Suppr超能文献

成人精神障碍的心理治疗和药物治疗效果:近期荟萃分析的伞状综述和荟萃分析评估

The efficacy of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders in adults: an umbrella review and meta-analytic evaluation of recent meta-analyses.

作者信息

Leichsenring Falk, Steinert Christiane, Rabung Sven, Ioannidis John P A

机构信息

Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.

Department of Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):133-145. doi: 10.1002/wps.20941.

Abstract

Mental disorders represent a worldwide public health concern. Psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies are recommended as first line treatments. However, evidence has emerged that their efficacy may be overestimated, due to a variety of shortcomings in clinical trials (e.g., publication bias, weak control conditions such as waiting list). We performed an umbrella review of recent meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for the main mental disorders in adults. We selected meta-analyses that formally assessed risk of bias or quality of studies, excluded weak comparators, and used effect sizes for target symptoms as primary outcome. We searched PubMed and PsycINFO and individual records of the Cochrane Library for meta-analyses published between January 2014 and March 2021 comparing psychotherapies or pharmacotherapies with placebo or treatment-as-usual (TAU), or psychotherapies vs. pharmacotherapies head-to-head, or the combination of psychotherapy with pharmacotherapy to either monotherapy. One hundred and two meta-analyses, encompassing 3,782 RCTs and 650,514 patients, were included, covering depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, somatoform disorders, eating disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, substance use disorders, insomnia, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, and bipolar disorder. Across disorders and treatments, the majority of effect sizes for target symptoms were small. A random effect meta-analytic evaluation of the effect sizes reported by the largest meta-analyses per disorder yielded a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.34 (95% CI: 0.26-0.42) for psychotherapies and 0.36 (95% CI: 0.32-0.41) for pharmacotherapies compared with placebo or TAU. The SMD for head-to-head comparisons of psychotherapies vs. pharmacotherapies was 0.11 (95% CI: -0.05 to 0.26). The SMD for the combined treatment compared with either monotherapy was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.19-0.44). Risk of bias was often high. After more than half a century of research, thousands of RCTs and millions of invested funds, the effect sizes of psychotherapies and pharmacotherapies for mental disorders are limited, suggesting a ceiling effect for treatment research as presently conducted. A paradigm shift in research seems to be required to achieve further progress.

摘要

精神障碍是一个全球性的公共卫生问题。心理治疗和药物治疗被推荐作为一线治疗方法。然而,有证据表明,由于临床试验存在各种缺陷(如发表偏倚、诸如等待名单等薄弱的对照条件),它们的疗效可能被高估了。我们对近期关于成人主要精神障碍的心理治疗和药物治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析进行了一项综合评价。我们选择了正式评估研究偏倚风险或质量的荟萃分析,排除了薄弱的对照,并用目标症状的效应量作为主要结局。我们在PubMed、PsycINFO以及Cochrane图书馆的个别记录中搜索了2014年1月至2021年3月期间发表的荟萃分析,这些分析比较了心理治疗或药物治疗与安慰剂或常规治疗(TAU),或心理治疗与药物治疗的直接比较,或心理治疗与药物治疗的联合治疗与单一治疗。纳入了102项荟萃分析,涵盖3782项RCT和650514名患者,涉及抑郁症、焦虑症、创伤后应激障碍、强迫症、躯体形式障碍、进食障碍、注意力缺陷/多动障碍、物质使用障碍、失眠、精神分裂症谱系障碍和双相情感障碍。在各种障碍和治疗方法中,目标症状的大多数效应量都很小。对每种障碍最大的荟萃分析报告的效应量进行随机效应荟萃分析评估,结果显示,与安慰剂或TAU相比,心理治疗的标准化平均差(SMD)为0.34(95%CI:0.26 - 0.42),药物治疗的标准化平均差为0.36(95%CI:0.32 - 0.41)。心理治疗与药物治疗直接比较的SMD为0.11(95%CI: - 0.05至0.26)。联合治疗与单一治疗相比的SMD为0.31(95%CI:0.19 - 0.44)。偏倚风险通常较高。经过半个多世纪的研究、数千项RCT以及数百万的资金投入,心理治疗和药物治疗对精神障碍的效应量有限,这表明目前进行的治疗研究存在天花板效应。似乎需要研究范式的转变才能取得进一步进展。

相似文献

6
Psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa and binging.神经性贪食症和暴饮暴食的心理治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(4):CD000562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000562.
7
Psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa and binging.神经性贪食症和暴饮暴食的心理治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD000562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000562.
9
Psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa and binging.神经性贪食症和暴饮暴食的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD000562. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000562.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

3
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验