Suppr超能文献

Meta 分析抗精神病药治疗与安慰剂对照治疗神经性厌食症的疗效。

Meta analysis on the efficacy of pharmacotherapy versus placebo on anorexia nervosa.

机构信息

Arkin Mental Health Institute, Klaprozenweg 111, PO Box 75848, 1070 AV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Arkin Mental Health Institute, Klaprozenweg 111, PO Box 75848, 1070 AV Amsterdam, the Netherlands ; De Viersprong Mental Health Institute, Bergen op Zoom, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Eat Disord. 2014 Oct 30;2(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s40337-014-0027-x. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anorexia Nervosa (AN) has a devastating impact on the psychological and physical well being of affected individuals. There is an extensive body of literature on interventions in AN, however more studies are needed to establish which form of pharmacotherapy is effective. The few meta-analyses that have been done are based on one type of medication only. This article is the first to present data on three different, most commonly used, forms of pharmacotherapy. The primary objective of this meta-analysis was to create an overview and to determine the efficacy of three forms of pharmacotherapy (antidepressants, antipsychotics, hormonal therapy) compared to treatment with placebo in patients with AN.

METHOD

A systematic literature search was performed to identify all randomized controlled intervention trials investigating the effectiveness of pharmacotherapy for AN within the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase and Cochrane Library. In addition, 32 relevant reviews and meta-analyses were screened for additional intervention studies. A meta-analysis was performed on a total of 18 included studies (N = 869). Efficacy was measured in terms of weight gain or weight restoration.

RESULTS

The pooled effect sizes indicating the difference between antidepressants and placebo, and between antipsychotics and placebo on weight were not significant. Because of the small sample size no meta regression and subgroup analyses could be conducted. The pooled effect size indicating the difference between hormonal therapy and the placebo condition on weight (all weight measures) at post-treatment was 0.42 (95% CI: 0.11 ~ 0.73), which was significant. For hormonal therapy heterogeneity was high (I(2) = 64.70). No evidence for publication bias was found. Meta-regression analyses of the weeks of medication treatment (slope = -0.008) yielded a significant effect (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study we found that hormonal therapy has a significantly larger effect on weight compared to placebo in the treatment of AN. However for these analyses heterogeneity was high, which means that these results have to be regarded with caution. We found that anti-depressants and antipsychotics had no significant effect on weight compared to placebo in the treatment of AN, although the power to detect significant effects was too low.

摘要

背景

神经性厌食症(AN)对患者的身心健康有毁灭性的影响。针对 AN 的干预措施已有大量文献,但仍需要更多研究来确定哪种形式的药物治疗更有效。少数已完成的荟萃分析仅基于一种药物。本文首次提供了三种最常用的药物治疗形式的数据。这项荟萃分析的主要目的是概述并确定三种药物治疗形式(抗抑郁药、抗精神病药、激素治疗)与安慰剂相比在 AN 患者中的疗效。

方法

系统地检索了以下数据库中所有关于药物治疗 AN 有效性的随机对照干预试验:PubMed、PsycINFO、Embase 和 Cochrane Library。此外,还对 32 项相关综述和荟萃分析进行了筛选,以寻找额外的干预研究。对总共纳入的 18 项研究(N=869)进行了荟萃分析。疗效以体重增加或体重恢复来衡量。

结果

抗抑郁药与安慰剂相比,以及抗精神病药与安慰剂相比,体重的合并效应大小无显著差异。由于样本量小,无法进行荟萃回归和亚组分析。激素治疗与安慰剂条件在治疗后体重(所有体重指标)上的差异的合并效应大小为 0.42(95%CI:0.11~0.73),具有统计学意义。对于激素治疗,异质性较高(I(2)=64.70)。未发现发表偏倚的证据。对药物治疗周数(斜率=-0.008)的荟萃回归分析显示有显著效果(p=0.04)。

结论

在这项研究中,我们发现与安慰剂相比,激素治疗对 AN 的体重有显著更大的影响。然而,这些分析的异质性很高,这意味着这些结果需要谨慎对待。我们发现,与安慰剂相比,抗抑郁药和抗精神病药对 AN 的体重没有显著影响,尽管检测显著效果的效力太低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5b3c/4221720/d3e4741b3c4e/40337_2014_27_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验