• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

依那普利与阿替洛尔治疗轻至中度高血压的比较。

Comparison of enalapril and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension.

作者信息

Herrick A L, Waller P C, Berkin K E, Pringle S D, Callender J S, Robertson M P, Findlay J G, Murray G D, Reid J L, Lorimer A R

机构信息

Glasgow Blood Pressure Clinic, University of Glasgow, Scotland.

出版信息

Am J Med. 1989 Apr;86(4):421-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90340-9.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9343(89)90340-9
PMID:2539017
Abstract

PURPOSE

Short-term therapy with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for hypertension is effective and well tolerated, and compared with beta blockers, may cause fewer adverse reactions. Furthermore, enalapril has been observed to have a greater effect on systolic blood pressure than beta blockers. We therefore decided to compare the ACE inhibitor enalapril and the beta blocker atenolol as monotherapy in a double-blind study of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After a four-week placebo run-in period, 162 patients were allocated randomly to receive atenolol (50 to 100 mg daily) or enalapril (20 to 40 mg daily) for 12 weeks. To assess the influence of these drugs on quality of life, a series of psychologic tests was performed, and a subset of patients also underwent treadmill exercise and pulmonary function tests.

RESULTS

In 147 patients who completed the study, enalapril reduced supine blood pressure by 19/12 mm Hg, compared with 9/7 mm Hg for atenolol (p less than 0.001/p less than 0.005). The modest blood pressure response to atenolol was not due to poor compliance. A target blood pressure of 140/90 mm Hg or less was achieved by 35 percent of enalapril-treated atenolol (p less than 0.01). The frequency and severity of adverse effects with the two drugs were similar, and few important differences emerged from the quality-of-life assessments.

CONCLUSION

At the doses used, enalapril induced a greater short-term blood pressure response than atenolol; long-term studies of its safety and efficacy are required.

摘要

目的

血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂用于高血压的短期治疗有效且耐受性良好,与β受体阻滞剂相比,不良反应可能更少。此外,已观察到依那普利对收缩压的影响大于β受体阻滞剂。因此,我们决定在一项针对轻至中度高血压患者的双盲研究中,比较ACE抑制剂依那普利和β受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔作为单一疗法的效果。

患者与方法

在为期四周的安慰剂导入期后,162例患者被随机分配接受阿替洛尔(每日50至100毫克)或依那普利(每日20至40毫克)治疗12周。为评估这些药物对生活质量的影响,进行了一系列心理测试,部分患者还接受了跑步机运动和肺功能测试。

结果

在完成研究的147例患者中,依那普利使仰卧位血压降低19/12毫米汞柱,而阿替洛尔为9/7毫米汞柱(p<0.001/p<0.005)。阿替洛尔血压反应适度并非由于依从性差。依那普利治疗组有35%的患者达到了140/90毫米汞柱或更低的目标血压,而阿替洛尔组为19%(p<0.01)。两种药物不良反应的频率和严重程度相似,生活质量评估中未出现重要差异。

