Suppr超能文献

Rockwood分类法在急性肩锁关节脱位中的观察者间及观察者内可靠性

Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Rockwood classification in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

作者信息

Schneider M M, Balke M, Koenen P, Fröhlich M, Wafaisade A, Bouillon B, Banerjee M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Traumatology and Sports Medicine, Cologne Merheim Medical Center (CMMC), University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimer Str. 200, 51109, Cologne, Germany.

Orthopaedic Surgery, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jul;24(7):2192-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3436-0. Epub 2014 Nov 16.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The reliability of the Rockwood classification, the gold standard for acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint separations, has not yet been tested. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of visual and measured AC joint lesion grades according to the Rockwood classification.

METHODS

Four investigators (two shoulder specialists and two second-year residents) examined radiographs (bilateral panoramic stress and axial views) in 58 patients and graded the injury according to the Rockwood classification using the following sequence: (1) visual classification of the AC joint lesion, (2) digital measurement of the coracoclavicular distance (CCD) and the horizontal dislocation (HD) with Osirix Dicom Viewer (Pixmeo, Switzerland), (3) classification of the AC joint lesion according to the measurements and (4) repetition of (1) and (2) after repeated anonymization by an independent physician. Visual and measured Rockwood grades as well as the CCD and HD of every patient were documented, and a CC index was calculated (CCD injured/CCD healthy). All records were then used to evaluate intra- and interobserver reliability.

RESULTS

The disagreement between visual and measured diagnosis ranged from 6.9 to 27.6 %. Interobserver reliability for visual diagnosis was good (0.72-0.74) and excellent (0.85-0.93) for measured Rockwood grades. Intraobserver reliability was good to excellent (0.67-0.93) for visual diagnosis and excellent for measured diagnosis (0.90-0.97). The correlations between measurements of the axial view varied from 0.68 to 0.98 (good to excellent) for interobserver reliability and from 0.90 to 0.97 (excellent) for intraobserver reliability.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral panoramic stress and axial radiographs are reliable examinations for grading AC joint injuries according to Rockwood's classification. Clinicians of all experience levels can precisely classify AC joint lesions according to the Rockwood classification. We recommend to grade acute ACG lesions by performing a digital measurement instead of a sole visual diagnosis because of the higher intra- and interobserver reliability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case series, Level IV.

摘要

目的

急性肩锁关节(AC)脱位的金标准——Rockwood分类法的可靠性尚未得到验证。本研究旨在探讨根据Rockwood分类法对AC关节损伤等级进行视觉评估和测量评估的可靠性。

方法

四名研究人员(两名肩部专家和两名二年级住院医师)对58例患者的X线片(双侧全景应力位和轴位片)进行检查,并按以下顺序根据Rockwood分类法对损伤进行分级:(1)对AC关节损伤进行视觉分类;(2)使用Osirix Dicom Viewer(瑞士Pixmeo公司)对喙锁距离(CCD)和水平移位(HD)进行数字测量;(3)根据测量结果对AC关节损伤进行分类;(4)由一名独立医生对影像进行重复匿名处理后,重复步骤(1)和(2)。记录每位患者的视觉和测量Rockwood分级以及CCD和HD,并计算CC指数(受伤侧CCD/健侧CCD)。然后使用所有记录评估观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。

结果

视觉诊断与测量诊断之间的分歧率为6.9%至27.6%。观察者间视觉诊断的可靠性良好(0.72 - 0.74),测量Rockwood分级的可靠性优秀(0.85 - 0.93)。观察者内视觉诊断的可靠性良好至优秀(0.67 - 0.93),测量诊断的可靠性优秀(0.90 - 0.97)。轴位片测量结果的观察者间可靠性相关性为0.68至0.98(良好至优秀),观察者内可靠性相关性为0.90至0.97(优秀)。

结论

双侧全景应力位和轴位X线片是根据Rockwood分类法对AC关节损伤进行分级的可靠检查方法。所有经验水平的临床医生均可根据Rockwood分类法对AC关节损伤进行准确分类。由于观察者内和观察者间可靠性更高,我们建议通过数字测量而非单纯的视觉诊断对急性ACG损伤进行分级。

证据水平

病例系列,IV级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验