The authors' affiliations are listed in the Appendix.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):320-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082. Epub 2014 Nov 16.
Nivolumab was associated with higher rates of objective response than chemotherapy in a phase 3 study involving patients with ipilimumab-refractory metastatic melanoma. The use of nivolumab in previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma has not been tested in a phase 3 controlled study.
We randomly assigned 418 previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks and dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks and nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival.
At 1 year, the overall rate of survival was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.5 to 78.9) in the nivolumab group, as compared with 42.1% (95% CI, 33.0 to 50.9) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.42; 99.79% CI, 0.25 to 0.73; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in the nivolumab group versus 2.2 months in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death or progression of disease, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.56; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 40.0% (95% CI, 33.3 to 47.0) in the nivolumab group versus 13.9% (95% CI, 9.5 to 19.4) in the dacarbazine group (odds ratio, 4.06; P<0.001). The survival benefit with nivolumab versus dacarbazine was observed across prespecified subgroups, including subgroups defined by status regarding the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Common adverse events associated with nivolumab included fatigue, pruritus, and nausea. Drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 11.7% of the patients treated with nivolumab and 17.6% of those treated with dacarbazine.
Nivolumab was associated with significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival, as compared with dacarbazine, among previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 066 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01721772.).
纳武单抗(nivolumab)在一项涉及 ipilimumab 难治性转移性黑色素瘤患者的 3 期研究中,与化疗相比,具有更高的客观缓解率。纳武单抗在未经治疗的晚期黑色素瘤患者中的应用尚未在 3 期对照研究中进行测试。
我们随机分配了 418 名未经治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者,这些患者没有 BRAF 突变,接受纳武单抗(每 2 周 3 毫克/每公斤体重,每 3 周给予达卡巴嗪匹配安慰剂)或达卡巴嗪(每平方米体表面积 1000 毫克,每 3 周给予纳武单抗匹配安慰剂,每 2 周给予)。主要终点是总生存期。
1 年后,纳武单抗组的总生存率为 72.9%(95%置信区间[CI],65.5%至 78.9%),而达卡巴嗪组为 42.1%(95%CI,33.0%至 50.9%)(死亡风险比,0.42;99.79%CI,0.25 至 0.73;P<0.001)。纳武单抗组的无进展生存期中位数为 5.1 个月,而达卡巴嗪组为 2.2 个月(疾病进展或死亡的风险比,0.43;95%CI,0.34 至 0.56;P<0.001)。纳武单抗组的客观缓解率为 40.0%(95%CI,33.3%至 47.0%),而达卡巴嗪组为 13.9%(95%CI,9.5%至 19.4%)(比值比,4.06;P<0.001)。在包括程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)状态的预先指定亚组中观察到纳武单抗与达卡巴嗪相比的生存获益。与纳武单抗相关的常见不良反应包括疲劳、瘙痒和恶心。接受纳武单抗治疗的患者中有 11.7%和接受达卡巴嗪治疗的患者中有 17.6%发生 3 级或 4 级药物相关不良事件。
与达卡巴嗪相比,纳武单抗可显著改善未经治疗的转移性黑色素瘤患者的总生存期和无进展生存期,这些患者没有 BRAF 突变。(由 Bristol-Myers Squibb 资助;CheckMate 066 临床试验.gov 编号,NCT01721772。)