Lee Chang-Kyu, Rho Seung Soo, Sung Gong Je, Kim Na Rae, Yang Jong Yun, Lee Na Eun, Hong Samin, Kim Chan Yun
*Department of Ophthalmology, Institute of Vision Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul †Department of Ophthalmology, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
J Glaucoma. 2015 Aug;24(6):405-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000043.
To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of combined phacoemulsification and goniosynechialysis (PEGS) to phacoemulsification alone (PE) in patients with medically well-controlled chronic angle-closure glaucoma (CACG) with cataracts.
Thirty eyes diagnosed with CACG and requiring cataract surgery from January 2008 to October 2010 were prospectively randomized, 15 each to PE and PEGS. Changes in peripheral anterior synechiae (PAS), intraocular pressure (IOP), anterior chamber depth, and number of antiglaucoma drugs from baseline to 2 months after the operation were analyzed, as were the type and number of complications.
The PE group showed decreases in PAS (118.67±95.38 degrees) and IOP (2.33±2.38 mm Hg) and a significant reduction in the number of antiglaucoma drugs (0.53±0.83, P<0.05) from before to 2 months after surgery. The PEGS group showed similar decreases in PAS (114.00±90.95 degrees), and IOP (4.53±4.16 mm Hg) and number of antiglaucoma drugs (1.20±1.32) (P<0.05). However, the amount of decline in both the groups did not show any significantly difference in PAS, reduction of IOP, or number of antiglaucoma drugs (P>0.05), The increase in anterior chamber depth from baseline to 2 months after surgery was significantly greater in the PEGS group (P=0.003).
The IOP-lowering effects of PEGS do not differ significantly from those of PE in medically well-controlled CACG patients with cataract. These results suggest that additional goniosynechialysis during phacoemulsification is not necessary in such patients.
评估并比较在药物控制良好的慢性闭角型青光眼(CACG)合并白内障患者中,超声乳化白内障吸除联合房角粘连分离术(PEGS)与单纯超声乳化白内障吸除术(PE)的疗效和安全性。
2008年1月至2010年10月期间诊断为CACG且需要进行白内障手术的30只眼睛被前瞻性随机分组,每组15只,分别接受PE和PEGS治疗。分析了从基线到术后2个月周边前粘连(PAS)、眼压(IOP)、前房深度和抗青光眼药物数量的变化,以及并发症的类型和数量。
PE组术后2个月与术前相比,PAS减少(118.67±95.38度),IOP降低(2.33±2.38 mmHg),抗青光眼药物数量显著减少(0.53±0.83,P<0.05)。PEGS组PAS减少(114.00±90.95度)、IOP降低(4.53±4.16 mmHg)以及抗青光眼药物数量减少(1.20±1.32)情况相似(P<0.05)。然而,两组在PAS减少量、IOP降低程度或抗青光眼药物数量方面的下降幅度均无显著差异(P>0.05)。PEGS组术后2个月前房深度较基线的增加幅度显著更大(P=0.003)。
在药物控制良好的CACG合并白内障患者中,PEGS降低眼压的效果与PE相比无显著差异。这些结果表明,在此类患者的超声乳化白内障吸除术中无需额外进行房角粘连分离术。