• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索在基于问题的学习中用动态网络虚拟患者取代纸质线性患者病例的效果:随机对照试验。

Exploring the efficacy of replacing linear paper-based patient cases in problem-based learning with dynamic Web-based virtual patients: randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Poulton Terry, Ellaway Rachel H, Round Jonathan, Jivram Trupti, Kavia Sheetal, Hilton Sean

机构信息

Institute of Medical and Biomedical Education, St George's, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 5;16(11):e240. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3748.

DOI:10.2196/jmir.3748
PMID:25373314
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4259985/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Problem-based learning (PBL) is well established in medical education and beyond, and continues to be developed and explored. Challenges include how to connect the somewhat abstract nature of classroom-based PBL with clinical practice and how to maintain learner engagement in the process of PBL over time.

OBJECTIVE

A study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of decision-PBL (D-PBL), a variant form of PBL that replaces linear PBL cases with virtual patients. These Web-based interactive cases provided learners with a series of patient management pathways. Learners were encouraged to consider and discuss courses of action, take their chosen management pathway, and experience the consequences of their decisions. A Web-based application was essential to allow scenarios to respond dynamically to learners' decisions, to deliver the scenarios to multiple PBL classrooms in the same timeframe, and to record centrally the paths taken by the PBL groups.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial in crossover design was run involving all learners (N=81) in the second year of the graduate entry stream for the undergraduate medicine program at St George's University of London. Learners were randomized to study groups; half engaged in a D-PBL activity whereas the other half had a traditional linear PBL activity on the same subject material. Groups alternated D-PBL and linear PBL over the semester. The measure was mean cohort performance on specific face-to-face exam questions at the end of the semester.

RESULTS

D-PBL groups performed better than linear PBL groups on questions related to D-PBL with the difference being statistically significant for all questions. Differences between the exam performances of the 2 groups were not statistically significant for the questions not related to D-PBL. The effect sizes for D-PBL-related questions were large and positive (>0.6) except for 1 question that showed a medium positive effect size. The effect sizes for questions not related to D-PBL were all small (≤0.3) with a mix of positive and negative values.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of D-PBL was indicated by improved exam performance for learners who had D-PBL compared to those who had linear PBL. This suggests that the use of D-PBL leads to better midterm learning outcomes than linear PBL, at least for learners with prior experience with linear PBL. On the basis of tutor and student feedback, St George's University of London and the University of Nicosia, Cyprus have replaced paper PBL cases for midstage undergraduate teaching with D-PBL virtual patients, and 6 more institutions in the ePBLnet partnership will be implementing D-PBL in Autumn 2015.

摘要

背景

基于问题的学习(PBL)在医学教育及其他领域已得到广泛应用,并且仍在不断发展和探索。挑战包括如何将基于课堂的PBL的抽象性质与临床实践联系起来,以及如何在PBL过程中长期保持学习者的参与度。

目的

开展一项研究以调查决策式PBL(D-PBL)的效果,D-PBL是PBL的一种变体形式,用虚拟患者取代了线性PBL案例。这些基于网络的交互式案例为学习者提供了一系列患者管理途径。鼓励学习者考虑并讨论行动方案,选择他们的管理途径,并体验其决策的后果。基于网络的应用程序对于使情景能够动态响应学习者的决策、在同一时间范围内将情景分发给多个PBL课堂以及集中记录PBL小组所采取的路径至关重要。

方法

在伦敦圣乔治大学本科医学项目研究生入学流的第二年,对所有学习者(N = 81)进行了交叉设计的随机对照试验。学习者被随机分配到各个学习小组;一半参与D-PBL活动,而另一半就相同主题材料进行传统的线性PBL活动。各小组在整个学期中交替进行D-PBL和线性PBL。衡量标准是学期末特定面对面考试问题上的平均群组表现。

结果

在与D-PBL相关的问题上,D-PBL小组的表现优于线性PBL小组,所有问题的差异均具有统计学意义。对于与D-PBL无关的问题,两组的考试成绩差异无统计学意义。除了1个问题显示出中等正向效应量外,与D-PBL相关问题的效应量均为大且正向(>0.6)。与D-PBL无关问题的效应量均较小(≤0.3),有正有负。