结论

在所使用的剂量下,依那普利比阿替洛尔引起更大的短期血压反应;需要对其安全性和疗效进行长期研究。

相似文献

1
Comparison of enalapril and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension.依那普利与阿替洛尔治疗轻至中度高血压的比较。
Am J Med. 1989 Apr;86(4):421-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90340-9.
2
Comparison of monotherapy with enalapril and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension. The Canadian Enalapril Study Group.依那普利与阿替洛尔单药治疗轻至中度高血压的比较。加拿大依那普利研究小组。
CMAJ. 1987 Nov 1;137(9):803-8.
3
Adjunctive sympathoplegic therapy to ACE inhibition in Blacks with congestive heart failure: a comparison of alpha-1 with beta-1 blockade on exercise tolerance and cardiac sympathovagal reflex activity.充血性心力衰竭黑人患者中,在使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂基础上加用交感神经阻滞治疗:α-1受体阻滞与β-1受体阻滞对运动耐量和心脏交感迷走神经反射活动影响的比较
Ethn Dis. 2003 Winter;13(1):71-9.
4
Comparison of the combination of enalapril and a very low dose of hydrochlorothiazide with atenolol in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Scandinavian Study Group.依那普利与极低剂量氢氯噻嗪联合用药与阿替洛尔治疗轻至中度高血压患者的比较。斯堪的纳维亚研究小组。
Am J Hypertens. 1997 Aug;10(8):899-904. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(97)00110-6.
5
Enalapril and atenolol in primary hypertension--a comparative study of blood pressure lowering and hormonal effects.依那普利与阿替洛尔治疗原发性高血压——降压及激素效应的对比研究
Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl. 1984;79:93-7.
6
Enalapril, atenolol, and hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate hypertension. A comparative multicentre study in general practice in Norway.依那普利、阿替洛尔和氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度高血压:挪威全科医疗中的一项比较性多中心研究
Lancet. 1986 Apr 19;1(8486):872-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90985-2.
7
Enalapril versus atenolol in the treatment of hypertensive smokers.依那普利与阿替洛尔治疗高血压吸烟者的疗效比较
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;44(1):13-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00315273.
8
Randomised, double blind, multicentre comparison of hydrochlorothiazide, atenolol, nitrendipine, and enalapril in antihypertensive treatment: results of the HANE study. HANE Trial Research Group.氢氯噻嗪、阿替洛尔、尼群地平和依那普利在抗高血压治疗中的随机、双盲、多中心比较:HANE研究结果。HANE试验研究组
BMJ. 1997 Jul 19;315(7101):154-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7101.154.
9
Quality of life among hypertensive patients with a diuretic background who are taking atenolol and enalapril.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1990 Oct;48(4):447-54. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1990.174.
10
Manidipine versus enalapril monotherapy in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, 24-week study.马尼地平与依那普利单药治疗高血压合并2型糖尿病患者的多中心、随机、双盲、24周研究。
Clin Ther. 2005 Feb;27(2):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.02.001.

引用本文的文献

1
Peripheral vasoconstriction induced by β-adrenoceptor blockers: a systematic review and a network meta-analysis.β肾上腺素受体阻滞剂引起的外周血管收缩:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;82(2):549-60. doi: 10.1111/bcp.12980. Epub 2016 May 31.
2
The Effects of Oral Atenolol or Enalapril Premedication on Blood Loss and Hypotensive Anesthesia in Orthognathic Surgery.口服阿替洛尔或依那普利预处理对正颌外科手术失血及低血压麻醉的影响
Yonsei Med J. 2015 Jul;56(4):1114-21. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.4.1114.
3
Health-related quality-of-life measurement in hypertension. A review of randomised controlled drug trials.
高血压患者健康相关生活质量的测量:随机对照药物试验综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Nov;18(5):435-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200018050-00003.
4
Selective versus nonselective beta adrenoceptor antagonists in hypertension.高血压治疗中选择性与非选择性β肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂的比较
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Dec;8(6):513-23. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199508060-00006.
5
Quality-of-life instruments in hypertension.高血压患者生活质量评估工具
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Dec;6(6):523-35. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199406060-00006.
6
Cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive treatment: metoprolol versus thiazide diuretics.抗高血压治疗的成本效益:美托洛尔与噻嗪类利尿剂的比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 Jan;3(1):36-44. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199303010-00005.
7
Quality of life evaluation of antihypertensive drugs.抗高血压药物的生活质量评估
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Feb;1(2):95-102. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199201020-00006.
8
Quality of life claims in trials of anti-hypertensive therapy.抗高血压治疗试验中的生活质量声明。
Qual Life Res. 1997 Mar;6(2):185-91. doi: 10.1023/a:1026498318938.
9
Enalapril versus atenolol in the treatment of hypertensive smokers.依那普利与阿替洛尔治疗高血压吸烟者的疗效比较
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;44(1):13-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00315273.
10
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors as potential cognitive enhancing agents.血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂作为潜在的认知增强剂。
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 1994 Jan;19(1):46-50.