• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肩锁关节脱位的垂直和水平不稳定的新定量放射学参数。

New quantitative radiographic parameters for vertical and horizontal instability in acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

机构信息

Shoulder, Elbow and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.

Department of Radiology, Inselspital, Bern University HospitalUniversity of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jan;26(1):125-135. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4579-6. Epub 2017 May 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00167-017-4579-6
PMID:28547587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5754414/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify the most accurate and reliable quantitative radiographic parameters for assessing vertical and horizontal instability in different Rockwood grades of acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) separations. Furthermore, the effect of projectional variation on these parameters was investigated in obtaining lateral Alexander view radiographs.

METHODS

A Sawbone model of a scapula with clavicle was mounted on a holding device, and acromioclavicular dislocations as per the Rockwood classification system were simulated with the addition of horizontal posterior displacement. Projectional variations for each injury type were performed by tilting/rotating the Sawbone construct in the coronal, sagittal or axial plane. Radiographic imaging in the form of an anterior-posterior Zanca view and a lateral Alexander view were taken for each injury type and each projectional variation. Five newly defined radiographic parameters for assessing horizontal and vertical displacement as well as commonly used coracoclavicular distance view were measured. Reliability, validity and the effect of projectional variation were investigated for these radiographic measurements.

RESULTS

All radiographic parameters showed excellent intra- and interobserver reliability. The validity was excellent for the acromial centre line to dorsal clavicle (AC-DC) in vertical displacement and for the glenoid centre line to posterior clavicle (GC-PC) in horizontal displacement, whilst the remaining measurements showed moderate validity. For AC-DC and GC-PC, convergent validity expressed strong correlation to the effective distance and discriminant validity demonstrated its ability to differentiate between various grades of ACJ dislocations. The effect of projectional variation increased with the degree of deviation and was maximal (3 mm) for AC-DC in 20° anteverted malpositioning and for GC-PC in 20° retroverted malpositioning.

CONCLUSIONS

AC-DC and the GC-PC are two novel quantitative radiographic parameters of vertical and horizontal instability in ACJ dislocations that demonstrate excellent reliability and validity with reasonable inertness to malpositioning. The use of AC-DC for assessing vertical displacement and GC-PC for assessing horizontal displacement in a single Alexander view is recommended to guide the appropriate management of ACJ dislocations. A better appreciation of the degree of horizontal instability, especially in lower Rockwood grades (II, III) of ACJ dislocations, may improve management of these controversial injuries.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定评估不同 Rockwood 分级肩锁关节(ACJ)分离的垂直和水平不稳定的最准确和可靠的定量影像学参数。此外,还研究了在获得侧位 Alexander 视图 X 线片时,投照变异对这些参数的影响。

方法

将肩胛骨和锁骨的 Sawbone 模型安装在固定装置上,并通过在冠状面、矢状面或轴面倾斜/旋转 Sawbone 结构来模拟 Rockwood 分类系统中的肩锁关节脱位。对每种损伤类型进行投照变异,形成前后 Zanca 视图和侧位 Alexander 视图的影像学图像。对每种损伤类型和每种投照变异都进行了测量。测量了 5 种新定义的用于评估水平和垂直移位的影像学参数以及常用的喙锁间距视图。对这些影像学测量的可靠性、有效性和投照变异的影响进行了研究。

结果

所有影像学参数均表现出良好的组内和组间可靠性。在垂直移位方面,肩峰中心到锁骨背侧(AC-DC)的有效性为优秀,在水平移位方面,关节盂中心到锁骨后侧(GC-PC)的有效性为优秀,而其余测量值的有效性为中度。对于 AC-DC 和 GC-PC,收敛有效性表达为与有效距离的强相关性,判别有效性证明其能够区分不同等级的 ACJ 脱位。投照变异的影响随着偏差程度的增加而增加,在 20°前旋错位时,AC-DC 的影响最大(3mm),在 20°后旋错位时,GC-PC 的影响最大(3mm)。

