Chun F K H, Becker A, Kluth L A, Seiler D, Schnell D, Fisch M, Graefen M, Weissbach L
Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie Hamburg, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland.
Urologe A. 2015 Jan;54(1):6-13. doi: 10.1007/s00120-014-3647-5.
To date, evidence on active surveillance (AS) is restricted to protocol-based studies and the current practice pattern outside medical centers is unknown.
The goal of this work was to capture the current treatment pattern of AS for localized prostate cancer (PCa) in patients managed by office-based urologists in Germany.
Our cohort consisted of 361 patients included in the AS arm of the HAROW (Hormonal Treatment, Active Surveillance, Radiation Therapy, OP, Watchful Waiting) study, an observational health service study in Germany. Descriptive characteristics and active-treatment-free survival (ATFS), surgical outcomes, and triggers for active treatment were assessed.
Currently, only 15% of all patients with localized PCa were treated with AS. At baseline, 83% and 58% of all AS patients met the Chism and PRIAS low-risk criteria, respectively. After a median follow-up of 24 months, no systemic progression was observed, 5 patients died of non-disease-specific causes and active treatment was delivered in 20.5% of all patients. Triggers for active therapy were progression at biopsy (42%), rise in prostate-specific antigen level (27%), medical advice (16%) and patient's preference (10%), respectively.
Our short-term results indicate that - in the hands of office-based urologists - active surveillance might represent a feasible treatment option for patients with localized PCa. The majority of patients were free of active treatment 2 years after AS initiation. Generally accepted inclusion and progression criteria are lacking and should be developed in order to facilitate and standardize AS in patients with low-risk PCa.
迄今为止,关于主动监测(AS)的证据仅限于基于方案的研究,而医疗中心以外的当前实践模式尚不清楚。
这项工作的目标是了解德国门诊泌尿科医生管理的局限性前列腺癌(PCa)患者的AS当前治疗模式。
我们的队列由361名纳入HAROW(激素治疗、主动监测、放射治疗、手术、观察等待)研究AS组的患者组成,这是一项德国的观察性卫生服务研究。评估了描述性特征、无主动治疗生存期(ATFS)、手术结果和主动治疗的触发因素。
目前,所有局限性PCa患者中只有15%接受了AS治疗。在基线时,所有AS患者中分别有83%和58%符合Chism和PRIAS低风险标准。中位随访24个月后,未观察到全身进展,5例患者死于非疾病特异性原因,20.5%的患者接受了主动治疗。主动治疗的触发因素分别为活检进展(42%)、前列腺特异性抗原水平升高(27%)、医学建议(16%)和患者偏好(10%)。
我们的短期结果表明,在门诊泌尿科医生手中,主动监测可能是局限性PCa患者的一种可行治疗选择。大多数患者在开始AS治疗2年后未接受主动治疗。缺乏普遍接受的纳入和进展标准,应制定这些标准以促进和规范低风险PCa患者的AS治疗。