Suppr超能文献

软性义齿衬垫材料对体外 L929 细胞的生物学效应。

Biological effects of soft denture reline materials on L929 cells in vitro.

机构信息

Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Araraquara Dental School, UNESP - Univ. Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, Brazil.

Department of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London, UK.

出版信息

J Tissue Eng. 2014 Jun 23;5:2041731414540911. doi: 10.1177/2041731414540911. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Soft denture reline materials have been developed to help patients when their oral mucosa is damaged or affected due to ill-fitting dentures or post-implant surgery. Although reports have indicated that these materials leach monomers and other components that do affect their biocompatibility, there is little information on what cell molecules may be implicated in these material/tissue interactions. The biocompatibility of six soft liners (Ufi Gel P, Sofreliner S, Durabase Soft, Trusoft, Softone and Coe Comfort) was evaluated using a mouse fibroblast cell line, L929. Within 2 h of material disc preparation, each of the materials was exposed by direct contact to L929 cells for periods of 24 and 48 h. The effect of this interaction was assessed by alamarBlue assay (for cell survival). The expression of integrin α5β1 and transforming growth factor β1 was also assessed using plate assays such as enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Trusoft, Softone and Coe Comfort showed significantly reduced cell survival compared with the other soft lining materials at each incubation period. Furthermore, there were significant differences with these same materials in the expression of both integrin α5β1 and transforming growth factor β1. Soft liner materials may affect cell viability and cellular proteins that have important roles in wound healing and the preservation of cell viability and function in the presence of environmental challenges and stresses.

摘要

软衬材料的发展是为了帮助那些由于义齿不合适或种植体手术后口腔黏膜受损或受到影响的患者。虽然有报道称这些材料会浸出单体和其他成分,从而影响其生物相容性,但关于哪些细胞分子可能与这些材料/组织相互作用有关的信息却很少。本研究使用小鼠成纤维细胞系 L929 评估了六种软衬材料(Ufi Gel P、Sofreliner S、Durabase Soft、Trusoft、Softone 和 Coe Comfort)的生物相容性。在材料圆盘制备后 2 小时内,将每种材料直接与 L929 细胞接触 24 和 48 小时。通过 alamarBlue 测定法(用于细胞存活)评估这种相互作用的效果。还使用酶联免疫吸附测定等平板测定法评估了整合素 α5β1 和转化生长因子 β1 的表达。与其他软衬材料相比,在每个孵育期,Trusoft、Softone 和 Coe Comfort 均显示出明显降低的细胞存活率。此外,在整合素 α5β1 和转化生长因子 β1 的表达方面,这些材料也存在显著差异。软衬材料可能会影响细胞活力和细胞蛋白,这些蛋白在环境挑战和压力下的伤口愈合以及细胞活力和功能的维持中具有重要作用。

相似文献

1
Biological effects of soft denture reline materials on L929 cells in vitro.软性义齿衬垫材料对体外 L929 细胞的生物学效应。
J Tissue Eng. 2014 Jun 23;5:2041731414540911. doi: 10.1177/2041731414540911. eCollection 2014.
7
Analysis of the Hardness of Soft Relining Materials for Removable Dentures.可摘义齿软衬材料硬度分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 8;18(18):9491. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189491.

本文引用的文献

2
Predicting clinical biological responses to dental materials.预测牙科材料的临床生物反应
Dent Mater. 2012 Jan;28(1):23-40. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.08.595.
9
Biodegradation of acrylic based resins: A review.丙烯酸类树脂的生物降解:综述。
Dent Mater. 2010 May;26(5):e171-80. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2010.01.006. Epub 2010 Feb 26.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验