结论

与进行线性PBL的学习者相比,进行D-PBL的学习者考试成绩提高,表明了D-PBL的效果。这表明,至少对于有线性PBL经验的学习者来说,使用D-PBL比线性PBL能带来更好的中期学习成果。根据教师和学生的反馈,伦敦圣乔治大学和塞浦路斯尼科西亚大学已用D-PBL虚拟患者取代了本科中期教学中的纸质PBL案例,ePBLnet伙伴关系中的另外6所机构将于2015年秋季实施D-PBL。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8997/4259985/9497cea4b486/jmir_v16i11e240_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8997/4259985/7b1377e1c568/jmir_v16i11e240_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8997/4259985/4f2888dbb996/jmir_v16i11e240_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8997/4259985/9497cea4b486/jmir_v16i11e240_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8997/4259985/7b1377e1c568/jmir_v16i11e240_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8997/4259985/4f2888dbb996/jmir_v16i11e240_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8997/4259985/9497cea4b486/jmir_v16i11e240_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring the efficacy of replacing linear paper-based patient cases in problem-based learning with dynamic Web-based virtual patients: randomized controlled trial.探索在基于问题的学习中用动态网络虚拟患者取代纸质线性患者病例的效果:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 5;16(11):e240. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3748.
2
Medical Student and Tutor Perceptions of Video Versus Text in an Interactive Online Virtual Patient for Problem-Based Learning: A Pilot Study.基于问题学习的交互式在线虚拟患者中,医学生和导师对视频与文本的看法:一项初步研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jun 18;17(6):e151. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3922.
3
The replacement of 'paper' cases by interactive online virtual patients in problem-based learning.以互动式在线虚拟患者替代基于问题学习中的纸质病例。
Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):752-8. doi: 10.1080/01421590903141082.
4
The Development of a Virtual World Problem-Based Learning Tutorial and Comparison With Interactive Text-Based Tutorials.虚拟世界基于问题的学习教程的开发以及与交互式文本教程的比较。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Apr 20;3:611813. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.611813. eCollection 2021.
5
Decision PBL: A 4-year retrospective case study of the use of virtual patients in problem-based learning.决策式基于问题的学习:对基于问题的学习中虚拟患者使用情况的4年回顾性案例研究。
Med Teach. 2015;37(10):926-34. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.970627. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
6
Factors affecting pharmacology learning in integrated PBL in diverse medical students: a mixed methods study.影响多元化医学专业学生整合式 PBL 药理学学习的因素:混合方法研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):324. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05289-2.
7
Web-based collaborative training of clinical reasoning: a randomized trial.基于网络的临床推理协作培训:一项随机试验。
Med Teach. 2009 Sep;31(9):e431-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590903095502.
8
Virtual patients in a virtual world: Training paramedic students for practice.虚拟世界中的虚拟患者:为实践培训护理学生。
Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):713-20. doi: 10.1080/01421590903134160.
9
How we "breathed life" into problem-based learning cases using a mobile application.我们如何通过一款移动应用程序为基于问题的学习案例“注入活力”。
Med Teach. 2014 Oct;36(10):849-52. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.886771. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
10
Blended learning positively affects students' satisfaction and the role of the tutor in the problem-based learning process: results of a mixed-method evaluation.混合式学习对学生满意度和导师在基于问题的学习过程中的作用有积极影响:混合方法评估的结果。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009 Dec;14(5):725-38. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9154-6. Epub 2009 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Problem-Based Learning in Medical Education: A Global Research Landscape of the Last Ten Years (2013-2022).医学教育中的基于问题的学习:过去十年(2013 - 2022年)的全球研究概况
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Feb 21;34(3):551-560. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02003-1. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
A Comparison of Simulation-Based Education and Problem-Based Learning in Pre-Clinical Medical Undergraduates.基于模拟的教育与以问题为基础的学习在临床前医学本科生中的比较
MedEdPublish (2016). 2020 Aug 19;9:172. doi: 10.15694/mep.2020.000172.1. eCollection 2020.
3
