Cloyd Jordan M, Yang Rachel L, Allison Kimberly H, Norton Jeffrey A, Hernandez-Boussard Tina, Wapnir Irene L
Departments of Surgery, Stanford University, 300 Pasteur Dr, MC5641, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA,
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Dec;148(3):637-44. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3207-0. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
Although rare, neuroendocrine carcinoma of the breast (NECB) is becoming an increasingly recognized entity. The current literature is limited to case reports and small series and therefore a comprehensive population-based analysis was conducted to investigate the clinicopathologic features and long-term outcomes associated with NECB. We included all patients in the SEER Database from 2003 to 2010 with a diagnosis of NECB. The 2012 WHO classification system was used to categorize patients based on histopathologic diagnosis: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, small/oat cell or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, adenocarcinoma with neuroendocrine features (ANF), large cell neuroendocrine and carcinoid tumors. Survival analysis was performed for disease specific (DSS) and overall (OS) survival. Of the 284 cases identified, 52.1% were classified as well-differentiated, 25.7% small cell, 14.8% ANF, 4.9% large cell, and 2.5% carcinoid. In general, patients presented with advanced disease: 36.2% had positive lymph node metastases and 20.4% presented with systemic metastases. Five-year DSS rates for stage I-IV NECB were 88.1, 67.8, 60.5, and 12.4%, respectively, while five-year OS rates were 77.9, 57.3, 52.9, and 8.9%, respectively. DSS and OS were significantly different for well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors and ANFs compared to small cell and carcinoid tumors. On univariate Cox proportional hazards regression, small cell carcinoma was significantly associated with worse DSS (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.05-3.67) and OS (OR 2.66, 95% CI 1.49-4.72) compared to other neuroendocrine tumors. NECB is associated with advanced stage disease at presentation and an unfavorable prognosis for stage II-IV disease and small cell, large cell, and carcinoid histologic subtypes.
尽管乳腺神经内分泌癌(NECB)较为罕见,但它正日益成为一个被认识的实体。当前的文献仅限于病例报告和小样本系列研究,因此我们进行了一项基于人群的综合分析,以研究NECB的临床病理特征和长期预后。我们纳入了2003年至2010年SEER数据库中所有诊断为NECB的患者。采用2012年世界卫生组织分类系统根据组织病理学诊断对患者进行分类:高分化神经内分泌肿瘤、小/燕麦细胞或低分化神经内分泌肿瘤、具有神经内分泌特征的腺癌(ANF)、大细胞神经内分泌肿瘤和类癌肿瘤。对疾病特异性生存(DSS)和总生存(OS)进行了生存分析。在确定的284例病例中,52.1%被分类为高分化,25.7%为小细胞,14.8%为ANF,4.9%为大细胞,2.5%为类癌。总体而言,患者多表现为晚期疾病:36.2%有阳性淋巴结转移且20.4%有远处转移。I-IV期NECB的五年DSS率分别为88.1%、67.8%、60.5%和12.4%,而五年OS率分别为77.9%、57.3%、52.9%和8.9%。与小细胞和类癌肿瘤相比,高分化神经内分泌肿瘤和ANF的DSS和OS有显著差异。在单因素Cox比例风险回归分析中,与其他神经内分泌肿瘤相比,小细胞癌与更差的DSS(OR 1.97,95%CI 1.05-3.67)和OS(OR 2.66,95%CI 1.49-4.72)显著相关。NECB在初诊时与晚期疾病相关,且II-IV期疾病以及小细胞、大细胞和类癌组织学亚型的预后不良。