, Lubalin J S, Darby C

机构信息

Center for Quality Measurement and Improvement, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 20852-4908, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS1-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00001.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-199903001-00001
PMID:10098554
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS). Foreword.消费者健康计划评估研究（CAHPS）。前言。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS1-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00001.
2
Making survey results easy to report to consumers: how reporting needs guided survey design in CAHPS. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.让调查结果易于向消费者报告：报告需求如何指导“医疗保健计划消费者评估（CAHPS）”中的调查设计。医疗保健计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS32-40. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00004.
3
The use of cognitive testing to develop and evaluate CAHPS 1.0 core survey items. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.使用认知测试来开发和评估CAHPS 1.0核心调查问卷项目。医疗计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS10-21. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00002.
4
Psychometric properties of the CAHPS 1.0 survey measures. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.CAHPS 1.0调查指标的心理测量特性。健康计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS22-31. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00003.
5
Comparing telephone and mail responses to the CAHPS survey instrument. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.比较对CAHPS调查问卷的电话回复和邮件回复。医疗计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS41-9. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00005.
6
Special issues addressed in the CAHPS survey of Medicare managed care beneficiaries. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.医疗保险管理式医疗受益人的CAHPS调查中涉及的特殊问题。健康计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS69-78. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00008.
7
Epilogue: Early lessons from CAHPS Demonstrations and Evaluations. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study.结语：CAHPS示范与评估的早期经验教训。健康计划消费者评估研究。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS97-105.
8
Special issues in assessing care of Medicaid recipients.评估医疗补助受助人护理情况的特殊问题。
Med Care. 1999 Mar;37(3 Suppl):MS79-88. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199903001-00009.
9
Similarities and differences in choosing health plans.选择健康保险计划的异同。
Med Care. 2002 Apr;40(4):289-302. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200204000-00005.
10
Do consumer reports of health plan quality affect health plan selection?消费者对健康计划质量的报告是否会影响健康计划的选择？
Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec;35(5 Pt 1):933-47.

引用本文的文献

1
The technical expert/clinical user/patient panel (TECUPP): centering patient and family perspectives in patient-reported measure development.技术专家/临床用户/患者小组（TECUPP）：在患者报告测量指标开发中以患者及家属的观点为核心
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jan 7;11(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00661-4.
2
Description of patient reported experience measures (PREMs) for hospitalised patients with palliative care needs and their families, and how these map to noted areas of importance for quality care: A systematic review.描述有姑息治疗需求的住院患者及其家属的患者报告体验测量（PREMs），以及这些测量如何映射到护理质量的重要关注领域：系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2023 Jul;37(7):898-914. doi: 10.1177/02692163231169319. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
3
A Systematic Review of Strategies to Enhance Response Rates and Representativeness of Patient Experience Surveys.
系统评价增强患者体验调查应答率和代表性的策略。
Med Care. 2022 Dec 1;60(12):910-918. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001784. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
4
Some Aspects of Patient Experience Assessed by Practices Undergoing Patient-Centered Medical Home Transformation Are Measured by CAHPS, Others Are Not.通过 CAHPS 衡量正在进行以患者为中心的医疗之家转型的实践所评估的患者体验的某些方面，其他方面则没有。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2020 Oct/Dec;29(4):179-187. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000263.
5
Perceptions of US Adolescents and Adults With Sickle Cell Disease on Their Quality of Care.美国镰状细胞病青少年和成年患者对其护理质量的认知。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e206016. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6016.
6
Redesigning primary care in an academic medical center: lessons, challenges, and opportunities.在学术医疗中心重新设计初级保健：经验、挑战和机遇。
Postgrad Med. 2020 Sep;132(7):636-642. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1773685. Epub 2020 Jun 7.
7
Development and Testing of the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey.《CAHPS 癌症护理调查的开发与测试》。
J Oncol Pract. 2019 Nov;15(11):e969-e978. doi: 10.1200/JOP.19.00039. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
8
Differences in Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group Survey Scores by Recency of the Last Visit: Implications for Comparability of Periodic and Continuous Sampling.消费者对医疗保健提供者和系统临床医生和小组调查评分的评估差异按最近一次就诊时间的不同：对定期和连续抽样可比性的影响。
Med Care. 2019 Dec;57(12):e80-e86. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001134.
9
What Words Convey: The Potential for Patient Narratives to Inform Quality Improvement.文字传达：患者叙事对质量改进的启示潜力。
Milbank Q. 2019 Mar;97(1):176-227. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12374.
10
Use of CAHPS patient experience survey data as part of a patient-centered medical home quality improvement initiative.将CAHPS患者体验调查数据用作以患者为中心的医疗之家质量改进计划的一部分。
J Healthc Leadersh. 2015 Jul 7;7:41-54. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S69963. eCollection 2015.