Potential Barriers to the Implementation of Computer-Based Simulation in Pharmacy Education: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Virtual patients as activities: exploring the research implications of an activity theoretical stance.虚拟患者作为活动:探索活动理论立场的研究意义。
Perspect Med Educ. 2014 Sep;3(4):266-277. doi: 10.1007/s40037-014-0134-z.
2
Exploring design requirements for repurposing dental virtual patients from the web to second life: a focus group study.探索将网络牙科虚拟患者重新用于《第二人生》的设计要求:一项焦点小组研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jun 13;16(6):e151. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3343.
3
Developing the role of big data and analytics in health professional education.
药学教育中基于计算机模拟实施的潜在障碍:一项系统评价。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 May 17;11(3):86. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11030086.
4
The Development of a Virtual World Problem-Based Learning Tutorial and Comparison With Interactive Text-Based Tutorials.虚拟世界基于问题的学习教程的开发以及与交互式文本教程的比较。
Front Digit Health. 2021 Apr 20;3:611813. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.611813. eCollection 2021.
5
Using Video and Virtual Patients in Problem-Based Learning: a Scoping Review.在基于问题的学习中使用视频和虚拟患者:一项范围综述
Med Sci Educ. 2020 Oct 14;30(4):1685-1691. doi: 10.1007/s40670-020-01108-7. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Biosensor Real-Time Affective Analytics in Virtual and Mixed Reality Medical Education Serious Games: Cohort Study.虚拟与混合现实医学教育严肃游戏中的生物传感器实时情感分析:队列研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2020 Sep 2;8(3):e17823. doi: 10.2196/17823.
7
Virtual patients as a tool for training pre-registration pharmacists and increasing their preparedness to practice: A qualitative study.虚拟患者作为培训预注册药剂师和提高其实践准备度的工具:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 31;15(8):e0238226. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238226. eCollection 2020.
8
Actual vs. Perceived Competency Development-How Can Virtual Patients Impact Pharmacist Pre-Registration Training?实际能力发展与感知能力发展——虚拟患者如何影响药剂师预注册培训?
Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Aug 5;8(3):138. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8030138.
9
Virtual patients designed for training against medical error: Exploring the impact of decision-making on learner motivation.虚拟患者在防范医疗差错培训中的应用:决策对学习者动机的影响探索。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 23;14(4):e0215597. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215597. eCollection 2019.
10
What Can Be Achieved With Motivation-Based Teaching of Medical Students? A Monocentric Retrospective Audit of Retention Among Highly Motivated Graduates Who Underwent the Learning-by-Doing Concept in Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine.基于动机的医学生教学能取得什么成果?对在麻醉学和重症医学中接受实践学习理念的高积极性毕业生的留存情况进行的单中心回顾性审计。
JMIR Serious Games. 2019 Apr 9;7(2):e10155. doi: 10.2196/10155.
发挥大数据与分析在卫生专业教育中的作用。
Med Teach. 2014 Mar;36(3):216-22. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.874553. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
4
A framework for different levels of integration of computational models into web-based virtual patients.一个将计算模型集成到基于网络的虚拟患者中的不同层次框架。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 23;16(1):e23. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2593.
5
Virtual patients in primary care: developing a reusable model that fosters reflective practice and clinical reasoning.初级保健中的虚拟患者:开发一种促进反思性实践和临床推理的可重复使用模型。
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Jan 6;16(1):e3. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2616.
6
The process of problem-based learning: what works and why.基于问题的学习过程:有效之处及其原因。
Med Educ. 2011 Aug;45(8):792-806. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x.
7
Six ways problem-based learning cases can sabotage patient-centered medical education.基于问题的学习案例可能破坏以患者为中心的医学教育的六种方式。
Acad Med. 2011 Jul;86(7):818-25. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31821db670.
8
Design for learning: deconstructing virtual patient activities.设计学习:解构虚拟患者活动。
Med Teach. 2011;33(4):303-10. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.550969.
9
The replacement of 'paper' cases by interactive online virtual patients in problem-based learning.以互动式在线虚拟患者替代基于问题学习中的纸质病例。
Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):752-8. doi: 10.1080/01421590903141082.
10
Towards a typology of virtual patients.迈向虚拟患者的类型学。
Med Teach. 2009 Aug;31(8):743-8. doi: 10.1080/01421590903124708.