结论

AC-DC 和 GC-PC 是评估 ACJ 脱位垂直和水平不稳定的两种新的定量影像学参数,它们具有良好的可靠性和有效性,并且对投照位置的变化具有合理的惰性。建议在单个 Alexander 视图中使用 AC-DC 评估垂直移位,使用 GC-PC 评估水平移位,以指导 ACJ 脱位的适当治疗。更好地了解水平不稳定的程度,特别是在 Rockwood 分级较低(II、III)的 ACJ 脱位中,可能会改善这些有争议的损伤的治疗。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b548/5754414/8aa0eda9fd8f/167_2017_4579_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b548/5754414/e090b1621954/167_2017_4579_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b548/5754414/84880d10262b/167_2017_4579_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b548/5754414/20457b402a20/167_2017_4579_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b548/5754414/3b87db9d11ac/167_2017_4579_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b548/5754414/8aa0eda9fd8f/167_2017_4579_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b548/5754414/e090b1621954/167_2017_4579_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b548/5754414/84880d10262b/167_2017_4579_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b548/5754414/20457b402a20/167_2017_4579_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b548/5754414/3b87db9d11ac/167_2017_4579_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b548/5754414/8aa0eda9fd8f/167_2017_4579_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
New quantitative radiographic parameters for vertical and horizontal instability in acromioclavicular joint dislocations.肩锁关节脱位的垂直和水平不稳定的新定量放射学参数。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Jan;26(1):125-135. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4579-6. Epub 2017 May 25.
2
Improved identification of unstable acromioclavicular joint injuries in a clinical population using the acromial center line to dorsal clavicle radiographic measurement.采用肩峰中心连线至锁骨背侧的放射测量方法,可提高临床人群中不稳定肩锁关节损伤的识别率。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Aug;29(8):1599-1605. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.014. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
3
Evaluation of the Circles Measurement and the ABC Classification of Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries.评估肩锁关节损伤的 Circles 测量法和 ABC 分类法。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 May;49(6):1619-1625. doi: 10.1177/03635465211003300. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
4
Is coracoclavicular stabilisation alone sufficient for the endoscopic treatment of severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation (Rockwood types III, IV, and V)?仅喙锁固定对于严重肩锁关节脱位(Rockwood III型、IV型和V型)的内镜治疗是否足够?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Dec;101(8 Suppl):S297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.003. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
5
Reliability of radiographic measurements for acromioclavicular joint separations.肩锁关节分离的影像学测量的可靠性
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Dec;101(8 Suppl):S291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.010.
6
Surgery improves the clinical and radiological outcome in Rockwood type IV dislocations, whereas Rockwood type III dislocations benefit from conservative treatment.手术可改善Rockwood IV型脱位的临床和影像学结果,而Rockwood III型脱位则受益于保守治疗。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Jul;29(7):2143-2151. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06193-0. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
7
Dynamic radiologic evaluation of horizontal instability in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.动态放射学评估急性肩锁关节脱位中的水平不稳定。
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1188-95. doi: 10.1177/0363546510361951. Epub 2010 Apr 1.
8
The ligamentous injury pattern in acute acromioclavicular dislocations and its impact on clinical and radiographic parameters.急性肩锁关节脱位的韧带损伤模式及其对临床和影像学参数的影响。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Apr;30(4):795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.026. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
9
Injury patterns of the acromioclavicular ligament complex in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: a cross-sectional, fundamental study.急性肩锁关节脱位时肩锁韧带复合体的损伤模式:一项横断面基础研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Sep 6;17(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1240-3.
10
[Instability pattern of acromioclavicular joint dislocations type Rockwood III: relevance of horizontal instability].[Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位的不稳定模式:水平不稳定的相关性]
Orthopade. 2013 Apr;42(4):271-7. doi: 10.1007/s00132-013-2085-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Inter- and Intrarater Reliability of the Acromioclavicular Joint Injury Classification on Anteroposterior Radiographs.前后位X线片上肩锁关节损伤分类的组内及组间可靠性
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 May 15;13(5):23259671251337470. doi: 10.1177/23259671251337470. eCollection 2025 May.
2
No Short-Term Effects of Acromioclavicular Joint Augmentation in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Stabilization Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial on 70 Patients.肩锁关节增强术在急性肩锁关节稳定手术中无短期效果:一项针对70例患者的随机对照临床试验
J Clin Med. 2025 May 2;14(9):3161. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093161.
3
Combined Repair and Reconstruction of Coracoclavicular and Acromioclavicular Ligaments for Acute and Chronic AC Joint Dislocations: A Technical Note and Prospective Case Series.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantification of dynamic posterior translation in modified bilateral Alexander views and correlation with clinical and radiological parameters in patients with acute acromioclavicular joint instability.改良双侧亚历山大位片中动态后移的量化及其与急性肩锁关节不稳患者临床和影像学参数的相关性
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Jun;137(6):845-852. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2691-1. Epub 2017 Apr 17.
2
Surgical versus conservative management of Type III acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review.Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗与保守治疗:一项系统评价
Br Med Bull. 2017 Jun 1;122(1):31-49. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldx003.
3
Prevalence of remaining horizontal instability in high-grade acromioclavicular joint injuries surgically managed.
喙锁韧带和肩锁韧带联合修复与重建治疗急性和慢性肩锁关节脱位:技术说明与前瞻性病例系列
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 4;14(5):1730. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051730.
4
Medial placement of trapezoid tunnel leads to higher reduction loss in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with anatomic coracoclavicular fixation.在采用解剖学喙锁固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位时,梯形隧道的内侧放置会导致更高的复位丢失率。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Jul;16(3):265-273. doi: 10.1177/17585732231170322. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
5
Anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with triple flip-buttons leads to good functional outcomes and low reduction loss: a case series.采用三重翻转纽扣进行解剖学喙锁韧带重建可带来良好的功能结果和较低的复位丢失率:病例系列研究
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2023 Jun;26(2):140-147. doi: 10.5397/cise.2022.01298. Epub 2023 May 3.
6
The Reliability of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation Classification Systems: A Comparison Between the Rockwood and Kraus Classifications.肩锁关节脱位分类系统的可靠性:Rockwood分类与Kraus分类的比较
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Feb 17;11(2):23259671221149391. doi: 10.1177/23259671221149391. eCollection 2023 Feb.
7
Reliability of the ISAKOS Modification to Subclassify Rockwood Type III Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries.ISAKOS对RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节损伤进行亚分类的可靠性。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Dec 19;10(12):23259671221133379. doi: 10.1177/23259671221133379. eCollection 2022 Dec.
8
Current concepts in acromioclavicular joint (AC) instability - a proposed treatment algorithm for acute and chronic AC-joint surgery.当前肩锁关节(AC)不稳定的概念——急性和慢性 AC 关节手术的治疗方案建议。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 9;23(1):1078. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05935-0.
9
Arthroscopic-Assisted Coracoclavicular Stabilization With Anchorless Transosseous Double-Row Acromioclavicular Ligament Complex Repair: The Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation.关节镜辅助下无锚钉经骨双排肩锁韧带复合体修复的喙锁稳定术:急性肩锁关节脱位
Arthrosc Tech. 2022 Sep 21;11(9):e1649-e1659. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.05.012. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Bone tunnel placement influences shear stresses at the coracoid process after coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: a finite element study and radiological analysis.喙突骨隧道位置对喙锁韧带重建后喙突处剪切应力的影响:一项有限元研究和影像学分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Feb;143(2):959-965. doi: 10.1007/s00402-022-04382-9. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
手术治疗的重度肩锁关节损伤中残余水平不稳定的患病率。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017 Apr;27(3):323-333. doi: 10.1007/s00590-016-1898-0. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
4
Reliability of radiographic measurements for acromioclavicular joint separations.肩锁关节分离的影像学测量的可靠性
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Dec;101(8 Suppl):S291-5. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.010.
5
Prognostic factors to succeed in surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocations.慢性肩锁关节脱位手术治疗成功的预后因素。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015 Dec;101(8 Suppl):S305-11. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
Acromioclavicular joint instability: anatomy, biomechanics and evaluation.肩锁关节不稳定:解剖学、生物力学与评估
Joints. 2014 Jul 8;2(2):87-92. doi: 10.11138/jts/2014.2.2.087. eCollection 2014 Apr-Jun.
7
Inter- and intraobserver reliability of the Rockwood classification in acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations.Rockwood分类法在急性肩锁关节脱位中的观察者间及观察者内可靠性
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jul;24(7):2192-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3436-0. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
8
Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: hook plate versus minimally invasive reconstruction.急性肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗:钩钢板与微创重建对比
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jun;24(6):1972-8. doi: 10.1007/s00167-014-3294-9. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
9
Reliability of the classification and treatment of dislocations of the acromioclavicular joint.肩锁关节脱位的分类和治疗的可靠性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 May;23(5):665-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.02.005.
10
ISAKOS upper extremity committee consensus statement on the need for diversification of the Rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries.ISAKOS 上肢委员会关于需要对肩锁关节损伤的 Rockwood 分类进行多样化的共识声明。
Arthroscopy. 2014 Feb;30(2):271-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.11.005.